IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Free Cash Flow As Part Of Voluntary Reporting. Literature Review

Listed author(s):
  • Negrea Laura Georgeta


    (-, Facultatea de Stiinte Economice si Gestiunea Afacerilor Cluj-Napoca)

  • Matis Dumitru

    (Universitatea Babes Bolyai, Facultatea de Stiinte Economice si Gestiunea Afacerilor Cluj-Napoca)

  • Mustata V. Razvan


    (Universitatea Babes-Bolyai, Facultatea de Stiinte Economice si Gestiunea Afacerilor Cluj-Napoca)

The present study has as main objective to reflect the state of literature regarding free cash flow, and to withdraw the main pro's and con's in order to create an objective image upon this indicator. The main idea generating this research was the growing interest on cash flow reporting. As many say, "Cash Flow is King", while in Anglo Saxon countries the interest of investors and analysts in concentrated on operating cash flow, as the most important indicator of the probability of bankruptcy. In this context, voluntary additional reporting, like free cash flow may come either as an aid in providing the fair view or as an opportunistically reported figure. Throughout the paper, the intention was to provide answers to three main research questions: "What are the definition and calculation method of free cash flow? Why is there an interest in free cash flow reporting? What is the impact of free cash flow on the agency theory?" In order to provide relevant conclusions, four international data basis were used, and related articles and studies were extracted. The results proved that there is no generally accepted definition and computing method, while the format depends on the end-user of the report (shareholders, investors, analysts, bankers, a.s.o.). As stated below, this aspect generates confusion and lack of comparability, giving room to creative accounting techniques. Moreover, the interest on free cash flow reporting is connected mainly to liquidity assessment, company valuation and investors' choice. Still, in the context of agency theory, results show that in presence of high free cash flow, managers tend to make investment choices that satisfy their personal interest and that generate low efficiency and profitability for the company. The contribution to current state of research is providing a literature review study, focused on a comparative approach, as well as on underlying an objective image upon a debatable financial indicator and accounting report.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics in its journal The Annals of the University of Oradea. Economic Sciences.

Volume (Year): 1 (2011)
Issue (Month): 2 (December)
Pages: 591-596

in new window

Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2011:i:2:p:591-596
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Universitatii str. 1, Office F209, 410087 Oradea, Bihor

Phone: +40259408799
Fax: 004 0259 408409
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

in new window

  1. Dimitrios V. Kousenidis, 2006. "A free cash flow version of the cash flow statement: a note," Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 32(8), pages 645-653.
  2. Kathleen Fuller & Benjamin M. Blau, 2010. "Signaling, Free Cash Flow and "Nonmonotonic" Dividends," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 45(1), pages 21-56, February.
  3. Ryan Oprea, 2008. "Free Cash Flow and Takeover Threats: An Experimental Study," Southern Economic Journal, Southern Economic Association, vol. 75(2), pages 351-366, October.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2011:i:2:p:591-596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Catalin ZMOLE)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.