IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i7p1218-d104281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation Capability and Innovation Talents: Evidence from China Based on a Quantile Regression Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Fenfen Wei

    (School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

  • Nanping Feng

    (School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

  • Kevin H. Zhang

    (Department of Economics, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790-4200, USA)

Abstract

Innovation talents, as a most active and important resource in innovation activities, are receiving increasing attention in the enhancement of innovation capability. It seems that areas with strong innovation capability are more attractive to innovation talents. To explore the impact of innovation capability—measured by innovation environment input efficiency—on the distribution of innovation talent, and given the heavy-tailed distribution of talents, a quantile regression approach is adopted for Chinese data covering 2001–2015. The results show that: (a) at the country level, the innovation environment and innovation talents are surprisingly negatively related due to pre-reform special regional strategies and the immature innovation environment in China, while both innovation input and efficiency facilitates the agglomeration of innovation talent; and (b) at the regional level, some different influences on talents appear: the strongest negative impact of the innovation environment is in the areas with a low level of talents, moderate positive effects of innovation input and efficiency can be seen in areas with a medium level of talents, and significantly positive contributions from innovation input and efficiency can be seen in the areas that already have a high level of talents. The results offer some suggestions for managers and the government, which are beneficial for the guidance of the ordered flow of innovation talents and the enhancement of regional innovation capability and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Fenfen Wei & Nanping Feng & Kevin H. Zhang, 2017. "Innovation Capability and Innovation Talents: Evidence from China Based on a Quantile Regression Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:7:p:1218-:d:104281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/7/1218/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/7/1218/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fleisher, Belton & Li, Haizheng & Zhao, Min Qiang, 2010. "Human capital, economic growth, and regional inequality in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 215-231, July.
    2. Ira Horowitz, 1966. "Some Aspects of the Effects of the Regional Distribution of Scientific Talent on Regional Economic Activity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 217-232, November.
    3. Koenker, Roger, 2004. "Quantile regression for longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 74-89, October.
    4. Ungkyu Han & Mette Asmild & Martin Kunc, 2016. "Regional R&D Efficiency in Korea from Static and Dynamic Perspectives," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(7), pages 1170-1184, July.
    5. Amitrajeet Batabyal & Peter Nijkamp, 2013. "A multi-region model of economic growth with human capital and negative externalities in innovation," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 909-924, September.
    6. Palivos, Theodore & Wang, Ping, 1996. "Spatial agglomeration and endogenous growth," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 645-669, December.
    7. Furman, Jeffrey L. & Hayes, Richard, 2004. "Catching up or standing still?: National innovative productivity among 'follower' countries, 1978-1999," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1329-1354, November.
    8. Chernozhukov, Victor & Hansen, Christian, 2008. "Instrumental variable quantile regression: A robust inference approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 379-398, January.
    9. Chernozhukov, Victor & Hansen, Christian, 2006. "Instrumental quantile regression inference for structural and treatment effect models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 491-525, June.
    10. David Doloreux & Steve Dionne, 2008. "Is regional innovation system development possible in peripheral regions? Some evidence from the case of La Pocatière, Canada," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 259-283, May.
    11. Youngjin Woo & Euijune Kim & Jaewon Lim, 2017. "The Impact of Education and R&D Investment on Regional Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Franses, Philip Hans, 2008. "Merging models and experts," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 31-33.
    13. Harding, Matthew & Lamarche, Carlos, 2009. "A quantile regression approach for estimating panel data models using instrumental variables," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 133-135, September.
    14. Li, Xiaoying & Wang, Jue & Liu, Xiaming, 2013. "Can locally-recruited R&D personnel significantly contribute to multinational subsidiary innovation in an emerging economy?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 639-651.
    15. Emine Nur Gunay & Gozde Nur Kazazoglu, 2016. "National Innovation Efficiency During the Global Crisis," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-58255-3.
    16. Shansong Huang & Yang Bai & Qingmei Tan, 2017. "How Does the Concentration of Determinants Affect Industrial Innovation Performance? – An Empirical Analysis of 23 Chinese Industrial Sectors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    17. Dirk Fornahl & Christian Zellner & David B. Audretsch (ed.), 2005. "The Role of Labour Mobility and Informal Networks for Knowledge Transfer," International Studies in Entrepreneurship, Springer, number 978-0-387-23140-2, December.
    18. John Whalley & Xiliang Zhao, 2010. "The Contribution of Human Capital to China's Economic Growth," NBER Working Papers 16592, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Liu, Xiaohui & Buck, Trevor, 2007. "Innovation performance and channels for international technology spillovers: Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 355-366, April.
    20. Victor Chernozhukov & Christian Hansen, 2005. "An IV Model of Quantile Treatment Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 245-261, January.
    21. Carr, Stuart C. & Inkson, Kerr & Thorn, Kaye, 2005. "From global careers to talent flow: Reinterpreting 'brain drain'," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 386-398, November.
