IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijefaa/v18y2026i3p54.html

Does the COVID-19 Pandemic Highlights the Value of Firm’s ESG Performance?

Author

Listed:
  • Ching-Feng Chen
  • Yuan Chang

Abstract

This study investigates whether Environmental, Social, and Governance performance mitigates the adverse impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on firm financial performance using panel data for non-financial firms listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange and the Taipei Exchange from 2016 to 2023. We employ multiple ESG proxies, including aggregate ESG ratings and score, disaggregated ESG scores, industry-adjusted rankings, and an extensive set of firm-level financial and governance controls, and estimate the models using regression analysis. The results show that firm financial performance deteriorated significantly during the COVID-19 period. However, firms with stronger ESG performance experienced markedly smaller performance declines, consistent with an insurance-like role of ESG. This moderating effect is most pronounced for the governance and social dimensions, indicating that robust ESG practices enhance firms’ ability to absorb exogenous shocks. Overall, the findings highlight ESG performance as a resilience mechanism that supports financial stability and sustainable competitiveness. From a practical standpoint, the evidence suggests that firms should integrate ESG considerations into core strategic and risk management processes, while policymakers may promote ESG adoption to strengthen capital market resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Ching-Feng Chen & Yuan Chang, 2026. "Does the COVID-19 Pandemic Highlights the Value of Firm’s ESG Performance?," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(3), pages 1-54, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/download/0/0/52891/57664
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/0/52891
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yonghong Jia & Xinghua Gao & Scott Julian, 2020. "Do firms use corporate social responsibility to insure against stock price risk? Evidence from a natural experiment," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 290-307, February.
    2. Ji-Ying Fang & Wen-Sheng Wang, 2024. "The Impact of ESG on Corporate Financing Decisions Before and After Covid-19: Evidence from Taiwan," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 14(4), pages 1-1.
    3. Sheng-Hung Chen & Hao-Cheng Hsu & Shih-Ting Lin, 2025. "The Joint Effects of Firm’s Globalization and ESG Rating on Financial Performance: Evidence from Food Industry in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-30, March.
    4. Fama, Eugene F, 1980. "Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 88(2), pages 288-307, April.
    5. Chang, Shun-Fen & Chen, Bai-Sian & Chen, Hong-Yi & Chen, Hsiao-Yin, 2025. "The impact of ESG ratings on firm risks in Taiwan's market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Beata Milewska, 2022. "The Impact of Instability in the Business Environment on the Competitiveness of Enterprises Using the Example of the Apparel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang Wenge, 2018. "Board Independence of Listed Companies in the US and China," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Sang Cheol Lee & Mooweon Rhee & Jongchul Yoon, 2018. "Foreign Monitoring and Audit Quality: Evidence from Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Baarda, James R., 2003. "Current Law & Economics Debates: Tools for Assessing Fundamental Cooperative Changes?," 2003 Annual Meeting, October 29 31802, NCERA-194 Research on Cooperatives.
    4. Shaikh, Ibrahim A. & O'Brien, Jonathan Paul & Peters, Lois, 2018. "Inside directors and the underinvestment of financial slack towards R&D-intensity in high-technology firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 192-201.
    5. Brickley, James A. & Linck, James S. & Coles, Jeffrey L., 1999. "What happens to CEOs after they retire? New evidence on career concerns, horizon problems, and CEO incentives," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 341-377, June.
    6. Tom Coupé & Valérie Smeets & Frédéric Warzynski, 2006. "Incentives, Sorting and Productivity along the Career: Evidence from a Sample of Top Economists," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 137-167, April.
    7. William S. Schulze & Michael H. Lubatkin & Richard N. Dino, 2002. "Altruism, agency, and the competitiveness of family firms," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(4-5), pages 247-259.
    8. Dirk Sliwka, 2001. "On the Costs and Benefits of Delegation in Organizations," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 157(4), pages 568-590, December.
    9. Hoontaek Seo & Sangho Yi & William McCumber, 2024. "Friendly Boards and the Cost of Debt," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, July.
    10. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2007-059 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Charlie Weir & Oleksandr Talavera & Alexander Muravyev, 2011. "The Return on Human Capital: the Case of UK Non-executive Directors that are also Executive Directors," University of East Anglia Applied and Financial Economics Working Paper Series 029, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    12. Etienne Redor & Magnus Blomkvist, 2021. "Do all inside and affiliated directors hold the same value for shareholders?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(3), pages 882-895.
    13. Agnès Labye & Christine Lagoutte & Françoise Renversez, 2002. "Banques mutualistes et systèmes financiers : une analyse comparative Allemagne, Grande-Bretagne, France," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 67(3), pages 85-109.
    14. Martin Kyere & Marcel Ausloos, 2021. "Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 1871-1885, April.
    15. Al-Najjar, Basil & Salama, Aly, 2022. "Mind the gap: Are female directors and executives more sensitive to the environment in high-tech us firms?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    16. Z. Jun Lin & Shengqiang Liu & Fangcheng Sun, 2017. "The Impact of Financing Constraints and Agency Costs on Corporate R&D Investment: Evidence from China," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 17(1), pages 3-42, March.
    17. Glenn Boyle & Graeme Guthrie & Luke Gorton, 2010. "Holding onto Your Horses: Conflicts of Interest in Asset Management," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 53(4), pages 689-713.
    18. Kevin Ghislain Adjé, 2018. "Determinants of Bank Credit Risk in Developing Economies: Evidence from Benin," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(4), pages 154-163, April.
    19. Kim, Jongwook & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2008. "A Strategic Theory of the Firm as a Nexus of Incomplete Contracts: A Property Rights Approach," Working Papers 08-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    20. Ferrell, Allen & Liang, Hao & Renneboog, Luc, 2016. "Socially responsible firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 585-606.
    21. Robert E. Till & Mary Beth Yount, 2019. "Governance and Incentives: Is It Really All about the Money?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 605-618, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:18:y:2026:i:3:p:54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.