IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_1989_num_91_5_5148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Une difficulté d'interprétation de l'approche Logit : l'exemple de l'économie des transports

Author

Listed:
  • Pascal Bouyaux

Abstract

[fre] Une difficulté d'interprétation de l'approche Logit : l'exemple de l'économie des transports, . par Pascal Bouyaux.. . Cet article présente un tour d'horizon des fondements et interprétations traditionnels de l'approche Logit appliquée à la modélisation de la demande de transport urbain. Utilisant le concept de rationalité stochastique introduit par Falmagne (1978), il formalise le cadre théorique dans lequel McFadden (1974) a dérivé le modèle Logit de la maximisation d'une fonction d'utilité aléatoire. Ce cadre, correspondant exclusivement à la modélisation de l'hétérogénéité des préférences d'une population d'individus, reste trop étroit dans la mesure où il ne tient pas compte du caractère non répétitif du processus de choix des voyageurs. Aussi une formalisation alternative, développée à l'origine par Beggs, Cardell et Hausman (1981), est-elle présentée : le modèle Logit ordonné. Au-delà de l'hétérogénéité des préférences, cette nouvelle approche permet de rendre à la modélisation de la demande de transport urbain tout son caractère « behavionste ». [spa] Una dificultad de interpretación del enfoque Logit : el ejemplo de la economía de los transportes, . por Pascal Bouyaux.. . Este artículo presenta un panorama de los fundamentos e interpretaciones tradicionales del enfoque Logit aplicado a la modelización de la demanda de transporte urbano. Utilizando el concepto de racionalidad estocástica introducido por Falmagne (1978), formaliza el marco teórico del cual McFadden (1 974) derivó el modelo Logit de la maximización de una función de utilidad aleatoria. Este marco, que corresponde exclusivamente a la modelización de la heterogeneidad de las preferencias de una población de individuos, resulta demasiado estrecho en la medida en que no considera el carácter no repetitivo del proceso de elección de los viajeros. Así, se presentó una formalización alternativa, desarrollada en un principio por Beggs, Cardell y Hausman (1981) : el modelo Logit ordenado. Más allá de la heterogeneidad de las preferencias, este nuevo enfoque permite devolver a la modelización de la demanda de transporte urbano todo su carácter « behaviorista ». [eng] Problems arising in the Logit approach : an example from the transportation economy, . by Pascal Bouyaux.. . This article presents a survey of the traditional foundations and interpretations of a Logit approach, applied to the urban travel demand modelling. Using the notion of stochastic rationality introduced by Falmagne (1978), it formalises the theoretical framework from which McFadden (1974) derived the Logit model with the maximisation of a random utility function. This framework, corresponding solely to the modelling of preferences heterogeneousness of a population, is too limited because it doesn't take into account the non-repeated character of the travellers choice's process. Therefore, an alternative model is proposed, originally elaborated by Beggs, Cardell and Hausman (1981) : the ordered Logit model. Beyond the preferences' heterogeneousness, this new approach allows to give back to the urban travel demand modelling all his behavioral character. [ger] Die Problematik der Aussagekraft des Logit-Ansatzes : das Beispiel der Verkehrswirtschaft, . von Pascal Bouyaux.. . Dieser Artikel bietet einen Uberblick über die traditionellen Grundlagen und Aussagen des auf die Modellierung des Bedarfs an städtischen Verkehrsmittein angewandten Logit-Modells. Auf der Basis des von Falmagne (1976) eingeführten Konzepts der stochastischen Rationalität wird ein theoretischer Rahmen formalisiert, anhand dessen McFadden (1974) das Logit-Modell bezüglich der Maximierung einer zufallsbedingten Nutzenfunktion abgeleitet hat. Da dieser Rahmen ausschliesslich auf die Modellierung der heterogen gearteten Präferenzen einer Masse von Individuen abgestimmt ist, bleibt er insofern zu eng, als er den nichtrepetitiven Charakter der die Verkehrsmittelbenutzung betreffenden Entscheidungsprozesse nicht-berücksichtigt. Aus diesem Grund wird eine zuerst von Beggs, Cardell und Hausman (1 981) entwickelte Altemativformalisierung vorgestellt : das geordnete Logit-Modell. Ausser der Berücksichtigung der heterogenen Präferenzen erlaubt dieser neue Ansatz, das « behavioristische » Gepräge der Modellierung des Bedarfs an städtischen Verkehrsmittein hervorzuheben.

