IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ausman/v50y2025i1p8-31.html

Objective and subjective measurement in applied business settings: Improving research in organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Peter J Jordan
  • Ashlea C Troth
  • Hongmin Yan

    (Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia)

Abstract

The inclusion of rigorous measures and methods by researchers often influence a reviewer’s and editor’s decision about whether an article is accepted. In positivist research, studies that include objective measures (i.e. avoiding respondent bias) are often considered superior. We argue that the methodological quality of a study is not merely achieved by including an objective measure, but instead by understanding the strengths and limitations of the measure (whether objective or subjective) and its appropriateness for addressing the research question. We consider the suitability of using objective and subjective measures in research at both macro and micro levels and emphasize the strengths and weaknesses of both, using criteria of bias, validity, reliability, sensitivity, and feasibility. As an underexamined topic in applied business research, we overview some types of objective measurement that have been adopted in the applied management discipline and consider their utility. JEL Classification: C90, D23

Suggested Citation

  • Peter J Jordan & Ashlea C Troth & Hongmin Yan, 2025. "Objective and subjective measurement in applied business settings: Improving research in organizations," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 50(1), pages 8-31, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:50:y:2025:i:1:p:8-31
    DOI: 10.1177/03128962241286258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03128962241286258
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/03128962241286258?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamilton, R.H. & Sodeman, William A., 2020. "The questions we ask: Opportunities and challenges for using big data analytics to strategically manage human capital resources," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 85-95.
    2. David R. Gallagher & Prashanthi Nadarajah, 2004. "Top Management Turnover: An Analysis of Active Australian Investment Managers," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 29(2), pages 243-274, December.
    3. Mathieu J. P. Poirier & Karen A. Grépin & Michel Grignon, 2020. "Approaches and Alternatives to the Wealth Index to Measure Socioeconomic Status Using Survey Data: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 1-46, February.
    4. Dirk De Clercq & Renato Pereira, 2021. "“Hey everyone, look at me helping you!†: A contingency view of the relationship between exhibitionism and peer-oriented helping behaviors," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 46(4), pages 717-739, November.
    5. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    6. Ricardo Delao & Sean Myers, 2021. "Subjective Cash Flow and Discount Rate Expectations," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 76(3), pages 1339-1387, June.
    7. Chris F Wright & Andreea Constantin, 2021. "Why recruit temporary sponsored skilled migrants? A human capital theory analysis of employer motivations in Australia," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 46(1), pages 151-173, February.
    8. Matthew Grosse & Nelson Ma & Tom Scott, 2020. "Evidence on compensation consultant fees and CEO pay," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(1), pages 15-44, February.
    9. Peter J Jordan & Ashlea C Troth, 2020. "Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(1), pages 3-14, February.
    10. John B. Davis, 2023. "Objectivity in economics and the problem of the individual," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 276-289, October.
    11. Martina K Linnenluecke & Mauricio Marrone & Abhay K Singh, 2020. "Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(2), pages 175-194, May.
    12. Julian Reiss, 2017. "Fact-value entanglement in positive economics," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 134-149, April.
    13. Mokhinabonu Mardonova & Yosoon Choi, 2018. "Review of Wearable Device Technology and Its Applications to the Mining Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Raj Chetty, 2015. "Behavioral Economics and Public Policy: A Pragmatic Perspective," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 1-33, May.
    15. Ashlea C Troth & Keith Townsend & Rebecca Loudoun & Matt Burgess, 2023. "Frontline managers’ task-related emotion regulation, emotional intelligence, and daily stress," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 48(1), pages 108-129, February.
    16. Drerup, Tilman & Enke, Benjamin & von Gaudecker, Hans-Martin, 2017. "The precision of subjective data and the explanatory power of economic models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 200(2), pages 378-389.
    17. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    18. Steve Easton & Sean Pinder, 2022. "Measuring the price of Australian water," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 47(1), pages 24-33, February.
    19. Jordan, Peter J & Lawrence, Sandra A, 2009. "Emotional intelligence in teams: Development and initial validation of the short version of the Workgroup Emotional Intelligence Profile (WEIP-S)," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 452-469, September.
