IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/iaecre/v26y2020i1d10.1007_s11294-020-09775-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

History of Economic Thought as an Analytic Tool: why Past Intellectual Ideas Must Be Acknowledged as Lighthouses for the Future

Author

Listed:
  • Dieter Bögenhold

    (Alpen-Adria University Klagenfurt)

Abstract

Contemporaries tend to question certain belief systems including academic systems of knowledge. Paradigms evolve to become a subject of inquiry. The need to acknowledge history of economic thought as a neglected but important domain of economic inquiry as an important discussion topic. During recent decades, history of economic thought has largely been abolished and has disappeared from many contemporary teaching curricula in economics. The article argues that our academic understanding of economics is incomplete if we do not respect history and understand the social embeddedness of economic institutions and social behaviour. Of course, one must distinguish between history of intellectual ideas and economic history. Both items have to be discussed separately when assessing methodological appropriateness and benefits. The argumentation is based on the work of Joseph A. Schumpeter who dealt in detail with the question why and how to deal with historiography as a tool of proper economics in his substantial introduction to the 1945 book History of Economic Analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Dieter Bögenhold, 2020. "History of Economic Thought as an Analytic Tool: why Past Intellectual Ideas Must Be Acknowledged as Lighthouses for the Future," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 26(1), pages 73-87, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:iaecre:v:26:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11294-020-09775-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11294-020-09775-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11294-020-09775-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11294-020-09775-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marek Louzek, 2011. "The Battle of Methods in Economics. The Classical Methodenstreit—Menger vs. Schmoller," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(2), pages 439-463, April.
    2. Kenneth E. Boulding, 1971. "After Samuelson, Who Needs Adam Smith?," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 225-237, Fall.
    3. Paul M. Romer, 2015. "Mathiness in the Theory of Economic Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 89-93, May.
    4. Davis, John B., 2006. "The turn in economics: neoclassical dominance to mainstream pluralism?," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Gilbert Faccarello & Heinz D. Kurz (ed.), 2016. "Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume III," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13938.
    6. Dieter Bögenhold, 2008. "Economics, Sociology, History: Notes on Their Loss of Unity, Their Need for Re-integration and the Current Relevance of the Controversy between Carl Menger and Gustav Schmoller," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 37(2), pages 85-101, August.
    7. Vaughn, Karen I., 1993. "Why Teach the History of Economics?," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 174-183, October.
    8. Yuichi Shionoya, 2005. "The Soul of the German Historical School," The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences, Springer, number 978-0-387-23085-6, December.
    9. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/67ft27s7u58ocangahl1jigu6p is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Dieter Bögenhold, 2010. "From Heterodoxy to Orthodoxy and Vice Versa: Economics and Social Sciences in the Division of Academic Work," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(5), pages 1566-1590, November.
    11. M. Fourcade & E. Ollion & Y. Algan, 2015. "The Superiority of Economists," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 7.
    12. Marion Fourcade & Etienne Ollion & Yann Algan, 2015. "La superioridad de los economistas," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 17(33), pages 13-43, July-Dece.
    13. Claude Diebolt & Michael Haupert, 2018. "A cliometric counterfactual: what if there had been neither Fogel nor North?," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 12(3), pages 407-434, September.
    14. Ellie A. Fogarty & Michele I. Naples, 1998. "The Presence of History: A Survey of Articles on the History of Economic Thought and Methodology in the , 1969-1995," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 224-234, March.
    15. John B. Davis, 2016. "Economics Imperialism versus Multidisciplinarity," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 24(3), pages 77-94.
    16. Steven Kates, 2013. "Defending the History of Economic Thought," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13729.
    17. Mario Cedrini & Stefano Fiori, 2016. "Shifting Boundaries, Within and Outside Economics," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 24(3), pages 11-25.
    18. Greif, Avner & Mokyr, Joel, 2017. "Cognitive rules, institutions, and economic growth: Douglass North and beyond," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 25-52, March.
    19. Robert L. Heilbroner, 1979. "Modern Economics As a Chapter in the History of Economic Thought," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 192-198, Summer.
    20. Mario Cedrini & Magda Fontana, 2018. "Just another niche in the wall? How specialization is changing the face of mainstream economics [Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, and the sciences]," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(2), pages 427-451.
    21. Alessandro Roncaglia, 2014. "Should the History of Economic Thought be Included in Undergraduate Curricula?," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 3(1), pages 1-1, March.
    22. Maria Cristina Marcuzzo & Giulia Zacchia, 2016. "Is History of Economics What Historians of Economic Thought Do? A Quantitative Investigation," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 24(3), pages 29-46.
    23. Fernando Chafim, 2016. "Disciplinary Division within Social Sciences: Methodological Issues in Economic Imperialism and Economic Pluralism," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 24(3), pages 145-164.
