IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v71y2025i6p4643-4668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Worker Empowerment and Subjective Evaluation: On Building an Effective Conflict Culture

Author

Listed:
  • W. Bentley MacLeod

    (Department of Economics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027; and National Bureau for Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138)

  • Victoria Valle Lara

    (Law School, IE University, 28006 Madrid, Spain)

  • Christian Zehnder

    (Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland)

Abstract

Although conflicts typically lead to a waste of resources, organizations may still benefit from a corporate culture that tolerates or even encourages conflicts. The reason is that coordinated conflicts may help to enforce norms and foster cooperation. In this paper, we report results of a series of laboratory experiments designed to explore whether and under what conditions an efficiency-enhancing conflict culture can emerge. Using a principal-agent setup with subjective performance evaluation, we show that establishing a functional conflict culture is a delicate matter. If conflicts are encouraged in a careless hands-off manner, the destructive side of conflicts is likely to dominate. To be successful, a conflict culture requires a careful management of fairness norms. In our experiment, we find that conflicts have positive net effects on efficiency only if an explicit code of conduct is established and conflicts are institutionalized through a grievance process. Thus, providing workers with more power may be a necessary but not sufficient condition for improving productivity when performance evaluations are subjective.

Suggested Citation

  • W. Bentley MacLeod & Victoria Valle Lara & Christian Zehnder, 2025. "Worker Empowerment and Subjective Evaluation: On Building an Effective Conflict Culture," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(6), pages 4643-4668, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:6:p:4643-4668
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.03085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03085
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2022.03085?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:71:y:2025:i:6:p:4643-4668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.