IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijpsjl/v2y2010i1p12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust Discrimination Tendency in Average Citizens at In-nation and Out-nation Levels in Canada, China and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Jianghe Niu
  • Ziqiang Xin
  • Nico Martins

Abstract

The aim of the study was to explore discrimination tendency expressed in trust towards average citizens at in-nation and out-nation levels. A total of 370 Americans, Canadians and Chinese people, who were not university students, participated in the study. A self-developed questionnaire was used in the research, and the results from this sample showed a trust discrimination tendency. Specifically, trust towards the average citizens of one’s own nation tends to discriminate- the level of Americans’ trust toward Americans was measured as the lowest, the level of trust between Chinese and Chinese was measured as the highest, and Canadians’ in-nation trust was intermediate. People’s trust towards the citizens of other nations tends to discriminate as well- Americans trust Canadians more than they trust Chinese, Canadians trust Americans less than they trust Chinese and Chinese trust Americans slightly less than they trust Canadians. In-nation trust tends to discriminate with out-nation trust- People’s trust towards the citizens of other nations is likely to be either more or less than their trust towards citizens of their own nation. The study found an interesting phenomenon of heterogeneity of in-nation trust and homogeneity of out-nation trust- the variances of in-nation trust tend to be greater than those of out-nation trust. Furthermore, when participants were asked how they trust the average citizens of other nations, they seem to have relatively more similar opinions for those citizens in generally highly trusted nations; however, they seem to have relatively more diverse perspectives for those citizens in generally low trusted nations.Â

Suggested Citation

  • Jianghe Niu & Ziqiang Xin & Nico Martins, 2010. "Trust Discrimination Tendency in Average Citizens at In-nation and Out-nation Levels in Canada, China and the United States," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(1), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:2:y:2010:i:1:p:12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/download/6319/5049
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/view/6319
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sutter, Matthias & Kocher, Martin G., 2007. "Trust and trustworthiness across different age groups," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 364-382, May.
    2. Huff, Lenard & Kelley, Lane, 2005. "Is collectivism a liability? The impact of culture on organizational trust and customer orientation: a seven-nation study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 96-102, January.
    3. Andrew Weyman & Nicholas Pidgeon & John Walls & Tom Horlick‐Jones, 2006. "Exploring Comparative Ratings and Constituent Facets of Public Trust in Risk Regulatory Bodies and Related Stakeholder Groups," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(6), pages 605-622.
    4. Arnout van de Rijt & Vincent Buskens, 2006. "Trust in Intimate Relationships," Rationality and Society, , vol. 18(2), pages 123-156, May.
    5. Lenard Huff & Lane Kelley, 2003. "Levels of Organizational Trust in Individualist Versus Collectivist Societies: A Seven-Nation Study," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 81-90, February.
    6. Paul R. Brewer & Sean Aday & Kimberly Gross, 2005. "Do Americans Trust Other Nations? A Panel Study," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 86(1), pages 36-51, March.
    7. Mattias J. Viklund, 2003. "Trust and Risk Perception in Western Europe: A Cross‐National Study," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(4), pages 727-738, August.
    8. Nooteboom, B. & Berger, H. & Noorderhaven, N.G., 1997. "Effects of trust and governance on relational risk," Other publications TiSEM 8e83932e-064c-40e8-afe7-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chwo-Ming Joseph Yu & Tsai-Ju Liao, 2008. "The impact of governance mechanisms on transaction-specific investments in supplier-manufacturer relationships: A comparison of local and foreign manufacturers," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 95-114, February.
    2. Pascal Gantenbein & Axel Kind & Christophe Volonté, 2019. "Individualism and Venture Capital: A Cross-Country Study," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 741-777, October.
    3. Wyrwich, Michael & Steinberg, Philip J. & Noseleit, Florian & de Faria, Pedro, 2022. "Is open innovation imprinted on new ventures? The cooperation-inhibiting legacy of authoritarian regimes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(1).
    4. van den Akker, Olmo R. & van Assen, Marcel A.L.M. & van Vugt, Mark & Wicherts, Jelte M., 2020. "Sex differences in trust and trustworthiness: A meta-analysis of the trust game and the gift-exchange game," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Kwok, Diana W.P. & Meschi, Pierre-Xavier & Bertrand, Olivier, 2020. "In CEOs we trust: When religion matters in cross-border acquisitions. The case of a multifaith country," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4).
    6. Fabian Kosse & Thomas Deckers & Pia Pinger & Hannah Schildberg-Hörisch & Armin Falk, 2020. "The Formation of Prosociality: Causal Evidence on the Role of Social Environment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(2), pages 434-467.
    7. Hugh-Jones, David & Ooi, Jinnie, 2023. "Where do fairness preferences come from? Norm transmission in a teen friendship network," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Gianluca Marchi & Giuseppe Nardin, 2014. "Alleanze internazionali e mercati emergenti: l?esperienza del distretto ceramico di Sassuolo," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(2), pages 44-54.
    9. Fehr, Ernst & Glätzle-Rützler, Daniela & Sutter, Matthias, 2013. "The development of egalitarianism, altruism, spite and parochialism in childhood and adolescence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 369-383.
    10. Anthony Lima & Dongkyu Kim & Andrew M. Song & Gordon M. Hickey & Owen Temby, 2019. "Trust and Influence in the Gulf of Mexico’s Fishery Public Management Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-23, November.
    11. repec:wsi:acsxxx:v:21:y:2019:i:08:n:s1363919619500130 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Alpenberg, Jan & Paul Scarbrough, D., 2018. "Trust and control in changing production environments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 527-534.
    13. Lu, Weijie & Niu, Geng & Zhou, Yang, 2021. "Individualism and financial inclusion," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 268-288.
    14. Katharina Werner & Ahmed Skali, 2023. "Violent Conflict and Parochial Trust: Lab-in-the-Field and Survey Evidence," HiCN Working Papers 404, Households in Conflict Network.
    15. Gary Charness & Marie-Claire Villeval, 2009. "Cooperation and Competition in Intergenerational Experiments in the Field and the Laboratory," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(3), pages 956-978, June.
    16. Fabien Jean & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2014. "Convince me or commit me? Avoid the cognitive trap induced by Non-Human Actors in early stages of NPD," Post-Print hal-00976059, HAL.
    17. repec:dgr:rugsom:04g06 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Rebecca W. M. Lau & W. H. Mak, 2017. "Effectiveness of Workplace Interventions for Depression in Asia: A Meta-Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, June.
    19. Sumaira Rehman & Shahzad Ali & Muhammad Sajjad Hussain & Aamir Zamir Kamboh, 2019. "The Role of Physiological Contract Breach on Employee Reactions: Moderating Role of Organizational Trust," Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 7(2), pages :233-244, June.
    20. Patricea Elena Bertea & Adriana Zait, 2013. "Perceived risk vs. intention to adopt e-commerce - a pilot study of potential moderators," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 25(2), pages 213-229.
    21. Olof Johansson‐Stenman & Minhaj Mahmud & Peter Martinsson, 2009. "Trust and Religion: Experimental Evidence from Rural Bangladesh," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 76(303), pages 462-485, July.
    22. Dahlgrün, Philipp W. & Bausch, Andreas, 2019. "How Opportunistic Culture Affects Financial Performance in Outsourcing Relationships: A Meta-Analysis," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 81-100.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:2:y:2010:i:1:p:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.