Suggested Citation

  • Pascal Bouyaux, 1989. "Une difficulté d'interprétation de l'approche Logit : l'exemple de l'économie des transports," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 91(5), pages 119-131.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1989_num_91_5_5148
    DOI: 10.3406/ecop.1989.5148
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1989.5148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.1989.5148
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_1989_num_91_5_5148
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecop.1989.5148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel McFadden, 1986. "The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 275-297.
    2. Beggs, S. & Cardell, S. & Hausman, J., 1981. "Assessing the potential demand for electric cars," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, September.
    3. McFadden, Daniel, 1974. "The measurement of urban travel demand," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 303-328, November.
    4. Winston, Clifford, 1985. "Conceptual Development in the Economics of Transportation: An Interpretive Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 23(1), pages 57-94, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samir Ghazouani & Mohamed Goaïed, 1993. "Analyse micro-économétrique de la demande de transport urbain pour la ville de Tunis," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 108(2), pages 47-62.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Hensher, David A., 2021. "The landscape of econometric discrete choice modelling research," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    2. Liu, Gang, 2007. "A behavioral model of work-trip mode choice in Shanghai," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 456-476.
    3. Daniel McFadden, 2014. "The new science of pleasure: consumer choice behavior and the measurement of well-being," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 2, pages 7-48, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Baltas, George & Doyle, Peter, 2001. "Random utility models in marketing research: a survey," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 115-125, February.
    5. Dennis Fok & Richard Paap & Bram Van Dijk, 2012. "A Rank‐Ordered Logit Model With Unobserved Heterogeneity In Ranking Capabilities," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(5), pages 831-846, August.
    6. Samir Ghazouani & Mohamed Goaïed, 1993. "Analyse micro-économétrique de la demande de transport urbain pour la ville de Tunis," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 108(2), pages 47-62.
    7. Yan, Jin & Yoo, Hong Il, 2019. "Semiparametric estimation of the random utility model with rank-ordered choice data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 211(2), pages 414-438.
    8. Aguilar, Francisco X. & Cai, Zhen, 2010. "Conjoint effect of environmental labeling, disclosure of forest of origin and price on consumer preferences for wood products in the US and UK," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 308-316, December.
    9. Qiang Fu & Jingfeng Lu, 2012. "Micro foundations of multi-prize lottery contests: a perspective of noisy performance ranking," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 38(3), pages 497-517, March.
    10. Jingfeng Lu & Zhewei Wang, 2016. "Axiomatization of reverse nested lottery contests," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(4), pages 939-957, December.
    11. Bairagi, Subir K. & Mohanty, Samarendu & Ynion, Jhoanne & Demont, Matty, 2017. "Determinants of Consumer Preferences for Rice Attributes: Evidence from South and Southeast Asia," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258384, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. José L. Oviedo & Hong Il Yoo, 2017. "A Latent Class Nested Logit Model for Rank-Ordered Data with Application to Cork Oak Reforestation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(4), pages 1021-1051, December.
    13. Nienhueser, Ian Andrew & Qiu, Yueming, 2016. "Economic and environmental impacts of providing renewable energy for electric vehicle charging – A choice experiment study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 256-268.
    14. Hongmin Li & Scott Webster & Gwangjae Yu, 2020. "Product Design Under Multinomial Logit Choices: Optimization of Quality and Prices in an Evolving Product Line," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1011-1025, September.
    15. Rotaris, Lucia & Giansoldati, Marco & Scorrano, Mariangela, 2021. "The slow uptake of electric cars in Italy and Slovenia. Evidence from a stated-preference survey and the role of knowledge and environmental awareness," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1-18.
    16. Laurent Ott & Mehdi Farsi & Sylvain Weber, 2021. "Beyond political divides: analyzing public opinion on carbon taxation in Switzerland," Chapters, in: Axel Franzen & Sebastian Mader (ed.), Research Handbook on Environmental Sociology, chapter 17, pages 313-339, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Breffle, William & Morey, Edward, 1999. "Investigating Heterogeneity of Preferences in a Repeated Logit Recreation Demand Model Using RP Data," Western Region Archives 321711, Western Region - Western Extension Directors Association (WEDA).
    18. Kassu Wamisho Hossiso & Aaron Laporte & David Ripplinger, 2017. "The Effects of Contract Mechanism Design and Risk Preferences on Biomass Supply for Ethanol Production," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 339-357, June.
    19. Aurélie Glerum & Lidija Stankovikj & Michaël Thémans & Michel Bierlaire, 2014. "Forecasting the Demand for Electric Vehicles: Accounting for Attitudes and Perceptions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 483-499, November.
    20. Daniel L. McFadden, 2013. "The New Science of Pleasure," NBER Working Papers 18687, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1989_num_91_5_5148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.