IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v66y2025i3d10.1007_s10614-024-10755-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Monopolization Inevitable in Proof-of-Work Blockchains? Insights from Miner Scale Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Aixing Li

    (University of Chongqing Jiaotong
    University of Chongqing Jiaotong)

  • Ke Gong

    (University of Chongqing Jiaotong)

  • Jiashun Li

    (University of Chongqing Jiaotong)

  • Li Zhang

    (Big Data and Optimization Research Institute, Chongqing Polytechnic University of Electronic Technology)

  • Xueting Luo

    (Qiqihar University)

Abstract

Blockchains use the Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism to ensure security. However, if a few large miners increasingly control most of the computing power (hashrate) on the blockchain, the blockchain may become inoperable. To investigate whether this concern materializes, we examine the impact of miners’ revenue (i.e., cryptocurrency price and cryptocurrency output volume) on computing power using dynamic panel analysis, instrumental variables, and various robustness tests on miners’ panel data in the Bitcoin blockchain from 2011 to 2024. We found that cryptocurrency prices and output volumes exert a positive effect on all miners’ computing power, with a notably stronger effect observed among smaller-scale miners. The cryptocurrency price has a more positive impact on small miners, whereas the volume of cryptocurrency output has a more positive impact on large miners. Although the decrease in cryptocurrency output caused by the deflationary cryptocurrency issuance mechanism inhibits miners’ computing power expansion, the scale of large miners is more stable than that of small miners in a fluctuating cryptocurrency market. Therefore, there is a risk of large miners monopolizing the blockchain.

Suggested Citation

  • Aixing Li & Ke Gong & Jiashun Li & Li Zhang & Xueting Luo, 2025. "Is Monopolization Inevitable in Proof-of-Work Blockchains? Insights from Miner Scale Analysis," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 66(3), pages 1825-1850, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:66:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10614-024-10755-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10614-024-10755-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10614-024-10755-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10614-024-10755-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:66:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10614-024-10755-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.