    22. Gao, Wenlian & Chou, Julia, 2015. "Innovation efficiency, global diversification, and firm value," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 278-298.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiaoping Yang & Shujun Wang & Shan Sun & Jianhua Zhu, 2022. "Influence Mechanism of High-Tech Industrial Agglomeration on Green Innovation Performance: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Ahmed Hassanein & Jamal Ali Al-Khasawneh & Hany Elzahar, 2022. "R&D expenditure and managerial ownership: evidence from firms of high-vs-low R&D intensity," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 654-672, January.
    3. Shuya Wang & Xinjia Tian & Hui Wang & Chang Liu & Zhilin Wang & Qiuhua Song, 2023. "Forecasting and Coupled Coordination Analysis of Supply and Demand for Sustainable Talent in Chinese Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Desheng Yan & Guangming Li, 2023. "A Heterogeneity Study on the Effect of Digital Education Technology on the Sustainability of Cognitive Ability for Middle School Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Runyuan Wang & Weiguang Cai & Hong Ren & Xianrui Ma, 2023. "Heterogeneous Effects of the Talent Competition on Urban Innovation in China: Evidence from Prefecture-Level Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Ming-liang Yue & Rui-nan Li & Gui-yan Ou & Xia Wu & Ting-can Ma, 2020. "An exploration on the flow of leading research talents in China: from the perspective of distinguished young scholars," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1559-1574, November.
    7. Mingfeng Tang & Peng Xu & Patrick Llerena & Asghar Afshar Jahanshahi, 2019. "The Impact of the Openness of Firms’ External Search Strategies on Exploratory Innovation and Exploitative Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Chung-Chu Chuang & Chung-Min Tsai & Hsiao-Chen Chang & Yi-Hsien Wang, 2021. "Applying Quantile Regression to Assess the Relationship between R&D, Technology Import and Patent Performance in Taiwan," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Manuel Pastor & Jose M. Pavía & Lorenzo Serrano & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2017. "Rich regions, poor regions and bank branch deregulation in Spain," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(11), pages 1678-1694, November.
    2. Arribas, Iván & Peiró-Palomino, Jesús & Tortosa-Ausina, Emili, 2020. "Is full banking integration desirable?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Harding, Matthew & Lamarche, Carlos, 2014. "Estimating and testing a quantile regression model with interactive effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 178(P1), pages 101-113.
    4. Li Tao & Yuanjie Zhang & Maozai Tian, 2019. "Quantile Regression for Dynamic Panel Data Using Hausman–Taylor Instrumental Variables," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 1033-1069, March.
    5. Su, Liangjun & Hoshino, Tadao, 2016. "Sieve instrumental variable quantile regression estimation of functional coefficient models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 191(1), pages 231-254.
    6. Philip Kostov & Julie Le Gallo, 2018. "What role for human capital in the growth process: new evidence from endogenous latent factor panel quantile regressions," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 65(5), pages 501-527, November.
    7. Panagiotidis, Theodore & Printzis, Panagiotis, 2021. "Investment and uncertainty: Are large firms different from small ones?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 302-317.
    8. Denis Chetverikov & Bradley Larsen & Christopher Palmer, 2016. "IV Quantile Regression for Group‐Level Treatments, With an Application to the Distributional Effects of Trade," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84, pages 809-833, March.
    9. David Powell & Joachim Wagner, 2021. "The Exporter Productivity Premium Along the Productivity Distribution: Evidence from Quantile Regression with Nonadditive Firm Fixed Effects," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Joachim Wagner (ed.), MICROECONOMETRIC STUDIES OF FIRMS’ IMPORTS AND EXPORTS Advanced Methods of Analysis and Evidence from German Enterprises, chapter 9, pages 121-149, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    10. Philip Kostov & Julie Le Gallo, 2015. "Convergence: A Story of Quantiles and Spillovers," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(4), pages 552-576, November.
    11. Chang, Huibin & Indra, Debarshi & Maiti, Abhradeep, 2023. "Metropolitan area heterogeneity and the impact of road infrastructure improvements on VMT," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    12. Galina Besstremyannaya, 2014. "The efficiency of labor matching and remuneration reforms: a panel data quantile regression approach with endogenous treatment variables," Working Papers w0206, New Economic School (NES).
    13. Li Tao & Lingnan Tai & Manling Qian & Maozai Tian, 2023. "A New Instrumental-Type Estimator for Quantile Regression Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-26, August.
    14. Machado, José A.F. & Santos Silva, J.M.C., 2019. "Quantiles via moments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 145-173.
    15. Harding, Matthew & Lamarche, Carlos, 2014. "A Hausman–Taylor instrumental variable approach to the penalized estimation of quantile panel models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 176-179.
    16. Lamarche, Carlos, 2011. "Measuring the incentives to learn in Colombia using new quantile regression approaches," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 278-288, November.
    17. Galina Besstremyannaya, 2015. "Heterogeneous effect of residency matching and prospective payment on labor returns and hospital scale economies," Discussion Papers 15-001, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
    18. Andini, Corrado & Andini, Monica, 2015. "A Note on Unemployment Persistence and Quantile Parameter Heterogeneity," IZA Discussion Papers 8819, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. David Powell, 2010. "Unconditional Quantile Treatment Effects in the Presence of Covariates," Working Papers WR-816, RAND Corporation.
    20. Michel Cândido de Souza & Lízia de Figueiredo & Mauro Sayar Ferreira, 2021. "The asymmetric evolution of economic institutions: evidence from dynamic panel quantile regression with iv and fixed effects," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG 631, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:7:p:1218-:d:104281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.