IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/apecpp/v39y2017i1p41-64..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Elementary Students Substitute Ice Cream and Baked Goods for Healthier National School Lunch Program Meal Items?

Author

Listed:
  • Gabrielle F. Miller
  • Jaclyn D. Kropp
  • Sonam Gupta
  • Kelly A. Grogan
  • Anne Mathews

Abstract

We use variation in à la carte dessert availability to determine its impact on elementary school students’ selection of reimbursable meals and healthful meal components. On days when desserts (ice cream and baked goods) were offered, students were less likely to select a reimbursable meal, and students who purchased a dessert selected fruit significantly less often. Data were collected in the Alachua County School District (Florida) for three weeks in May of 2013. These findings suggest that students substitute desserts for reimbursable meals and the healthier fruit component. Policies, such as Smart Snacks in Schools, that regulate the nutritional content of a la carte items, but do not remove a la carte items from school lunchrooms, may be less effective than intended if such substitution occurs.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabrielle F. Miller & Jaclyn D. Kropp & Sonam Gupta & Kelly A. Grogan & Anne Mathews, 2017. "Do Elementary Students Substitute Ice Cream and Baked Goods for Healthier National School Lunch Program Meal Items?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 39(1), pages 41-64.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:39:y:2017:i:1:p:41-64.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/aepp/ppw011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mpr:mprres:5597 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Just, David R. & Wansink, Brian, 2009. "Smarter Lunchrooms: Using Behavioral Economics to Improve Meal Selection," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(3), pages 1-7.
    3. repec:mpr:mprres:5595 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Anne Gordon & John Hall & Eric Ziedman & Mary Kay Crepinsek & Melissa Clark & Elizabeth Condon, 2007. "School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Study III, Volume III: Sampling and Data Collection," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 50d861848f964b99bd2c5324c, Mathematica Policy Research.
    5. repec:mpr:mprres:5596 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ariun Ishdorj & Mary Kay Crepinsek & Helen H. Jensen, 2013. "Children's Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables: Do School Environment and Policies Affect Choices at School and Away from School?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 35(2), pages 341-359.
    2. Kang, Myong-Il & Ikeda, Shinsuke, 2016. "Time discounting, present biases, and health-related behaviors: Evidence from Japan," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 122-136.
    3. Craig Gundersen & David R. Just & Jason M. Fletcher & David E. Frisvold, 2017. "The Relationship between the School Breakfast Program and Food Insecurity," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 481-500, November.
    4. Waite, Alexandra & Goto, Keiko & Chan, Kenny & Giovanni, Maria & Wolff, Cindy, 2012. "Do Environmental Interventions Impact Elementary School Students’ Lunchtime Milk Selection?," 2012 AAEA/EAAE Food Environment Symposium 123513, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Kristin Kiesel & Mengxin Ji, 2021. "Did state‐mandated restrictions on sugar‐sweetened drinks in California high schools increase soda purchases in school neighborhoods?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 1443-1475, December.
    6. Kurz, Verena, 2018. "Nudging to reduce meat consumption: Immediate and persistent effects of an intervention at a university restaurant," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 317-341.
    7. Kiesel, Kristin & Stott, Amber, 2015. "Tracking Turnips and Other Measures of Food Literacy Education: The Impact of a School-based Intervention on Children’s Attitudes, Knowledge and Food Choices," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 206394, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Edwina Mingay & Melissa Hart & Serene Yoong & Alexis Hure, 2021. "Why We Eat the Way We Do: A Call to Consider Food Culture in Public Health Initiatives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-10, November.
    9. Christoph-Schulz, Inken & Weible, Daniela & Salamon, Petra, 2016. "Preferences for School Milk - How Juveniles Differ," 2016 International European Forum (151st EAAE Seminar), February 15-19, 2016, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 244518, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    10. David R. Just & Julius J. Okello & Gnel Gabrielyan & Souleimane Adekambi & Norman Kwikiriza & Putri E. Abidin & Edward Carey, 2022. "A Behavioral Intervention Increases Consumption of a New Biofortified Food by School Children: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(1), pages 124-146, February.
    11. Ferro, Gabrielle & Kropp, Jaclyn D. & Gupta, Sonam & Grogan, Kelly A. & Mathews, Anne, 2014. "À la Carte Offerings Effects on the Selection of Healthy National School Lunch Program Meal Components," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170622, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Chiara Lombardini & Leena Lankoski, 2013. "Forced Choice Restriction in Promoting Sustainable Food Consumption: Intended and Unintended Effects of the Mandatory Vegetarian Day in Helsinki Schools," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 159-178, June.
    13. Julie S. Downs & Jessica Wisdom & George Loewenstein, 2015. "Helping Consumers Use Nutrition Information: Effects of Format and Presentation," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(3), pages 326-344, Summer.
    14. Bridle-Fitzpatrick, Susan, 2015. "Food deserts or food swamps?: A mixed-methods study of local food environments in a Mexican city," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 202-213.
    15. Mary Kay Fox & Elizabeth Gearan & Charlotte Cabili & Dallas Dotter & Katherine Niland & Liana Washburn & Nora Paxton & Lauren Olsho & Lindsay LeClair & Vinh Tran, "undated". "School Nutrition and Meal Cost Study Final Report Volume 4: Student Participation, Satisfaction, Plate Waste, and Dietary Intakes," Mathematica Policy Research Reports ac91609c7ade415d91a82938c, Mathematica Policy Research.
    16. Newman, Constance & Guthrie, Joanne & Mancino, Lisa & Snelling, Anastasia, 2013. "School Meals Experiment: Can a Taste Test Increase Vegetable Acceptance?," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150504, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Maoyong Fan & Yanhong Jin, 2015. "The Effects of Weight Perception on Adolescents’ Weight-Loss Intentions and Behaviors: Evidence from the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-29, November.
    18. Hanks, Andrew S. & Just, David R. & Wansink, Brian, 2012. "Total Lunchroom Makeovers: Using the Principle of Asymmetric Paternalism to Address New School Lunchroom Guidelines," 2012 AAEA/EAAE Food Environment Symposium 123388, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Elizabeth C. Gearan & Kelley Monzella & Leah Jennings & Mary Kay Fox, "undated". "Differences in Diet Quality between School Lunch Participants and Nonparticipants in the United States by Income and Race," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 804e2d61138241eba62359e6f, Mathematica Policy Research.
    20. Amelie Griesoph & Stefan Hoffmann & Christine Merk & Katrin Rehdanz & Ulrich Schmidt, 2021. "Guess What …?—How Guessed Norms Nudge Climate-Friendly Food Choices in Real-Life Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    À la carte; competitive foods; child nutrition; food selection; National School Lunch Program; Smart Snacks in Schools Nutrition Standards;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:39:y:2017:i:1:p:41-64.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.