    20. Jordan, Peter J & Lawrence, Sandra A & Troth, Ashlea C, 2006. "The impact of negative mood on team performance," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 131-145, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin, Tingting & Chorda, Isidre March, 2025. "The impact of green strategy hybrid orientation on startup performance in SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreea-Ionela Puiu & Anca Monica Ardeleanu & Camelia Cojocaru & Anca Bratu, 2021. "Exploring the Effect of Status Quo, Innovativeness, and Involvement Tendencies on Luxury Fashion Innovations: The Mediation Role of Status Consumption," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Brülisauer, Marcel & Goette, Lorenz & Jiang, Zhengyi & Schmitz, Jan & Schubert, Renate, 2020. "Appliance-specific feedback and social comparisons: Evidence from a field experiment on energy conservation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    3. Hauck, Jana & Suess-Reyes, Julia & Beck, Susanne & Prügl, Reinhard & Frank, Hermann, 2016. "Measuring socioemotional wealth in family-owned and -managed firms: A validation and short form of the FIBER Scale," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 133-148.
    4. Liu, Hongfei & Liu, Wentong & Yoganathan, Vignesh & Osburg, Victoria-Sophie, 2021. "COVID-19 information overload and generation Z's social media discontinuance intention during the pandemic lockdown," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    5. Dorian Jullien, 2018. "Under Risk, Over Time, Regarding Other People: Language and Rationality within Three Dimensions," Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, in: Including a Symposium on Latin American Monetary Thought: Two Centuries in Search of Originality, volume 36, pages 119-155, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    6. Omid Momen & Akbar Esfahanipour & Abbas Seifi, 2020. "A robust behavioral portfolio selection: model with investor attitudes and biases," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 427-446, March.
    7. Alexandre Truc & Dorian Jullien, 2023. "A controversy about modeling practices: the case of inequity aversion," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 203-227, July.
    8. Xaimarie Hernández-Cruz & Saylisse Dávila, 2020. "Quantifying adaptive capacity to floods: an assessment of Rincón, PR," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 1537-1564, August.
    9. Bogliacino, Francesco & Codagnone, Cristiano, 2021. "Microfoundations, behaviour, and evolution: Evidence from experiments," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 372-385.
    10. Kevin Baird & Sophia Su & Rahat Munir, 2023. "The mediating role of levers of controls on the association between sustainable leadership and organisational resilience," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 167-200, June.
    11. Sommer, Stephan & Mattauch, Linus & Pahle, Michael, 2022. "Supporting carbon taxes: The role of fairness," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Kevin Baird & Vicki Baard, 2021. "Management controls and team effectiveness: the mediating role of team structural empowerment," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 517-558, December.
    13. Gary Charness & Thomas Garcia & Theo Offerman & Marie Claire Villeval, 2020. "Do measures of risk attitude in the laboratory predict behavior under risk in and outside of the laboratory?," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 99-123, April.
    14. Andor, Mark A. & Fels, Katja M., 2018. "Behavioral Economics and Energy Conservation – A Systematic Review of Non-price Interventions and Their Causal Effects," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 178-210.
    15. Constantin Charles & Cary D. Frydman & Mete Kilic, 2022. "Insensitive Investors," CESifo Working Paper Series 10067, CESifo.
    16. Nils Grevenbrock & Max Groneck & Alexander Ludwig & Alexander Zimper, 2021. "Cognition, Optimism, And The Formation Of Age‐Dependent Survival Beliefs," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 62(2), pages 887-918, May.
    17. Qiao Liu & Qiaowei Shen & Zhenghua Li & Shu Chen, 2021. "Stimulating Consumption at Low Budget: Evidence from a Large-Scale Policy Experiment Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(12), pages 7291-7307, December.
    18. Su, Sophia & Baird, Kevin & Phan, Thanh, 2024. "The association between ethical leadership and environmental activity management: The mediating role of employee environmental empowerment," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    19. Richard H. Thaler, 2016. "Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, and Future," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(7), pages 1577-1600, July.
    20. Gaurav Khemka & Yifu Tang & Geoffrey J. Warren, 2021. "The ‘right’ level for the superannuation guarantee: identifying the key considerations," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 4435-4474, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C90 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - General
    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ausman:v:50:y:2025:i:1:p:8-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.agsm.edu.au .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.