IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/vgmu00/2021i2p87-106.html

"Дачная Перспектива" Удаленной Занятости

Author

Listed:
  • Розинская Н. А.
  • Розинский И. А.

Abstract

Ускоренная карантином 2020 г. трансформация технологических процессов во многих отраслях экономики, в частности, рост удаленной занятости, в наиболее явном виде происходит в крупнейших городах. В статье приводятся аргументы в пользу гипотезы, что в силу отечественных социально-экономических реалий (сложившийся тип расселения, структура и размеры собственности на недвижимость, уровень доходов) развитие удаленной занятости в России с большой вероятностью приведет к тому, что соотношение времени, проводимого россиянином в "первом" (городская квартира) и "втором" (дача) доме, сместится в сторону "второго дома" - дачи. Анализируются факторы, способствующие такому смещению, с особым упором на реальные последствия проводимой государством политики. Источниками данных послужили публикации Росстата, содержащие данные по районам и сельским населенным пунктам Владимирской области, а также данные сайта департамента ЖКХ этого региона. Проведенный авторами на примере Владимирской области расчетный анализ показал, что государственные программы развития сельских территорий в Центральной России фактически ведут к росту интенсивности использования дач, при этом процесс депопуляции сельских территорий не останавливается, а давление на муниципальные бюджеты усиливается. На базе проведенного анализа формулируются предложения о том, как отмеченный тренд к росту интенсивности использования дач может быть полезен для содействия развитию сельских районов.

Suggested Citation

  • Розинская Н. А. & Розинский И. А., 2021. ""Дачная Перспектива" Удаленной Занятости," Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления // Public administration issues, НИУ ВШЭ, issue 2, pages 87-106.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:vgmu00:2021:i:2:p:87-106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2021/06/12/1441010296/4_Bloc_2_2021.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dingel, Jonathan I. & Neiman, Brent, 2020. "How many jobs can be done at home?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Alexander Bick & Adam Blandin & Karel Mertens, 2023. "Work from Home before and after the COVID-19 Outbreak," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 1-39, October.
    3. Daniel Garrote Sanchez & Nicolas Gomez Parra & Caglar Ozden & Bob Rijkers & Mariana Viollaz & Hernan Winkler, 0. "Who on Earth Can Work from Home?," World Bank Research Observer, World Bank Group, vol. 36(1), pages 67-100.
    4. Charles Gottlieb & Jan Grobovsek & Markus Poschke, 2020. "Working from Home across Countries," Cahiers de recherche 07-2020, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gottlieb, Charles & Grobovšek, Jan & Poschke, Markus & Saltiel, Fernando, 2021. "Working from home in developing countries," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    2. Christian Kagerl & Julia Starzetz, 2023. "Working from home for good? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and what this means for the future of work," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 229-265, January.
    3. Adams-Prassl, Abi & Boneva, Teodora & Golin, Marta & Rauh, Christopher, 2022. "Work that can be done from home: evidence on variation within and across occupations and industries," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Alexander Bick & Adam Blandin & Aidan Caplan & Tristan Caplan, 2025. "Measuring Trends in Work from Home: Evidence from Six U.S. Datasets," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 107(15), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Adams-Prassl, A. & Boneva, T. & Golin, M. & Rauh, C., 2020. "Work Tasks That Can Be Done From Home: Evidence on Variation Within and Across Occupations and Industries," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2040, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    6. Carlos Díaz & Sebastian Fossati & Nicolás Trajtenberg, 2022. "Stay at home if you can: COVID‐19 stay‐at‐home guidelines and local crime," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 1067-1113, December.
    7. Adina-Maria IORGANDA (VODA) & Monica ROMAN, 2020. "Work From Home By Occupation In Romania: Initial Assesment In The Context Of Covid-19 Pandemic," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 811-820, November.
    8. Breda, Thomas & Dutronc-Postel, Paul & Pecheu, Vladimir, 2026. "Does feasibility explain the unequal development of working from home?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    9. Bakalova, Irina & Berlinschi, Ruxanda & Fidrmuc, Jan & Dzyuba, Yuri, 2021. "COVID-19, Working from Home and the Potential Reverse Brain Drain," GLO Discussion Paper Series 845, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    10. Gottlieb Charles & Grobovšek Jan & Poschke Markus & Saltiel Fernando, 2022. "Lockdown Accounting," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 22(1), pages 197-210, January.
    11. Cecilia Peluffo & Mariana Viollaz, 2021. "Intra-household exposure to labor market risk in the time of Covid-19: lessons from Mexico," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 327-351, June.
    12. John McLaren & Su Wang, 2020. "Effects of Reduced Workplace Presence on COVID-19 Deaths: An Instrumental-Variables Approach," NBER Working Papers 28275, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Brum, Matias & De Rosa, Mauricio, 2021. "Too little but not too late: nowcasting poverty and cash transfers’ incidence during COVID-19’s crisis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    14. Bergeaud, Antonin & Eyméoud, Jean-Benoît & Garcia, Thomas & Henricot, Dorian, 2023. "Working from home and corporate real estate," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    15. repec:osf:thesis:wdxuk_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Matías Brum & Mauricio de Rosa, 2020. "Too little but not too late. Nowcasting poverty and cash transfers' incidence in Uruguay during COVID-19's crisis," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 20-09, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
    17. Luca, Davide & Özgüzel, Cem & Wei, Zhiwu, 2024. "The spatially uneven diffusion of remote jobs in Europe," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122651, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Christos A. Makridis, 2025. "The Allocation of Time and Remote Work," CESifo Working Paper Series 12363, CESifo.
    19. Julia Darby & Stuart McIntyre & Graeme Roy, 2022. "What can analysis of 47 million job advertisements tell us about how opportunities for homeworking are evolving in the United Kingdom?," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 281-302, July.
    20. Jia, Grace & Ng, Kaitlyn & Ugurel, Ekin & Lee, Brian & Pendyala, Ram & Chen, Cynthia, 2025. "COVID & telecommuting-induced changes in individual activity and travel patterns: Evidence from the Puget Sound Region," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    21. Jose Maria Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J. Davis & Brent H. Meyer, 2021. "COVID-19 Is a Persistent Reallocation Shock," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 111, pages 287-291, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H31 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Household
    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns
    • R23 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Household Analysis - - - Regional Migration; Regional Labor Markets; Population

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:vgmu00:2021:i:2:p:87-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ирина Александровна Зверева (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vgmu.hse.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.