IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ibrjnl/v16y2023i7p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Work-Family Roles Dynamics during Home-Based Teleworking

Author

Listed:
  • Olawunmi Elizabeth Eniola

Abstract

Teleworking from home gives workers some degree of temporal and spatial flexibility, and at the same time, poses some consequences in terms of conflicts from the demands, requirements, expectations, and behaviors from the forces associated with both work roles and family roles. This integrative literature review investigated the conditions or forces that are responsible for the bi-directional inter-role conflict and the outcomes of the conflict when employees are teleworking from home, by synthesizing new and grey literature about work-family conflict and home-based teleworking. The forces from the work and family systems which are organizational, personal, spatial, temporal, technological, psychological, and familial are the crux of the work-to-family conflict and family-to-work conflict as they either cause friction or smoothness to the transition from work roles to family roles and vice versa during home-based teleworking. The forces either act as catalysts or inhibitors during the transition from work (family) roles to family (work) roles. The findings from this review were synthesized into the work-family roles dynamics model by incorporating concepts from physical sciences. The work-family roles dynamics model provides insights into the transition of home-based teleworkers and the work-to-family conflict and family-to-work conflict that ensue in the work and family systems. This article also offers a definition of work-family conflict based on knowledge from the synthesized literature. The work-family roles dynamics model posits new explanations about teleworking from home and bi-directional inter-role conflict. The work-family roles dynamics theory yields new ideas and questions for future research and implications for human resource management.

Suggested Citation

  • Olawunmi Elizabeth Eniola, 2023. "The Work-Family Roles Dynamics during Home-Based Teleworking," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(7), pages 1-1, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:16:y:2023:i:7:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/download/0/0/48920/52729
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/0/48920
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iduzki Soubelet-Fagoaga & Maitane Arnoso-Martinez & Edurne Elgorriaga-Astondoa & Edurne Martínez-Moreno, 2022. "Telework and Face-to-Face Work during COVID-19 Confinement: The Predictive Factors of Work-Related Stress from a Holistic Point of View," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Magnus Moglia & John Hopkins & Anne Bardoel, 2021. "Telework, Hybrid Work and the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals: Towards Policy Coherence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Luis Duque & Renato Costa & Álvaro Dias & Leandro Pereira & José Santos & Nelson António, 2020. "New Ways of Working and the Physical Environment to Improve Employee Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frédéric Cornu, 2022. "New Ways of Working and Employee In-Role Performance in Swiss Public Administration," Merits, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Jorge de Andrés-Sánchez, 2023. "A Configurational Evaluation of Spanish Teleworkers’ Perception and Nonperception of Stress during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Bruna Ferrara & Martina Pansini & Clara De Vincenzi & Ilaria Buonomo & Paula Benevene, 2022. "Investigating the Role of Remote Working on Employees’ Performance and Well-Being: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Ioana Gutu & Camelia Nicoleta Medeleanu, 2023. "Assessing Teleworkforce and Electronic Leadership Favorable for an Online Workforce Sustainability Framework by Using PLS SEM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-32, September.
    5. Cezary Kuśnierz & Aleksandra M. Rogowska & Karolina Chilicka & Iuliia Pavlova & Dominika Ochnik, 2022. "Associations of Work-Family Conflict with Family-Specific, Work-Specific, and Well-Being-Related Variables in a Sample of Polish and Ukrainian Adults during the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-20, September.
    6. M. Ángeles López-Cabarcos & Analía López-Carballeira & Carlos Ferro-Soto, 2020. "New Ways of Working and Public Healthcare Professionals’ Well-Being: The Response to Face the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-9, September.
    7. Angelica Nicoleta Neculaesei & Sebastian Tocar, 2023. "Determinants of Perceived Performance during Telework: Evidence from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Carmen-Alexandra Stoian & Chirața Caraiani & Ionuț Florin Anica-Popa & Cornelia Dascălu & Camelia Iuliana Lungu, 2022. "Telework Systematic Model Design for the Future of Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    9. Sónia Magalhães & Joselina Barbosa & Elisabete Borges, 2022. "Presenteeism in Non-Academic Staff in a Public University Context: Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Reasons to Work While Sick during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-12, November.
    10. Alessandro De Carlo & Damiano Girardi & Laura Dal Corso & Elvira Arcucci & Alessandra Falco, 2022. "Out of Sight, Out of Mind? A Longitudinal Investigation of Smart Working and Burnout in the Context of the Job Demands–Resources Model during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Stephen Glackin & Magnus Moglia & Peter Newton, 2022. "Working from Home as a Catalyst for Urban Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, October.
    12. Martyna Joanna Surma & Richard Joseph Nunes & Caroline Rook & Angela Loder, 2021. "Assessing Employee Engagement in a Post-COVID-19 Workplace Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    13. Hang To Diem Tran & Minsook Kim, 2023. "Factors Influencing the Continued Intent to Use Virtual Interactive Platforms in Korean Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises for Remote and Hybrid Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Manuel Au-Yong-Oliveira & Maria José Sousa, 2022. "Sustainable Marketing and Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-3, March.
    15. John Hopkins & Anne Bardoel, 2023. "The Future Is Hybrid: How Organisations Are Designing and Supporting Sustainable Hybrid Work Models in Post-Pandemic Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    16. Agota Giedrė Raišienė & Evelina Danauskė & Karolina Kavaliauskienė & Vida Gudžinskienė, 2023. "Occupational Stress-Induced Consequences to Employees in the Context of Teleworking from Home: A Preliminary Study," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    17. Magnus Moglia & Stephen Glackin & John L. Hopkins, 2022. "The Working-from-Home Natural Experiment in Sydney, Australia: A Theory of Planned Behaviour Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    18. Ioanna Simeli & Georgios Tsekouropoulos & Anastasia Vasileiou & Greta Hoxha, 2023. "Benefits and Challenges of Teleworking for a Sustainable Future: Knowledge Gained through Experience in the Era of COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-30, July.
    19. Branden M. Deiss & Mallori Herishko & Lauren Wright & Michelle Maliborska & J. Patrick Abulencia, 2021. "Analysis of Energy Consumption in Commercial and Residential Buildings in New York City before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:16:y:2023:i:7:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.