IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijmsjn/v9y2017i3p24-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of the Online Shopping Behavior Patterns of Consumer Groups with Different Online Shopping Experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Shwu-Ing Wu
  • Hsin-Ti Tsai

Abstract

The appearance of Internet does not only bring changes to consumption patterns, but also to the business modes of companies, as a result of which Internet has become a perfect sales channel. When a consumer shops online, s/he might be influenced by a huge variety of factors. In this study, ABC model of attitude was adopted to investigate empirically the influences of website characteristics and external stimulus on consumers¡¯ online shopping behavior. A relationship model was also established to compare the differences of consumer groups with different online shopping experiences. Using convenience sampling, a total of 818 valid questionnaires were collected for the purpose of this study. Based on their online shopping experiences, consumers were divided into high frequency and low frequency groups in order to compare their consumption patterns as a group. According to the results, the two groups with different online shopping experiences were significantly different in three relational paths. To be specific: (1) Compared to the low frequency group, consumers in the high frequency group is more significantly positively influenced by website characteristics along the affection path during their online shopping. (2) Compared to the high frequency group, consumers in the low frequency group are more significantly positively influenced by website characteristics along the attitude path during their online shopping. (3) Compared with the low frequency group, a more significant positive influence is found among consumers in the high frequency group between consumer affection and consumer behavior path. These differences in the consumer behavior patterns of groups with different online shopping experiences according to the research results, therefore, could be used as references for online shopping business owners in their formulation of strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Shwu-Ing Wu & Hsin-Ti Tsai, 2017. "A Comparison of the Online Shopping Behavior Patterns of Consumer Groups with Different Online Shopping Experiences," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(3), pages 24-38, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijmsjn:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:24-38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijms/article/view/68518/37169
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijms/article/view/68518
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N/A, 2002. "Index to Clinical Nursing Research Volume 11," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 11(4), pages 463-466, November.
    2. Homer J. Hall, 2004. "Quality of information," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 55(1), pages 92-92, January.
    3. Park, Jin-Woo, 2007. "Passenger perceptions of service quality: Korean and Australian case studies," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 238-242.
    4. Belk, Russell W, 1975. "Situational Variables and Consumer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 2(3), pages 157-164, December.
    5. anonymous, 2002. "Latin America Research Group brief: After Argentina," Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Brief, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, issue Jan.
    6. Sanjeev Prashar & T. Sai Vijay & Chandan Parsad, 2017. "Effects of Online Shopping Values and Website Cues on Purchase Behaviour: A Study Using S–O–R Framework," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 42(1), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siti Hasma Hajar Mat Zin & Siti Haslini Zakaria & Rumaizah Che Md Nor & Nor Hidayah Hassim & CT Munirah Niesha Mohd Shafee & Suhanah Rosnan & Nur Syafizan Mohd Sufter, 2024. "Analyzing Consumers Online Shopping Behavior Using Different Online Shopping Platforms: A Case Study in Malaysia," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(2), pages 99-110.
    2. Clauzel, Amélie & Guichard, Nathalie & Riché, Caroline, 2019. "Dining alone or together? The effect of group size on the service customer experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 222-228.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie-Eve Laporte & Géraldine Michel & Sophie Rieunier, 2017. "Towards a better understanding of eating behaviour through the concept of Perception of Nutritional Risk," Post-Print halshs-02923251, HAL.
    2. Sutthipong Meeyai, 2015. "Modeling Store Patronage: A Systematic Review," International Conference on Marketing and Business Development Journal, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 40-48, July.
    3. Elena Kossmann & Mónica Gómez-Suárez, 2018. "Decision-making processes for purchases of ethical products: gaps between academic research and needs of marketing practitioners," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(3), pages 353-370, September.
    4. Toma Andrei, 2021. "Strategies Used By Retailers To Influence Buyers," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 43-48, December.
    5. Calderwood, Eric & Freathy, Paul, 2014. "Consumer mobility in the Scottish isles: The impact of internet adoption upon retail travel patterns," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 192-203.
    6. LEMOINE, Jean-François & PLICHON, Véronique, 2000. "Le rôle des facteurs situationnels dans l'explication des réactions affectives du consommateur à l'intérieur d'un point de vente. / The Role of Situational Factors in the Understanding of Consumer Aff," LEG - CERMAB / Centre de Recherche en Marketing de Bourgogne - Cahier de recherche 2000-04, LEG - CERMAB, CNRS UMR 5118, Université de Bourgogne.
    7. DeSarbo, Wayne S. & Selin Atalay, A. & Blanchard, Simon J., 2009. "A three-way clusterwise multidimensional unfolding procedure for the spatial representation of context dependent preferences," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 3217-3230, June.
    8. Sha Zhang & Xiting Wu & Yonggui Wang & Peiqi Jiang, 2024. "Does time of day affect consumers’ price sensitivity?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Nils Gutacker & Andrew Street, 2015. "Multidimensional performance assessment using dominance criteria," Working Papers 115cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    10. Ravula, Prashanth & Bhatnagar, Amit & Ghose, Sanjoy, 2020. "Antecedents and consequences of cross-effects: An empirical analysis of omni-coupons," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 405-420.
    11. Haifeng Zhao & Nosherwan Khaliq & Chunling Li & Judit Oláh, 2024. "In quest of perceived transaction cost’s impact on fintech users’ intention: the moderating role of situational factors," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Shyh-Ming Huang & Shyh-Rong Fang & Shih-Chieh Fang & Chao-Chin Huang, 2016. "The influences of brand benefits on brand loyalty: Intermediate mechanisms," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 41(1), pages 141-160, February.
    13. Fujita, Momoko & Harrigan, Paul & Soutar, Geoffrey N. & Kumar Roy, Sanjit & Roy, Rajat, 2020. "Enhancing member-institution relationships through social media: The role of other-user engagement behavior and similarity perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 642-654.
    14. Alden, Dana L. & He, Yi & Chen, Qimei, 2010. "Service recommendations and customer evaluations in the international marketplace: Cultural and situational contingencies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 38-44, January.
    15. Lulu Wang & Hu Yu & Bin Zhou, 2025. "Formation mechanism of tourists’ pro-environmental behavior in plateau ecotourism destination," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Kim, Jikyung (Jeanne) & Kim, Sanghwa & Choi, Jeonghye, 2020. "Purchase now and consume later: Do online and offline environments drive online social interactions and sales?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 274-285.
    17. Jerry Yuwen Shiu & Shi Ting Liao & Shian-Yang Tzeng, 2023. "How does online streaming reform e-commerce? An empirical assessment of immersive experience and social interaction in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    18. Agustin V. Ruiz Vega & Consuelo Riano Gil & Carla Di Pierri Del Vecchio, 2014. "Do Low Price Signals Influence Online Purchases of Tourist Accommodation Services? The Moderating Role of Gender," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(4), pages 96-111, December.
    19. Özlem Atalık & Mahmut Bakır & Şahap Akan, 2019. "The Role of In-Flight Service Quality on Value for Money in Business Class: A Logit Model on the Airline Industry," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, March.
    20. Veronika Jadczaková, 2013. "Review of segmentation process in consumer markets," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 61(4), pages 1215-1224.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    online shopping; website characteristics; external stimulus;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijmsjn:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:24-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.