IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v151y2021ics1366554521001277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approximate dynamic programming for network recovery problems with stochastic demand

Author

Listed:
  • Ulusan, Aybike
  • Ergun, Özlem

Abstract

Immediately after a disruption, in order to minimize the negative impact inflicted on the society, its imperative to re-establish the interdicted critical services enabled by the infrastructure networks. In this paper, we study the stochastic network recovery problem that tackles the planning of restoration activities (considering limited resources) on interdicted infrastructure network links so that the pre-disruption critical service flows can be re-established as quickly as possible. As an illustrative case study, we consider a disaster scenario on a road infrastructure network that obstructs the flow of relief-aid commodities and search-and-rescue teams between critical service providing facilities and locations in need of these critical services. As in the case of many realistic applications, we consider the amount of demand for critical services as stochastic. First, we present a Markov decision process (MDP) formulation for the stochastic road network recovery problem (SRNRP), then we propose an approximate dynamic programming (ADP) approach to heuristically solve SRNRP. We develop basis functions to capture the important complex network interactions that can be used to approximate cost-to-go values for the MDP states. We conduct computational experiments on a set of small-scale randomly generated instances and demonstrate that the ADP approach provides near-optimal results regardless of the demand distribution and network topology. In order to develop a practical approach suitable for solving real world sized instances, we propose a framework where we first develop an ADP model and derive a policy on a spatially aggregated network of large scale instance. Next, we show the performance of this policy through computational testing on the large scale disaggregated network. Moreover, we provide managerial insights by assessing the importance of each basis function in the ADP model contributing to the recovery policies. We test this approach on a case study based on the Boston road infrastructure network. We observe that, as the urgency of re-establishing services increases or the resources become more scarce, the information gained from the network characteristics and short-term decisions should be the main driving factors to derive recovery policies. The results of all experiments strongly evidence the significance of utilizing the inherent network interactions and attributes to generate basis function sets for ADP models that yield high-quality recovery policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulusan, Aybike & Ergun, Özlem, 2021. "Approximate dynamic programming for network recovery problems with stochastic demand," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:151:y:2021:i:c:s1366554521001277
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2021.102358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554521001277
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gemma Berenguer & Pinar Keskinocak & J. George Shanthikumar & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan & Luk Van Wassenhove & Álvaro Lorca & Melih Çelik & Özlem Ergun & Pınar Keskinocak, 2017. "An Optimization-Based Decision-Support Tool for Post-Disaster Debris Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(6), pages 1076-1091, June.
    2. Igor Averbakh & Jordi Pereira, 2018. "Lateness Minimization in Pairwise Connectivity Restoration Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 522-538, August.
    3. Ben-Tal, Aharon & Chung, Byung Do & Mandala, Supreet Reddy & Yao, Tao, 2011. "Robust optimization for emergency logistics planning: Risk mitigation in humanitarian relief supply chains," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1177-1189, September.
    4. Novoa, Clara & Storer, Robert, 2009. "An approximate dynamic programming approach for the vehicle routing problem with stochastic demands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 509-515, July.
    5. Aybike Ulusan & Ozlem Ergun, 2018. "Restoration of services in disrupted infrastructure systems: A network science approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, February.
    6. Jonathan Patrick & Martin L. Puterman & Maurice Queyranne, 2008. "Dynamic Multipriority Patient Scheduling for a Diagnostic Resource," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 1507-1525, December.
    7. Hu, Shaolong & Han, Chuanfeng & Dong, Zhijie Sasha & Meng, Lingpeng, 2019. "A multi-stage stochastic programming model for relief distribution considering the state of road network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 64-87.
    8. Tuzun Aksu, Dilek & Ozdamar, Linet, 2014. "A mathematical model for post-disaster road restoration: Enabling accessibility and evacuation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 56-67.
    9. Zhong, Shaopeng & Cheng, Rong & Jiang, Yu & Wang, Zhong & Larsen, Allan & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2020. "Risk-averse optimization of disaster relief facility location and vehicle routing under stochastic demand," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    10. Dan Zhang & Daniel Adelman, 2009. "An Approximate Dynamic Programming Approach to Network Revenue Management with Customer Choice," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 381-394, August.
    11. L N Van Wassenhove, 2006. "Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(5), pages 475-489, May.
    12. Anton J. Kleywegt & Vijay S. Nori & Martin W. P. Savelsbergh, 2002. "The Stochastic Inventory Routing Problem with Direct Deliveries," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 94-118, February.
    13. Akbari, Vahid & Salman, F. Sibel, 2017. "Multi-vehicle synchronized arc routing problem to restore post-disaster network connectivity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 625-640.
    14. Nurre, Sarah G. & Cavdaroglu, Burak & Mitchell, John E. & Sharkey, Thomas C. & Wallace, William A., 2012. "Restoring infrastructure systems: An integrated network design and scheduling (INDS) problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 794-806.
    15. Moshe Dror & Gilbert Laporte & Pierre Trudeau, 1989. "Vehicle Routing with Stochastic Demands: Properties and Solution Frameworks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 166-176, August.
    16. Schütz, Hans-Jörg & Kolisch, Rainer, 2012. "Approximate dynamic programming for capacity allocation in the service industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 239-250.
    17. Burak Cavdaroglu & Erik Hammel & John Mitchell & Thomas Sharkey & William Wallace, 2013. "Integrating restoration and scheduling decisions for disrupted interdependent infrastructure systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 279-294, March.
