IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Residual State Property in the Czech Republic

  • Evžen Kočenda

Privatization in the Czech Republic was carried out under three programs: restitution, small privatization and large privatization. By far the most important privatization program in the Czech Republic was large-scale privatization that began in the spring of 1991. Large privatization allowed combinations of several privatization techniques. The largest firms were transformed into joint stock companies, the shares of which were distributed within voucher privatization (almost one half of the total number of all shares of all joint stock companies was privatized), sold for cash or transferred for free to municipalities. Despite the massive scale of the voucher privatization, there still remains a substantial number of companies where the state has been involved. The total number of 1849 companies of a book value of 367.5 billions entered both waves of voucher privatization. In 1998 the state has kept its involvement in 369 companies with the overall book value of more than 440 billions crowns. The book value of the state share in these companies amounted to almost 177 billions crowns. A great number of these companies was "privatized" through voucher privatization but the state did not privatize them entirely. An analysis showed that 76% of the assets (book value of the above companies) is possible to be influenced by the state. One cannot but to conclude that, despite the voucher privatization, the state sustained its influence over the significant part of the Czech economy. In view of the facts it seems legitimate to question the official success of the voucher privatization. There exist a clear consensus that further privatization of the residual state property is both necessary and inevitable.

(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4380190?origin=pubexport
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by M.E. Sharpe, Inc. in its journal Eastern European Economics.

Volume (Year): 37 (1999)
Issue (Month): 5 (October)
Pages: 6-35

as
in new window

Handle: RePEc:mes:eaeuec:v:37:y:1999:i:5:p:6-35
Contact details of provider: Web page: http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=106044

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as in new window
  1. Turnovec, Frantisek, 1999. "Privatization, ownership structure and transparency: how to measure the true involvement of the state," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 605-618, November.
  2. Aghion, Philippe & Blanchard, Olivier & Burgess, Robin, 1994. "The behaviour of state firms in eastern Europe, pre-privatisation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 1327-1349, June.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:eaeuec:v:37:y:1999:i:5:p:6-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Nguyen)

The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Chris Nguyen to update the entry or send us the correct email address

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.