IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/125311.html

Repenser la Gestion des Connaissances à l’ère de l’IA Limites cognitives, tensions éthiques et enjeux organisationnels
[Rethinking Knowledge Management in the AI Era: Cognitive Boundaries, Ethical Frictions, and Organizational Challenges]

Author

Listed:
  • Achy, Lahcen

Abstract

In an era shaped by artificial intelligence, massive data flows, and growing organizational uncertainty, classical models of knowledge management (KM) are facing increasing limitations. Initially developed in relatively stable environments, these frameworks struggle to account for hybrid knowledge ecosystems, algorithmic mediation, and new cognitive tensions. This paper offers a critical and integrative reassessment of the main KM model families. It highlights key contemporary tensions, including knowledge reification, fragmentation of cognitive processes, and human deskilling. To address these challenges, the paper relies on the concept of composite cognitive ecology, which offers a new lens to understand the interplay between human and algorithmic agents in the production, transmission, and use of knowledge. The paper thus aims to open new avenues for research and action, fostering the emergence of organizations that are more learning-oriented, critical, and adaptive.

Suggested Citation

  • Achy, Lahcen, 2025. "Repenser la Gestion des Connaissances à l’ère de l’IA Limites cognitives, tensions éthiques et enjeux organisationnels [Rethinking Knowledge Management in the AI Era: Cognitive Boundaries, Ethical Frictions, and Organizational Challenges]," MPRA Paper 125311, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:125311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/125311/1/MPRA_paper_125311.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein, 2018. "Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 577-586.
    2. Scott D. N. Cook & John Seely Brown, 1999. "Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance Between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 381-400, August.
    3. Diogo E. Moreira da Silva & Eduardo J. Solteiro Pires & Arsénio Reis & Paulo B. de Moura Oliveira & João Barroso, 2022. "Forecasting Students Dropout: A UTAD University Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Patrick Cohendet & Laurent Simon, 2007. "Playing across the playground : paradoxes of knowledge creation in the videogame firm," Post-Print hal-00279260, HAL.
    5. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages 71-102, October.
    6. Stephen Gourlay, 2006. "Conceptualizing Knowledge Creation: A Critique of Nonaka's Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(7), pages 1415-1436, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feldman, Maryann P. & Kogler, Dieter F., 2010. "Stylized Facts in the Geography of Innovation," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 381-410, Elsevier.
    2. Daniel Geiger & Jochen Koch, 2008. "Von der individuellen Routine zur organisationalen Praktik — Ein neues Paradigma für die Organisationsforschung?," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 60(7), pages 693-712, November.
    3. Liubertė Irina, 2019. "On Social Knowledge and Its Empirical Investigation in Contemporary Organisations," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 81(1), pages 21-37, June.
    4. Chris Kimble, 2013. "Knowledge management, codification and tacit knowledge," Post-Print halshs-00826911, HAL.
    5. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Aslam, Muhammad Mahmood & Gantert, Till Marius & Kallmuenzer, Andreas, 2023. "New work design for knowledge creation and sustainability: An empirical study of coworking-spaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    6. repec:isv:jouijm:v:7:y:2018:i:2:p:199-216 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Sunday Bolade & Stavros Sindakis, 2020. "Micro-Foundation of Knowledge Creation Theory: Development of a Conceptual Framework Theory," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(4), pages 1556-1572, December.
    8. Doehne, Malte & Rost, Katja, 2021. "Long waves in the geography of innovation: The rise and decline of regional clusters of creativity over time," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    9. Gustafsson, Robin & Autio, Erkko, 2011. "A failure trichotomy in knowledge exploration and exploitation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 819-831, July.
    10. Maria Jakubik, 2018. "Practice Ecosystem of Knowledge Co-Creation," International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, ToKnowPress, vol. 7(2), pages 199-216.
    11. Ikujiro Nonaka & Georg von Krogh, 2009. "Perspective---Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 635-652, June.
    12. Abida Hafeez & Karim Bux Shah Syed & Fiza Qureshi, 2019. "Exploring the Relationship between Government R & D Expenditures and Economic Growth in a Global Perspective: A PMG Estimation Approach," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(4), pages 163-174, April.
    13. Nicolai J. Foss, 2012. "Linking Ethics and Economic Growth: a Comment on Hunt," Contemporary Economics, Vizja University, vol. 6(3), September.
    14. repec:ilo:ilowps:366690 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Croce, M.M. & Nguyen, Thien T. & Raymond, S. & Schmid, L., 2019. "Government debt and the returns to innovation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(3), pages 205-225.
    16. Arcalean, Calin & Glomm, Gerhard & Schiopu, Ioana, 2012. "Growth effects of spatial redistribution policies," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 988-1008.
    17. Chu, Angus C. & Cozzi, Guido & Furukawa, Yuichi, 2016. "Unions, innovation and cross-country wage inequality," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 104-118.
    18. Heijs, Joost, 2003. "Freerider behaviour and the public finance of R&D activities in enterprises: the case of the Spanish low interest credits for R&D," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 445-461, March.
    19. Arman Avadikyan & Gilles Lambert & Christophe Lerch, 2016. "A Multi-Level Perspective on Ambidexterity: The Case of a Synchrotron Research Facility," Working Papers of BETA 2016-44, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    20. Boucekkine, Raouf & del Rio, Fernando & Licandro, Omar, 2005. "Obsolescence and modernization in the growth process," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 153-171, June.
    21. Hui Yang & Jingye Li & Stefan Sieber & Kaisheng Long, 2025. "Does Digital Village Construction Affect the Sustainable Intensification of Cultivated Land Use? Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-24, April.
    22. Jeffrey Frankel, 2014. "Mauritius: African Success Story," NBER Chapters, in: African Successes, Volume IV: Sustainable Growth, pages 295-342, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:125311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.