IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v145y2017i4d10.1007_s10551-016-3130-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Need to Give Gratuitously: A Relevant Concept Anchored in Catholic Social Teaching to Envision the Consumer Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Bénédicte de Peyrelongue

    () (Institut des Hautes Etudes Economiques et Commerciales (INSEEC)
    Groupe de Recherche Anthropologie Chrétienne et Entreprise (GRACE))

  • Olivier Masclef

    (Groupe de Recherche Anthropologie Chrétienne et Entreprise (GRACE)
    IRCOM, Chair « Management du Travail Vivant »)

  • Valérie Guillard

    (Dauphine Recherche en Management (DRM))

Abstract

Abstract The “gift exchange theory” articulated by Marcel Mauss, along with his core concept of a threefold obligation (giving/receiving/returning), is the dominant theoretical framework used to explain the majority of gift issues in marketing. This perspective assumes that some interest always lies behind gifts, such that a gift always implies a counterpart of receiving something in return. Despite the relevance of this approach in understanding the day-to-day consumer behavior, this paper presents empirical cases where the consumer is also able to give freely, that is to say without implying a counterpart or even expecting it. To explain those empirical cases, we mobilize a key teaching of the Catholic Church: the “gratuitous gift” and then introduce the concept of the “need to give.” We show that gratuitousness is a relevant concept to understand most of gifts made by consumers, and we develop the normative aspect of gratuitous gift for ethical marketers (i.e., what ethical marketers should consider to understand consumers properly and in a more humanistic way). We also show that Catholic Social Teaching offers an appropriate anthropology to understand consumer behaviors motivated by this need for gratuitousness. To conclude, we propose further avenues of research.

Suggested Citation

  • Bénédicte de Peyrelongue & Olivier Masclef & Valérie Guillard, 2017. "The Need to Give Gratuitously: A Relevant Concept Anchored in Catholic Social Teaching to Envision the Consumer Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(4), pages 739-755, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:145:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-016-3130-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-016-3130-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-016-3130-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Sherry, 2008. "The Ethnographer’s Apprentice: Trying Consumer Culture from the Outside In," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 85-95, June.
    2. Markus Giesler, 2006. "Consumer Gift Systems," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(2), pages 283-290, August.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12849 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Sherry, John F, Jr, 1983. " Gift Giving in Anthropological Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 157-168, September.
    5. Lloyd Sandelands, 2009. "The Business of Business is the Human Person: Lessons from the Catholic Social Tradition," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 93-101, March.
    6. Bob M. Fennis & Loes Janssen & Kathleen D. Vohs, 2009. "Acts of Benevolence: A Limited-Resource Account of Compliance with Charitable Requests," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 35(6), pages 906-924, April.
    7. Kolm, Serge-Christophe, 2006. "Introduction to the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity," Handbook on the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism, Elsevier.
    8. Ashley, Christy & Noble, Stephanie M. & Donthu, Naveen & Lemon, Katherine N., 2011. "Why customers won't relate: Obstacles to relationship marketing engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(7), pages 749-756, July.
    9. Sacco, Pier Luigi & Vanin, Paolo & Zamagni, Stefano, 2006. "The Economics of Human Relationships," Handbook on the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism, Elsevier.
    10. Philippe Robert-Demontrond, 2011. "Les ambiguïtés sémantiques du commerce équitable : micro-mythanalyse des imaginaires de consommation," Post-Print halshs-00744380, HAL.
    11. Joan Fontrodona & Alejo Sison, 2006. "The Nature of the Firm, Agency Theory and Shareholder Theory: A Critique from Philosophical Anthropology," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 66(1), pages 33-42, June.
    12. Michel, Géraldine & Rieunier, Sophie, 2012. "Nonprofit brand image and typicality influences on charitable giving," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 701-707.
    13. Elster, Jon, 2006. "Altruistic Behavior and Altruistic Motivations," Handbook on the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism, Elsevier.
    14. Sherry, John Jr. & McGrath, Mary Ann & Levy, Sidney J., 1993. "The dark side of the gift," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 225-244, November.
    15. Belk, Russell W, 1976. " It's the Thought That Counts: A Signed Digraph Analysis of Gift-Giving," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(3), pages 155-162, December.
    16. Dennis McCann, 2011. "The Principle of Gratuitousness: Opportunities and Challenges for Business in «Caritas in Veritate»," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 55-66, March.
    17. Wooten, David B, 2000. " Qualitative Steps toward an Expanded Model of Anxiety in Gift-Giving," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 84-95, June.
    18. Czepiel, John A., 1990. "Service encounters and service relationships: Implications for research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 13-21, January.
    19. Joy, Annamma, 2001. " Gift Giving in Hong Kong and the Continuum of Social Ties," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 239-256, September.
    20. Price, Linda L & Arnould, Eric J & Curasi, Carolyn Folkman, 2000. " Older Consumers' Disposition of Special Possessions," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 179-201, September.
    21. Valérie Guillard & Céline Del Bucchia, 2012. "When Online Recycling Enables Givers to Escape the Tensions of the Gift Economy," Post-Print hal-00956942, HAL.
    22. Belk, Russell W & Coon, Gregory S, 1993. " Gift Giving as Agapic Love: An Alternative to the Exchange Paradigm Based on Dating Experiences," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(3), pages 393-417, December.
    23. Guglielmo Faldetta, 2011. "The Logic of Gift and Gratuitousness in Business Relationships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 67-77, March.
    24. Daiane Scaraboto, 2015. "Selling, Sharing, and Everything In Between: The Hybrid Economies of Collaborative Networks," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(1), pages 152-176.
    25. Jean-Sébastien Marcoux, 2009. "Escaping the Gift Economy," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(4), pages 671-685, December.
    26. Sandrine Frémeaux & Grant Michelson, 2011. "‘No Strings Attached’: Welcoming the Existential Gift in Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 99(1), pages 63-75, March.
    27. Eric J. Arnould & Craig J. Thompson, 2005. "Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 31(4), pages 868-882, March.
    28. Alma Acevedo, 2012. "Personalist Business Ethics and Humanistic Management: Insights from Jacques Maritain," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 105(2), pages 197-219, January.
    29. Wolfgang Grassl, 2011. "Hybrid Forms of Business: The Logic of Gift in the Commercial World," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 109-123, March.
    30. Éric Rémy & Richard Ladwein, 2014. "Sacré Noël," Post-Print hal-01867806, HAL.
    31. Sandrine Frémeaux & Grant Michelson, 2011. ""No Strings Attached": Welcoming the Existential Gift in Business," Post-Print hal-00797037, HAL.
    32. Renaud Garcia-Bardidia, 2014. "Se débarrasser d'objets sur leboncoin.fr. Une pratique entre don et marché ?," Post-Print hal-01369867, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:eee:joreco:v:48:y:2019:i:c:p:60-69 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:145:y:2017:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-016-3130-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Mallaigh Nolan). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.