IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/hcarem/v28y2025i2d10.1007_s10729-025-09699-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reinforcement learning for healthcare operations management: methodological framework, recent developments, and future research directions

Author

Listed:
  • Qihao Wu

    (The University of Hong Kong)

  • Jiangxue Han

    (The University of Hong Kong)

  • Yimo Yan

    (The University of Hong Kong)

  • Yong-Hong Kuo

    (The University of Hong Kong)

  • Zuo-Jun Max Shen

    (The University of Hong Kong
    University of California, Berkeley)

Abstract

With the advancement in computing power and data science techniques, reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful tool for decision-making problems in complex systems. In recent years, the research on RL for healthcare operations has grown rapidly. Especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, RL has played a critical role in optimizing decisions with greater degrees of uncertainty. RL for healthcare applications has been an exciting topic across multiple disciplines, including operations research, operations management, healthcare systems engineering, and data science. This review paper first provides a tutorial on the overall framework of RL, including its key components, training models, and approximators. Then, we present the recent advances of RL in the domain of healthcare operations management (HOM) and analyze the current trends. Our paper concludes by presenting existing challenges and future directions for RL in HOM.

Suggested Citation

  • Qihao Wu & Jiangxue Han & Yimo Yan & Yong-Hong Kuo & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2025. "Reinforcement learning for healthcare operations management: methodological framework, recent developments, and future research directions," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 298-333, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:28:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10729-025-09699-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10729-025-09699-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10729-025-09699-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10729-025-09699-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:28:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10729-025-09699-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.