IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0331229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital product success under the microscope: When artificial intelligence in projects helps — and when it hurts

Author

Listed:
  • Mina Nikolić
  • Dragan Bjelica

Abstract

As organizations navigate an increasingly dynamic digital landscape, the challenge of achieving consistent product success has intensified. This study investigates how key management factors—customer-driven product development, open innovation networks, organizational digital agility, and AI-integrated project management—influence digital product outcomes. Special attention is given to the dual role of artificial intelligence: as a potential enabler of innovation and a possible constraint when applied in rigid or misaligned ways. A quantitative survey was conducted among 239 professionals engaged in product-related roles across diverse industries and regions. Data were analyzed using linear regression, moderation analysis, and non-parametric testing to assess both direct and interaction effects among the variables. The results reveal that customer-driven product development, open innovation networks, and organizational digital agility each have a statistically significant positive impact on product success, with customer-driven development emerging as the strongest predictor. In contrast, AI-integrated project management does not demonstrate a significant direct effect. Notably, AI negatively moderates the relationship between open innovation networks and product success, suggesting that while AI may enhance structured knowledge-sharing, it can also diminish the creative and collaborative elements essential for innovation if not carefully managed. These findings highlight the strategic complexity of integrating AI into digital product development. While AI can enhance operational efficiency and knowledge flows, its impact on innovation outcomes is context-dependent and may disrupt the balance between human creativity and automated decision-making. The study underscores the need for hybrid models in which AI complements—not replaces—human expertise. Insights from this research offer valuable guidance for organizations aiming to design resilient, customer-centric, and innovation-driven digital product strategies in an AI-enhanced environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Mina Nikolić & Dragan Bjelica, 2025. "Digital product success under the microscope: When artificial intelligence in projects helps — and when it hurts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-27, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331229
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331229
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0331229&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0331229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein, 2018. "Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 577-586.
    2. Morgan, Todd & Obal, Michael & Anokhin, Sergey, 2018. "Customer participation and new product performance: Towards the understanding of the mechanisms and key contingencies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 498-510.
    3. Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein & Askay, David & Eshraghi, Ali & Smith, Preston, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and knowledge management: A partnership between human and AI," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 87-99.
    4. Neil A. Morgan & Lopo Leotte Rego, 2006. "The Value of Different Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty Metrics in Predicting Business Performance," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 426-439, September.
    5. Cassiman, Bruno & Di Guardo, Maria Chiara & Valentini, Giovanni, 2010. "Organizing links with science: Cooperate or contract?: A project-level analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 882-892, September.
    6. Huigang Liang & Nianxin Wang & Yajiong Xue & Shilun Ge, 2017. "Unraveling the Alignment Paradox: How Does Business—IT Alignment Shape Organizational Agility?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 863-879, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robertson, Jeandri & Ferreira, Caitlin & Botha, Elsamari & Oosthuizen, Kim, 2024. "Game changers: A generative AI prompt protocol to enhance human-AI knowledge co-construction," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 499-510.
    2. Ramaul, Laavanya & Ritala, Paavo & Ruokonen, Mika, 2024. "Creational and conversational AI affordances: How the new breed of chatbots is revolutionizing knowledge industries," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 615-627.
    3. Rezaei, Mojtaba, 2025. "Artificial intelligence in knowledge management: Identifying and addressing the key implementation challenges," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    4. Hannigan, Timothy R. & McCarthy, Ian P. & Spicer, André, 2024. "Beware of botshit: How to manage the epistemic risks of generative chatbots," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 471-486.
    5. Ghasem Zaefarian & Constantine S. Katsikeas & Zhaleh Najafi-Tavani & Matthew J. Robson, 2025. "Unpacking when and how customer involvement as co-developer affects supplier new product performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 876-906, May.
    6. Harmancioglu, Nukhet & Grinstein, Amir & Goldman, Arieh, 2010. "Innovation and performance outcomes of market information collection efforts: The role of top management team involvement," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 33-43.
    7. Dominik M. Wielgos & Christian Homburg & Christina Kuehnl, 2021. "Digital business capability: its impact on firm and customer performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 762-789, July.
    8. Yeung, Matthew C.H. & Ramasamy, Bala & Chen, Junsong & Paliwoda, Stan, 2013. "Customer satisfaction and consumer expenditure in selected European countries," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 406-416.
    9. Siliang Tong & Nan Jia & Xueming Luo & Zheng Fang, 2021. "The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(9), pages 1600-1631, September.
    10. Shanyu Lin & Esra Sipahi Döngül & Serdar Vural Uygun & Mutlu Başaran Öztürk & Dinh Tran Ngoc Huy & Pham Van Tuan, 2022. "Exploring the Relationship between Abusive Management, Self-Efficacy and Organizational Performance in the Context of Human–Machine Interaction Technology and Artificial Intelligence with the Effect o," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    11. Michael Vössing & Niklas Kühl & Matteo Lind & Gerhard Satzger, 2022. "Designing Transparency for Effective Human-AI Collaboration," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 877-895, June.
    12. Tatsuya Kimura, 2022. "New Customer Satisfaction Index for the Japanese Market: From Net Promoter Score to Promoter Score Japan ," GATR Journals jmmr300, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    13. Borba, Rafael Lucas & de Paula Ferreira, Iuri Emmanuel & Bertucci Ramos, Paulo Henrique, 2024. "Addressing discriminatory bias in artificial intelligence systems operated by companies: An analysis of end-user perspectives," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    14. Yang Shen, 2024. "Future jobs: analyzing the impact of artificial intelligence on employment and its mechanisms," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1-33, April.
    15. Bodas Freitas , Isabel Maria & Geuna, Aldo & Lawson, Cornelia & Rossi, Federica, 2014. "How Industry Inventors Collaborate with Academic Researchers: The choice between shared and unilateral governance forms," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201401, University of Turin.
    16. Sun, Wenbin & Price, Joseph & Ding, Yuan, 2019. "The longitudinal effects of internationalization on firm performance: The moderating role of marketing capability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 326-337.
    17. Jose Ramon Saura & Rita Bužinskienė, 2025. "Behavioral economics, artificial intelligence and entrepreneurship: an updated framework for management," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-33, December.
    18. Xiangming (Tommy) Tao & Catherine L. Wang & Paul J. A. Robson & Mathew (Mat) Hughes, 2025. "How does team learning from failure facilitate new product performance? The double-edged moderating effect of collective efficacy," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 133-155, January.
    19. Elanor Colleoni & Flavia Bonaiuto & Laura Illia & Marino Bonaiuto, 2021. "Computer-Assisted Concept Analysis of Customer Centricity: A Review of the Literature on Employee Engagement, Culture, Leadership, and Identity Co-Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    20. Watson, Graeme J. & Desouza, Kevin C. & Ribiere, Vincent M. & Lindič, Jaka, 2021. "Will AI ever sit at the C-suite table? The future of senior leadership," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 465-474.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0331229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.