    18. Nozhati, Saeed & Sarkale, Yugandhar & Chong, Edwin K.P. & Ellingwood, Bruce R., 2020. "Optimal stochastic dynamic scheduling for managing community recovery from natural hazards," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    19. Nihal Berktaş & Bahar Yetiş Kara & Oya Ekin Karaşan, 2016. "Solution methodologies for debris removal in disaster response," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 4(3), pages 403-445, September.
    20. Huseyin Topaloglu & Warren B. Powell, 2006. "Dynamic-Programming Approximations for Stochastic Time-Staged Integer Multicommodity-Flow Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 31-42, February.
    21. Nozhati, Saeed & Sarkale, Yugandhar & Ellingwood, Bruce & K.P. Chong, Edwin & Mahmoud, Hussam, 2019. "Near-optimal planning using approximate dynamic programming to enhance post-hazard community resilience management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 116-126.
    22. Melih Çelik & Özlem Ergun & Pınar Keskinocak, 2015. "The Post-Disaster Debris Clearance Problem Under Incomplete Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 65-85, February.
    23. Matthew S. Maxwell & Mateo Restrepo & Shane G. Henderson & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2010. "Approximate Dynamic Programming for Ambulance Redeployment," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 266-281, May.
    24. Fang, Yi-Ping & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2019. "Optimum post-disruption restoration under uncertainty for enhancing critical infrastructure resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1-11.
    25. Schmid, Verena, 2012. "Solving the dynamic ambulance relocation and dispatching problem using approximate dynamic programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 611-621.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nabavi, S.M. & Vahdani, Behnam & Nadjafi, B. Afshar & Adibi, M.A., 2022. "Synchronizing victim evacuation and debris removal: A data-driven robust prediction approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 689-712.
    2. Timperio, Giuseppe & Kundu, Tanmoy & Klumpp, Matthias & de Souza, Robert & Loh, Xiu Hui & Goh, Kelvin, 2022. "Beneficiary-centric decision support framework for enhanced resource coordination in humanitarian logistics: A case study from ASEAN," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Souza Almeida, Luana & Goerlandt, Floris & Pelot, Ronald, 2022. "Trends and gaps in the literature of road network repair and restoration in the context of disaster response operations," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Kuo, Hsin-Tsz, 2022. "Emergency logistics management—Review and propositions for future research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    5. Liu, Kanglin & Zhang, Hengliang & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2021. "The efficiency, equity and effectiveness of location strategies in humanitarian logistics: A robust chance-constrained approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Guowei & Zhu, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng & Xia, Jun, 2021. "Humanitarian relief network assessment using collaborative truck-and-drone system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Moreno, Alfredo & Alem, Douglas & Gendreau, Michel & Munari, Pedro, 2020. "The heterogeneous multicrew scheduling and routing problem in road restoration," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 24-58.
    3. Peter J. H. Hulshof & Martijn R. K. Mes & Richard J. Boucherie & Erwin W. Hans, 2016. "Patient admission planning using Approximate Dynamic Programming," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 30-61, June.
    4. Antoine Sauré & Jonathan Patrick & Martin L. Puterman, 2015. "Simulation-Based Approximate Policy Iteration with Generalized Logistic Functions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 579-595, August.
    5. Sanci, Ece & Daskin, Mark S., 2019. "Integrating location and network restoration decisions in relief networks under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 335-350.
    6. Sayarshad, Hamid R. & Du, Xinpi & Gao, H. Oliver, 2020. "Dynamic post-disaster debris clearance problem with re-positioning of clearance equipment items under partially observable information," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 352-372.
    7. Cheng, Cheng & Lu, Jia-Wei & Zhu, Rui & Xiao, Zuopeng & Costa, Alysson M. & Thompson, Russell G., 2022. "An integrated multi-objective model for disaster waste clean-up systems optimization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    8. Alkhaleel, Basem A. & Liao, Haitao & Sullivan, Kelly M., 2022. "Risk and resilience-based optimal post-disruption restoration for critical infrastructures under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(1), pages 174-202.
    9. Souza Almeida, Luana & Goerlandt, Floris & Pelot, Ronald, 2022. "Trends and gaps in the literature of road network repair and restoration in the context of disaster response operations," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    10. Ni, Ni & Howell, Brendan J. & Sharkey, Thomas C., 2018. "Modeling the impact of unmet demand in supply chain resiliency planning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-16.
    11. Zou, Qiling & Chen, Suren, 2021. "Resilience-based Recovery Scheduling of Transportation Network in Mixed Traffic Environment: A Deep-Ensemble-Assisted Active Learning Approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    12. Tianyu Wang & Igor Averbakh, 2022. "Network construction/restoration problems: cycles and complexity," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 51-73, August.
    13. Garay-Sianca, Aniela & Nurre Pinkley, Sarah G., 2021. "Interdependent integrated network design and scheduling problems with movement of machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 297-327.
    14. Ajam, Meraj & Akbari, Vahid & Salman, F. Sibel, 2019. "Minimizing latency in post-disaster road clearance operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1098-1112.
    15. Akbari, Vahid & Shiri, Davood & Sibel Salman, F., 2021. "An online optimization approach to post-disaster road restoration," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 1-25.
    16. Deng, Qichen & Santos, Bruno F., 2022. "Lookahead approximate dynamic programming for stochastic aircraft maintenance check scheduling optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 814-833.
    17. Aybike Ulusan & Ozlem Ergun, 2018. "Restoration of services in disrupted infrastructure systems: A network science approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, February.
    18. Poulin, Craig & Kane, Michael B., 2021. "Infrastructure resilience curves: Performance measures and summary metrics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    19. Xu, Min & Ouyang, Min & Hong, Liu & Mao, Zijun & Xu, Xiaolin, 2022. "Resilience-driven repair sequencing decision under uncertainty for critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    20. Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. & Rocco, Claudio M. & Barker, Kash & Moronta, Jose, 2018. "Quantifying the resilience of community structures in networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 466-474.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:151:y:2021:i:c:s1366554521001277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.