IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v51y2024i6p1227-1247.html

Discontinuities in regional economic development due to administrative boundaries: Examining the mechanisms of the boundary effect

Author

Listed:
  • Jindo Jeong

Abstract

Although administrative boundaries are non-physical, they can cause regional inequalities through boundary effects that result in discontinuities between areas. The boundary effect refers to the disparities in policy, economic, and social aspects between areas caused by administrative boundaries, which can lead to regional differences. This study aims to identify the mechanisms that induce discontinuities in regional development due to administrative boundaries. The boundary effect mechanism assumed to include the spillover, fragmentation, and hierarchy effects were examined using six scenarios, each modeled using a spatial economic model. Through the comparison of various scenarios, we have demonstrated the potential validity of the three components comprising the assumed boundary effect. Furthermore, we have confirmed that the model incorporating all effects that we assumed in our research, namely spillover, fragmentation, and hierarchy effects, provides the best fit. We hypothesized and verified the mechanism of boundary effects that disrupt regional development, thereby enhancing the understanding of these effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Jindo Jeong, 2024. "Discontinuities in regional economic development due to administrative boundaries: Examining the mechanisms of the boundary effect," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(6), pages 1227-1247, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:6:p:1227-1247
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083231217013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083231217013
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083231217013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles M. Tiebout, 1956. "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64(5), pages 416-416.
    2. Shaffer, Sherrill, 2002. "Firm size and economic growth," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 195-203, July.
    3. Katharina Pijnenburg & Konstantin A. Kholodilin, 2014. "Do Regions with Entrepreneurial Neighbours Perform Better? A Spatial Econometric Approach for German Regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(5), pages 866-882, May.
    4. Daniel P. McMillen, 2010. "Issues In Spatial Data Analysis," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 119-141, February.
    5. Sandra E. Black, 1999. "Do Better Schools Matter? Parental Valuation of Elementary Education," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 114(2), pages 577-599.
    6. Yu, Jihai & de Jong, Robert & Lee, Lung-fei, 2008. "Quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for spatial dynamic panel data with fixed effects when both n and T are large," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 118-134, September.
    7. Cem Ertur & Wilfried Koch, 2007. "Growth, technological interdependence and spatial externalities: theory and evidence," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(6), pages 1033-1062.
    8. Jia, Junxue & Liang, Xuan & Ma, Guangrong, 2021. "Political hierarchy and regional economic development: Evidence from a spatial discontinuity in China," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    9. Gibbons, Stephen & Machin, Stephen & Silva, Olmo, 2013. "Valuing school quality using boundary discontinuity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 45246, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Maté-Sánchez-Val, Mariluz & López-Hernandez, Fernando & Mur-Lacambra, Jesús, 2017. "How do neighboring peer companies influence SMEs’ financial behavior?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 104-114.
    11. Yuzo Honda, 1985. "Testing the Error Components Model with Non-Normal Disturbances," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 52(4), pages 681-690.
    12. Poncet, Sandra, 2006. "Provincial migration dynamics in China: Borders, costs and economic motivations," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 385-398, May.
    13. Edward L. Glaeser & Glenn Ellison, 1999. "The Geographic Concentration of Industry: Does Natural Advantage Explain Agglomeration?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(2), pages 311-316, May.
    14. Wei-Ju Huang, 2022. "Repositioning the rural in city-regionalism through a locally based functional analysis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(5), pages 770-781, May.
    15. Gibbons, Stephen & Machin, Stephen & Silva, Olmo, 2013. "Valuing school quality using boundary discontinuities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 15-28.
    16. Dan He & Zhiqiong Zhang & Minglong Han & Yizhi Kang & Peng Gao, 2022. "Multi-dimensional boundary effects and regional economic integration: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 45(4), pages 472-498, July.
    17. Ana Petrović & Maarten van Ham & David Manley, 2022. "Where Do Neighborhood Effects End? Moving to Multiscale Spatial Contextual Effects," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(2), pages 581-601, February.
    18. Rob Kitchin & Niamh Moore-Cherry, 2021. "Fragmented governance, the urban data ecosystem and smart city-regions: the case of Metropolitan Boston," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(12), pages 1913-1923, December.
    19. Christoph Basten & Maximilian Ehrlich & Andrea Lassmann, 2017. "Income Taxes, Sorting and the Costs of Housing: Evidence from Municipal Boundaries in Switzerland," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0(601), pages 653-687, May.
    20. Raspe, Otto & van Oort, Frank G., 2011. "Firm heterogeneity, productivity and spatially bounded knowledge externalities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 38-47, March.
    21. Agustin Leon-Moreta & Vittoria Totaro, 2023. "Interlocal interactions, municipal boundaries and water and wastewater expenditure in city-regions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(1), pages 46-66, January.
    22. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2018. "Breaking Down the Border: Physical, Institutional and Cultural Obstacles," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 94(5), pages 485-513, October.
    23. Vicente Rios & Pedro Pascual & Fermín Cabases, 2017. "What drives local government spending in Spain? A dynamic spatial panel approach," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2-3), pages 230-250, July.
    24. Mur, Jesús & Angulo, Ana, 2009. "Model selection strategies in a spatial setting: Some additional results," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 200-213, March.
    25. Luc Anselin, 2010. "Thirty years of spatial econometrics," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 89(1), pages 3-25, March.
