IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/rvofce/ofce_0751-6614_1993_num_43_1_1304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Le Grand marché et le commerce extérieur

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-François Loué
  • Patrick Messerlin

Abstract

[fre] De la signature du traité de Rome au Grand marché, la politique commerciale de la Communauté s'est donné pour ambition de transformer un espace commercial cloisonné en un marché unique où s 'appliquerait sans restriction la libre circulation des biens et des services, ce qui a entraîné la constitution d'une politique commerciale commune. Toutefois, la construction européenne n'a pas été dans tous les domaines un grand mouvement de libéralisation des échanges : en poursuivant de façon concurrente d'autres objectifs, en particulier des objectifs sociaux et industriels, la Communauté a aussi été conduite à protéger ses marchés. . Afin que l'on prenne la mesure du chemin parcouru, cet article commence par une description de la situation commerciale au début des années soixante, et illustre notamment le cloisonnement des échanges lié à la sauvegarde des liens coloniaux, puis rappelle les principales étapes de la construction du Grand marché,la politique commerciale de la Communauté vis-à-vis des pays tiers, et ses positions dans les grandes négociations internationales. . Incontestablement, la construction européenne a favorisé le développement des échanges intra-communautaires. Toutefois, ceci s'est fait, dans une certaine mesure, au détriment des pays tiers: entre 1965 et 1990, l'ouverture aux importations des douze pays de la Communauté considérés comme un seul pays a été très modérée, sans commune mesure, par exemple, avec l'ouverture de l'économie américaine. . Exposer la politique suivie dans quelques secteurs permet alors de démonter les principaux mécanismes de protection; ceux-ci ont dans l'ensemble une efficacité limitée sur l'emploi et leurs effets pervers sont parfois redoutables. Si la Communauté s'emploie à les démanteler sur son marché intérieur, elle en use à son tour vis-à-vis de producteurs extérieurs, comme le font d'ailleurs la plupart des pays. [eng] The Single Market and the External Trade. From the Treaty of Rome to the Single Market, the Community's trade policy has been one of transforming a closed commercial space into a single market where goods and services are freely mobile. However, the construction of Europe has not represented in every area a large movement toward free trade: as it sought other objectives, especially social and industrial ones, the Community has also been led to protect its markets. In order to measure the distance covered, this article starts with a description of the situation at the beginning of the sixties, illustrating in particular the partition of the markets linked to the protection of colonial relations, and then recalls the main stages of the construction of the Big- Market, the trade policy of the Community toward outside countries, and its position in the main international negotiations. . Undoubtedly, the construction of Europe has contributed to the development of the intra-community trade. However, this occured partly to the detriment of other countries: between 1965 and 1990, the increase in imports of the twelve European countries, considered as a single country, has been very moderate relatively to their income, not in keeping to the opening of the American economy. . Describing the policy in a few sectors seems to be a good way to explain the main protection mechanisms: these are generally poorly efficient, often with perverse effects. If the Community works to suppress barriers inside its own market, it also uses them in turn, against outside producers, as most countries often do.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-François Loué & Patrick Messerlin, 1993. "Le Grand marché et le commerce extérieur," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 43(1), pages 243-272.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_1993_num_43_1_1304
    DOI: 10.3406/ofce.1993.1304
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ofce.1993.1304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ofce.1993.1304
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ofce_0751-6614_1993_num_43_1_1304
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ofce.1993.1304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Melo, Jaime & Messerlin, Patrick, 1988. "Effects of European VERs on Japanese autos," Policy Research Working Paper Series 21, The World Bank.
    2. Alexis Jacquemin & André Sapir, 1988. "European integration or world integration?," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 124(1), pages 127-139, March.
    3. Jaime de Melo & Patrick Messerlin, 1988. "Price, Quality and Welfare Effects of European VERs on Japanese Autos," Post-Print hal-03393287, HAL.
    4. M. F. W. Hemming & C. M. Miles & G. F. Ray, 1959. "A Statistical Summary of the Extent of Import Control in the United Kingdom since the War," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 26(2), pages 75-109.
    5. Melo, Jaime de & Messerlin, Patrick A., 1988. "Price, quality and welfare effects of European VERs on Japanese autos," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1527-1546, September.
    6. Patrick Messerlin, 1992. "Trade Policies in France," Post-Print hal-03397699, HAL.
    7. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/7686 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7686 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/6629 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Chad P. Bown & Rachel McCulloch, 2012. "Antidumping and Market Competition: Implications for Emerging Economies," Working Papers 50, Brandeis University, Department of Economics and International Business School.
    3. Yves Bourdet, 1991. "Pricing policy and quality upgrading in the Swedish car market: Do import surveillance and exchange rate instability matter?," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 255-274, October.
    4. Douglas Nelson, 1996. "The Political Economy of U.S. Automobile Protection," NBER Chapters, in: The Political Economy of American Trade Policy, pages 133-196, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Irandoust, Manuchehr, 1998. "Pricing Policy in the Swedish Automobile Market," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 309-317, May.
    6. Reis, Hugo J. & Santos Silva, J.M.C., 2006. "Hedonic prices indexes for new passenger cars in Portugal (1997-2001)," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 890-908, December.
    7. Manuchehr Irandoust, 1996. "An empirical analysis of market performance in the car industry," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 327-348, October.
    8. Dirk De Bièvre & Emile van Ommeren, 2021. "Multilateralism, Bilateralism and Institutional Choice: The Political Economy of Regime Complexes in International Trade Policy," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S4), pages 14-24, May.
    9. Arawomo, Damilola F. & Osigwe, Augustine C., 2016. "Nexus of fuel consumption, car features and car prices: Evidence from major institutions in Ibadan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1220-1228.
    10. Irandoust, Manuchehr, 1999. "Market structure and market shares in the car industry," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 531-544, December.
    11. Arribas, Iván & Bensassi, Sami & Tortosa-Ausina, Emili, 2020. "Trade integration in the European Union: Openness, interconnectedness, and distance," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    12. Winters, L. Alan, 1996. "Regionalism versus Multilateralism," CEPR Discussion Papers 1525, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Pickernell, David, 1997. "Less pain but what gain?: a comparison of the effectiveness and effects of Japanese and non-Japanese car assemblers' buyer-supplier relations in the UK automotive industry," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 377-395, August.
    14. repec:zbw:bofrdp:1988_019 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Xinshen Diao & Terry Roe & Agapi Somwaru, 2001. "What is the Cause of Growth in Regional Trade: Trade Liberalisation or RTAs? The Case of Agriculture," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 51-79, January.
    16. Franz Lang, 1990. "The counter-effects of market regulation," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 25(2), pages 72-76, March.
    17. Rolf Langhammer, 1991. "Import market penetration in services," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 26(6), pages 274-280, November.
    18. Jan Fagerberg, 1993. "Technology, Trade Structure and Economic Integration - An examination of Intra-Nordic, Nordic-EC and Intra-EC trade 1961-1987," Working Papers Archives 1993489, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    19. repec:got:cegedp:15 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. David Greenaway & Robert C. Hine, 1991. "Intra‐Industry Specialization, Trade Expansion and Adjustment in the European Economic Space," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 603-622, December.
    21. Skolnik, Amy, 1988. "The EC internal market: An "economic United States" of Europe," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 19/1988, Bank of Finland.
    22. Nicholas Crafts, 2021. "What can we learn from the United Kingdom’s post‐1945 economic reforms?," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 354-376, October.
    23. Richard Baldwin, 2008. "Big-Think Regionalism: A Critical Survey," NBER Working Papers 14056, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rvofce:ofce_0751-6614_1993_num_43_1_1304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ofce .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.