The turn in economics: neoclassical dominance to mainstream pluralism?
This paper investigates whether since the 1980s neoclassical economics has been in the process of being supplanted as the dominant research programme in economics by a collection of competing research approaches which share relatively little in common with each other or with neoclassical economics. A shortlist of the new approaches in recent economics includes game theory, experimental economics, behavioral economics, evolutionary economics, neuroeconomics, and non-linear complexity theory. Two hypotheses are advanced one regarding the relation between economics instruction and economics research and one regarding the nature of the economics research frontier to describe social-institutional practices that contribute to the replication of economics as a field. Two further hypotheses are advanced one regarding the boundaries of the field and one regarding how the field appraises itself to create a historical methodological framework for evaluating the question of change in economics and change in recent economics in particular. Finally, the paper distinguishes three leading explanations the breakdown view, the takeover view, and the maturity view of why neoclassical economics no longer dominates a mainstream economics.
Volume (Year): 2 (2006)
Issue (Month): 01 (April)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://journals.cambridge.org/jid_JOI
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:2:y:2006:i:01:p:1-20_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Keith Waters)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.