IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pubfin/v54y2026i1p110-151.html

Distrust Deficits, Government Effectiveness and Coronavirus Financing

Author

Listed:
  • Mike Seiferling

Abstract

This paper explores the role of political institutions, government effectiveness and, social trust in determining government financial responses to the coronavirus pandemic. The results from a globally representative sample of eighty countries over the Q3 2020 - Q3 2021 period suggest that politics did play a role in determining financial response to the coronavirus pandemic but the effects were more driven by current factors (electoral competition and executive fragmentation) and the effectiveness of, and trust in, government, than by institutional factors such as regime type or dynamic factors such as the political business cycle. Ineffective governments outspent effective ones with the magnitude of financial responses diverging as trust in government increases. These findings suggest that highly trusted effective governments were able to capitalize on trust premiums to minimize covid spending while highly trusted ineffective governments took advantage of trust premiums to maximize the size of their spending packages.

Suggested Citation

  • Mike Seiferling, 2026. "Distrust Deficits, Government Effectiveness and Coronavirus Financing," Public Finance Review, , vol. 54(1), pages 110-151, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:54:y:2026:i:1:p:110-151
    DOI: 10.1177/10911421251356655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10911421251356655
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10911421251356655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pubfin:v:54:y:2026:i:1:p:110-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.