    26. Shenoy, Ajay, 2018. "Regional development through place-based policies: Evidence from a spatial discontinuity," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 173-189.
    27. Robert Bennett, 1997. "Administrative Systems and Economic Spaces," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 323-336.
    28. Natalia Bailey & Sean Holly & M. Hashem Pesaran, 2016. "A Two‐Stage Approach to Spatio‐Temporal Analysis with Strong and Weak Cross‐Sectional Dependence," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 249-280, January.
    29. Ron Martin & Peter Sunley, 2006. "Path dependence and regional economic evolution," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 395-437, August.
    30. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2018. "Measuring border effects in European cross-border regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(7), pages 986-996, July.
    31. Jorge Díaz-Lanchas & José Luis Zofío & Carlos Llano, 2022. "A trade hierarchy of cities based on transport cost thresholds," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(8), pages 1359-1376, August.
    32. Evelyn Blumenberg & Hannah King, 2021. "Jobs–Housing Balance Re-Re-Visited," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 87(4), pages 484-496, October.
    33. Partridge, Mark D. & Rickman, Dan S. & Ali, Kamar & Olfert, M. Rose, 2009. "Agglomeration spillovers and wage and housing cost gradients across the urban hierarchy," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 126-140, June.
    34. Wang, Chenglong & Liu, Hui & Zhang, Mengtian & Wei, Zongcai, 2018. "The border effect on urban land expansion in China: The case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 287-294.
    35. Giorgio Topa, 2001. "Social Interactions, Local Spillovers and Unemployment," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 68(2), pages 261-295.
    36. Olivier Parent & James Lesage, 2005. "Bayesian Model Averaging for Spatial Econometric Models," Post-Print hal-00375489, HAL.
    37. Xuebo Zhang & Cansong Li & Wei Li & Jinping Song & Chengfeng Yang, 2017. "Do Administrative Boundaries Matter for Uneven Economic Development? A Case Study of China's Provincial Border Counties," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 883-908, December.
    38. Capozza, Dennis R. & Helsley, Robert W., 1989. "The fundamentals of land prices and urban growth," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 295-306, November.
    39. Glumac, Brano & Herrera-Gomez, Marcos & Licheron, Julien, 2019. "A hedonic urban land price index," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 802-812.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marius Brülhart & Jayson Danton & Raphaël Parchet & Jörg Schläpfer, 2025. "Who Bears the Burden of Local Taxes?," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 464-505, February.
    2. Pedro de Araujo & Kate Cheng, 2017. "Do Preferences For Amenities Differ Among Home Buyers? A Hedonic Price Approach," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 165-184, November.
    3. Christian A. L. Hilber, 2017. "The Economic Implications of House Price Capitalization: A Synthesis," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 45(2), pages 301-339, April.
    4. Peng, Ying & Tian, Chuanhao & Wen, Haizhen, 2021. "How does school district adjustment affect housing prices: An empirical investigation from Hangzhou, China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    5. Pei Li & Yi Lu & Tuan-Heww Sng, 2017. "Artificial Administrative Boundaries: Evidence from China," CEH Discussion Papers 09, Centre for Economic History, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
    6. Melser, Daniel & Moallemi, Morteza & Kim, Jun Sung, 2021. "Preferences for single-sex schools: Evidence from the housing market," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 710-726.
    7. Nguyen-Hoang, Phuong & Yinger, John, 2011. "The capitalization of school quality into house values: A review," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 30-48, March.
    8. Xiao, Yue & Wen, Haizhen & Hui, Eddie C.M. & Zhou, Ganghua, 2022. "Dynamic capitalization effects of educational facilities during different market stages: An empirical study in Hangzhou, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    9. Mothorpe, Christopher, 2018. "The impact of uncertainty on school quality capitalization using the border method," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 127-141.
    10. Jin Lee, 2021. "New Localism in the Neoliberal Era: Local District Response to Voluntary Open-School Markets in Ohio," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    11. Jin, Zhiyun & Wang, Xingrui & Huang, Bin, 2023. "The enrolment reform of schools and housing price: Empirical evidence from Shanghai, China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 262-273.
    12. Huang, Bin & He, Xiaoyan & Xu, Lei & Zhu, Yu, 2018. "Elite School Designation and House Prices - Quasi-experimental Evidence from Beijing, China," GLO Discussion Paper Series 283, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    13. Di Cataldo, Marco & Romani, Giulia, 2024. "Rational cuts? The local impact of closing undersized schools," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    14. Sadegh Eshaghnia & James J. Heckman & Goya Razavi, 2023. "Pricing Neighborhoods," NBER Working Papers 31371, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Huang, Bin & He, Xiaoyan & Xu, Lei & Zhu, Yu, 2020. "Elite school designation and housing prices-quasi-experimental evidence from Beijing, China✰," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    16. Hu, Lirong & He, Shenjing & Luo, Yun & Su, Shiliang & Xin, Jing & Weng, Min, 2020. "A social-media-based approach to assessing the effectiveness of equitable housing policy in mitigating education accessibility induced social inequalities in Shanghai, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    17. Di Cataldo, Marco & Romani, Giulia, 2023. "The local impact of closing undersized schools," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119359, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Huang, Bin & He, Xiaoyan & Xu, Lei & Zhu, Yu, 2020. "Elite School Designation and Housing Prices: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Beijing, China," IZA Discussion Papers 12897, IZA Network @ LISER.
    19. Zheng, Hefan & Wang, Qiuyi & Li, Keyang & Wu, Jing, 2025. "Information disclosure, search cost, and the housing market," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    20. Christoph Basten & Maximilian Ehrlich & Andrea Lassmann, 2017. "Income Taxes, Sorting and the Costs of Housing: Evidence from Municipal Boundaries in Switzerland," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0(601), pages 653-687, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:51:y:2024:i:6:p:1227-1247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.