    24. Gilbert Faccarello & Heinz D. Kurz (ed.), 2016. "Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume I," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13936.
    25. Morgan,Mary S., 2012. "The World in the Model," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107002975.
    26. Hodgson, Geoffrey M., 2017. "Introduction to the Douglass C. North memorial issue," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, March.
    27. Edward P. Lazear, 2000. "Economic Imperialism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 115(1), pages 99-146.
    28. Morgan,Mary S., 2012. "The World in the Model," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521176194.
    29. David Laidler, 2003. "The role of the history of economic thought in modern macroeconomics," Chapters, in: Paul Mizen (ed.), Monetary History, Exchange Rates and Financial Markets, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    30. Marion Fourcade & Etienne Ollion & Yann Algan, 2015. "The Superiority of Economists," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(1), pages 89-114, Winter.
    31. Gilbert Faccarello & Heinz D. Kurz (ed.), 2016. "Handbook on the History of Economic Analysis Volume II," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13937.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Nawaz Tunio & Mushtaque Ali Jariko & Tom Børsen & Sadia Shaikh & Tania Mushtaque & Mohsen Brahmi, 2021. "How Entrepreneurship Sustains Barriers in the Entrepreneurial Process—A Lesson from a Developing Nation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dieter Bögenhold, 2021. "Economics in the Social Science Spectrum: Evolution and Overlap with Different Academic Areas," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 49(4), pages 335-347, December.
    2. David Dequech, 2016. "Some Institutions (Social Norms And Conventions) Of Contemporary Mainstream Economics, Macroeconomics, And Financial Economics," Anais do XLIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 43rd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 006, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    3. Cléo Chassonnery-Zaïgouche, 2015. "Crossing Boundaries, Displacing Previous Knowledge and Claiming Superiority: Is the Economics of Discrimination a Conquest of Economics Imperialism?," STOREPapers 5_2015, Associazione Italiana per la Storia dell'Economia Politica - StorEP.
    4. Dieter Bögenhold, 2017. "Social-scienciation of Economics and its Consequences: On a Relative Convergence between Economics and Sociology," STOREPapers 3_2017, Associazione Italiana per la Storia dell'Economia Politica - StorEP.
    5. Sergio Mariotti, 2022. "The economics–engineering nexus: response to the commentaries," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(1), pages 1-29, March.
    6. Ambrosino, Angela & Cedrini, Mario & B. Davis, John, 2022. "Today’s economics: One, No One and One Hundred Thousand," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 202215, University of Turin.
    7. Thiago Dumont Oliveira & Marwil J. Dávila-Fernández, 2020. "From modelmania to datanomics? The rise of mathematical and quantitative methods in three top economics journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(1), pages 51-70, April.
    8. Jakob Kapeller & Stephan Puehringer & Christian Grimm, 2022. "Paradigms and policies: the state of economics in the German-speaking countries," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 1183-1210, July.
    9. Johansson, Dan & Karlsson, Johan & Malm, Arvid, 2020. "Family business—A missing link in economics?," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 11(1).
    10. Florentin Gloetzl & Ernest Aigner, 2015. "Pluralism in the Market of Science? A citation network analysis of economic research at universities in Vienna," Ecological Economics Papers ieep5, Institute of Ecological Economics.
    11. Christian Grimm & Jakob Kapeller & Stephan Puehringer, 2017. "Zum Profil der deutschsprachigen Volkswirtschaftslehre: Paradigmatische Ausrichtung und politische Orientierung deutschsprachiger Oekonom_innen (On the current state of German-speaking Economics: Para," ICAE Working Papers 70, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
    12. John Gibson, 2021. "The micro‐geography of academic research: How distinctive is economics?," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 68(4), pages 467-484, September.
    13. Vergara, Damian, 2015. "La economía y su pretensión de ciencia exacta: Un comentario respecto del ejercicio académico de la profesión," Estudios Nueva Economía, Estudios Nueva Economía, vol. 5(2), pages 17-24.
    14. Javdani, Moshen & Chang, Ha-Joon, 2019. "Who Said or What Said? Estimating Ideological Bias in Views Among Economists," MPRA Paper 91958, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Zamagni, Stefano, 2021. "The quest for an axiological reorientation of economic science," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 391-401.
    16. Dieter Bögenhold, 2017. "The order of social sciences: sociology in dialogue with neighbouring disciplines," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 27-52, November.
    17. John Hudson, 2017. "Identifying economics’ place amongst academic disciplines: a science or a social science?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 735-750, November.
    18. Franck Bailly, 2022. "When mainstream economics does human resource management: a critique of personnel economics’ prescriptive ambition," Post-Print hal-03711945, HAL.
    19. Corsi, Marcella & D’Ippoliti, Carlo & Zacchia, Giulia, 2019. "Diversity of backgrounds and ideas: The case of research evaluation in economics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    20. Turan Yay, 2021. "Method and scope in Joseph A. Schumpeter's economics: a pluralist perspective," Post-Print hal-03374881, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    History of economic thought; Methodology;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:iaecre:v:26:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11294-020-09775-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.