IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v15y2011i1p21-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moderating Effect of Personality Variable on Stress-Effectiveness Relationship: An Empirical Study on B-School Students

Author

Listed:
  • Shalini Srivastava
  • Deepti Pathak

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to explore the moderating effect of locus of control on relationship between general role stress and personal effectiveness of management graduates. The present study was done on a sample of 186 management students belonging to different management institutes. Variables in the study were assessed using three validated instruments. Descriptive statistics, Pearson product moment correlation and regression analysis were used to analyze the data. It was found that general stress was negatively related to personal effectiveness and locus of control moderates the relationship between the two. Results confirmed the importance of personality dimension as factor affecting personal effectiveness. It shows that the intensity of stress is reduced if the student focuses on locus of control thus making him more effective. By understanding the relationship between these variables the management institute should conduct and deliver training programmes to actively manage the budding managers. This study is the first of its kind to study the moderating effect of locus of control on the relationship between general role stress and personal effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Shalini Srivastava & Deepti Pathak, 2011. "Moderating Effect of Personality Variable on Stress-Effectiveness Relationship: An Empirical Study on B-School Students," Vision, , vol. 15(1), pages 21-30, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:15:y:2011:i:1:p:21-30
    DOI: 10.1177/097226291101500103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/097226291101500103
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/097226291101500103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elovainio, M. & Kivimäki, M. & Vahtera, J., 2002. "Organizational justice: Evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(1), pages 105-108.
    2. Jackson, Susan E. & Schuler, Randall S., 1985. "A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 16-78, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shalini Srivastava, 2009. "Locus of Control as a Moderator for Relationship between Organisational Role Stress and Managerial Effectiveness," Vision, , vol. 13(4), pages 49-61, October.
    2. Viator, Ralph E., 2001. "The association of formal and informal public accounting mentoring with role stress and related job outcomes," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 73-93, January.
    3. Parker, Robert J. & Kyj, Larissa, 2006. "Vertical information sharing in the budgeting process," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 27-45, January.
    4. Levine, Cynthia S. & Miller, Gregory E. & Shalowitz, Madeleine U. & Story, Rachel E. & Manczak, Erika M. & Hayen, Robin & Hoffer, Lauren C. & Le, Van & Vause, Katherine J. & Chen, Edith, 2019. "Academic disparities and health: How gender-based disparities in schools relate to boys' and girls’ health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 126-134.
    5. Hall, Matthew, 2008. "The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(2-3), pages 141-163.
    6. Alder, G. Stoney & Ambrose, Maureen L., 2005. "An examination of the effect of computerized performance monitoring feedback on monitoring fairness, performance, and satisfaction," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 161-177, July.
    7. Pearsall, Matthew J. & Ellis, Aleksander P.J. & Stein, Jordan H., 2009. "Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 18-28, May.
    8. T. S. Ragu-Nathan & Monideepa Tarafdar & Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan & Qiang Tu, 2008. "The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 417-433, December.
    9. Trujillo Flores Mara Maricela & Rivas Tovar Luis Arturo & Lambarry Vilchis Fernando, 2014. "Mobbing: A theoretical model quantifying factors affecting the role of women executives in the institutions of public education in Mexico," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 59(1), pages 195-228, enero-mar.
    10. Roland Kidwell & Franz Kellermanns & Kimberly Eddleston, 2012. "Harmony, Justice, Confusion, and Conflict in Family Firms: Implications for Ethical Climate and the “Fredo Effect”," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(4), pages 503-517, April.
    11. Heponiemi, Tarja & Manderbacka, Kristiina & Vänskä, Jukka & Elovainio, Marko, 2013. "Can organizational justice help the retention of general practitioners?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 22-28.
    12. Guillaume Soenen & Tessa Melkonian & Maureen L. Ambrose, 2017. "To Shift or Not to Shift? : Determinants and Consequences of Phase-Shifting on Justice Judgments," Post-Print hal-02276701, HAL.
    13. Cravens, David W. & Lassk, Felicia G. & Low, George S. & Marshall, Greg W. & Moncrief, William C., 2004. "Formal and informal management control combinations in sales organizations: The impact on salesperson consequences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 241-248, March.
    14. Boles, James S. & Babin, Barry J., 1996. "On the front lines: Stress, conflict, and the customer service provider," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 41-50, September.
    15. Tariku Ayana Abdi & José M. Peiró & Yarid Ayala & Salvatore Zappalà, 2018. "Four Wellbeing Patterns and their Antecedents in Millennials at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Dean Tjosvold & Nancy Yifeng Chen & Xu Huang & Da Xu, 2014. "Developing Cooperative Teams to Support Individual Performance and Well-Being in a Call Center in China," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 325-348, March.
    17. Shuanglong Wang & Nathan Eva & Alexander Newman & Haihua Zhou, 2021. "A double-edged sword: the effects of ambidextrous leadership on follower innovative behaviors," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(4), pages 1305-1326, December.
    18. Cokkie Verschuren & Maria Tims & Annet H. De Lange, 2023. "Beyond Bullying, Aggression, Discrimination, and Social Safety: Development of an Integrated Negative Work Behavior Questionnaire (INWBQ)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(16), pages 1-24, August.
    19. Muhammad Rizwan & Muhammad Ali Raza & Muhammad Abdul Mateen & Faisal Tehseen & Muhammad Shahaid Farooq & Amjad Javed & Sharjeel Javed, 2014. "Investigating the Causes of Job Stress: A Study on Banking Sector of Bahawalpur, Pakistan," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(2), pages 227-241, June.
    20. Yumiko Kobayashi & Naoki Kondo, 2019. "Organizational justice, psychological distress, and stress-related behaviors by occupational class in female Japanese employees," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:15:y:2011:i:1:p:21-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.