IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Une note sur l'effet d'échantillonnage

Listed author(s):
  • Emmanuelle Auriol

[eng] This paper analyses within a static model, the trade-off between the sampling advantage of duopolistic structures and the economies of scale of a monopoly. The duopoly structure provides a larger sample of producers that reduces expec­ted costs as the lowest of two possible total costs is used for final production - the sampling effect - but generates duplication of fixed costs. The optimal market structure (monopoly or duopoly) results from a trade-off between the fixed costs and the variable costs. Moreover since the firms are ex-ante asymmetric, it is not always the most efficient that produces at the optimum. The choice of the produ­cer is the result of a trade-off between variable and informational costs. [fre] Dans cet article, on étudie l'arbitrage qui existe entre les économies d'échelle associées à un monopole et le gain réalisé sur le coût variable d'acquisition quand on dispose au contraire d'un échantillon plus important : l'effet d'échantillonnage. On étudie la structure de marché optimale (monopole ou duopole) issue de cet arbitrage quand les paramètres de coût des entreprises sont indépendants mais différemment distribués. On montre que ce n'est pas nécessairement l'entreprise qui a un avantage technologique (au sens de la dominance stochastique) qui est sélectionnée à l'optimum d'information asymétrique de monopole, pas plus que ce n'est l'entreprise eflicace (celle qui a le coût marginal bas) qui est choisie à l'opti­mum de duopole.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License

File URL:
Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Revue économique.

Volume (Year): 47 (1996)
Issue (Month): 5 ()
Pages: 1179-1201

in new window

Handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1996_num_47_5_409843
Note: DOI:10.3406/reco.1996.409843
Contact details of provider: Web page:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Baumol, William J, 1982. "Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 72(1), pages 1-15, March.
  2. Laffont, Jean-Jacques & Tirole, Jean, 1987. "Auctioning Incentive Contracts," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 95(5), pages 921-937, October.
  3. Emmanuelle Auriol, 1993. "Monopole ou duopole: l'effet de comparaison," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 31, pages 1-31.
  4. repec:adr:anecst:y:1993:i:31:p:01 is not listed on IDEAS
  5. Dalen, D.M., 1995. "Yardstick Competition and Investment Incentives," Memorandum 33/1995, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
  6. repec:adr:anecst:y:1993:i:31 is not listed on IDEAS
  7. Joel S. Demski & David E.M. Sappington & Pablo T. Spiller, 1987. "Managing Supplier Switching," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 18(1), pages 77-97, Spring.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1996_num_47_5_409843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.