IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jsd123/v10y2017i4p31.html

Determination Model of Suitable Coastal Transit-Oriented Development Location, Case Study: Paotere, Makassar

Author

Listed:
  • Andi Arief
  • Ananto Yudono
  • Arifuddin Akil
  • Isran Ramli
  • Amran Rahim

Abstract

Commuter and local society, the users of Paotere local port who took round trip to small islands and other island as well, experienced redundancy of cost, time and travel distance in fulfilling their whole needs at the shore of Makassar. Traveling by using motorized vehicle at the shore of Makassar was taken due to the unavailability of needed goods in the port and its neighborhood within radius 500 meters. This research is aimed at establishing determination model of suitable location for spatial planning of coastal Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in order to eliminate redundancy of cost, time and travel distance. It applied expert system and spatial analysis method based on geographic information system (GIS). The result showed that the most suitable location for coastal TOD development was in local Port and its neighborhood, it was at some grids, 581-585 and 540-542 within walking radius. Used determination model was determination in which, relied on highest value of the location with supports from its neighborhood location as well and the correlation among; certainty factor, commuter’s activity and local society.

Suggested Citation

  • Andi Arief & Ananto Yudono & Arifuddin Akil & Isran Ramli & Amran Rahim, 2017. "Determination Model of Suitable Coastal Transit-Oriented Development Location, Case Study: Paotere, Makassar," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(4), pages 1-31, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:10:y:2017:i:4:p:31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/download/67707/37980
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/view/67707
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Green, Colin P. & Heywood, John S. & Navarro, María, 2016. "Traffic accidents and the London congestion charge," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 11-22.
    2. Lazim Abdullah & Jin Yong Pang, 2016. "Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process for Assessing Sustainable Development among Underprivileged Communities," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(5), pages 1-70, September.
    3. Ali Soltani & Mohammad Hosseinpour & Ali Hajizadeh, 2017. "Urban Sprawl in Iranian Medium-sized Cities; Investigating the Role of Masterplans," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 122-122, February.
    4. Chakrabarti, Sandip, 2015. "The demand for reliable transit service: New evidence using stop level data from the Los Angeles Metro bus system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 154-164.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng Keat Tang & Jos van Ommeren, 2022. "Accident externality of driving: evidence from the London Congestion Charge [Pounds that kill: the external costs of vehicle weight]," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(3), pages 547-580.
    2. Bofinger, Peter & Feld, Lars P. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Schnabel, Isabel & Wieland, Volker, 2018. "Vor wichtigen wirtschaftspolitischen Weichenstellungen. Jahresgutachten 2018/19 [Setting the Right Course for Economic Policy. Annual Report 2018/19]," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201819.
    3. Green, Colin P. & Heywood, John S. & Navarro Paniagua, Maria, 2020. "Did the London congestion charge reduce pollution?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. Chakrabarti, Sandip, 2017. "How can public transit get people out of their cars? An analysis of transit mode choice for commute trips in Los Angeles," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 80-89.
    5. Sarker, Rumana Islam & Kaplan, Sigal & Mailer, Markus & Timmermans, Harry J.P., 2019. "Applying affective event theory to explain transit users’ reactions to service disruptions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 593-605.
    6. Andrea Baranzini & Stefano Carattini & Linda Tesauro, 2021. "Designing Effective and Acceptable Road Pricing Schemes: Evidence from the Geneva Congestion Charge," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 79(3), pages 417-482, July.
    7. Morton, Craig & Ali, Yasir, 2025. "The impact of congestion charging on car ownership: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 181-191.
    8. Herzog, Ian, 2024. "Microgeographic speed, reliability, and traffic externalities," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    9. Winston, Clifford & Yan, Jia, 2021. "Vehicle size choice and automobile externalities: A dynamic analysis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 196-218.
    10. Li, Tianshu & Song, Shunfeng & Yang, Yanmin, 2022. "Driving restrictions, traffic speeds and carbon emissions: Evidence from high-frequency data," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Fernando Gil-Alonso & Cristina López-Villanueva & Jenniffer Thiers-Quintana, 2022. "Transition towards a Sustainable Mobility in a Suburbanising Urban Area: The Case of Barcelona," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-32, February.
    12. Daniel Albalate & Xavier Fageda, 2019. "Congestion, Road Safety, and the Effectiveness of Public Policies in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Cheng Keat Tang, 2016. "Traffic Externalities and Housing Prices: Evidence from the London Congestion Charge," SERC Discussion Papers 0205, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    14. Lana Krehic, 2022. "How do increases in electric vehicle use affect urban toll ring prices?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 193(3), pages 187-209, December.
    15. Aney, Madhav S. & Ho, Christine, 2019. "Deadlier road accidents? Traffic safety regulations and heterogeneous motorists’ behavior," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 155-171.
    16. Lichtman-Sadot, Shirlee, 2019. "Can public transportation reduce accidents? Evidence from the introduction of late-night buses in Israeli cities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 99-117.
    17. Cao, Cong, 2024. "How to better predict the effect of urban traffic and weather on air pollution? Norwegian evidence from machine learning approaches," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 544-569.
    18. Muxin Zhai & Hendrik Wolff, 2021. "Air pollution and urban road transport: evidence from the world’s largest low-emission zone in London," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(4), pages 721-748, October.
    19. Ding, Hongliang & Sze, N.N. & Li, Haojie & Guo, Yanyong, 2021. "Affected area and residual period of London Congestion Charging scheme on road safety," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 120-128.
    20. Tyndall, Justin, 2021. "Pedestrian deaths and large vehicles," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 26.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:10:y:2017:i:4:p:31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.