IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p4086-d1647575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Policy-Based Agricultural Insurance Promote Agricultural Carbon Emission Reduction? Causal Inference Based on Double Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Yuling Dong

    (School of Economics and Management, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)

  • Lili Gu

    (School of Economics and Management, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)

Abstract

Policy-based agricultural insurance plays a pivotal role in promoting agricultural carbon emissions reduction and driving the development of agricultural modernization. This study, based on panel data from 31 Chinese provinces spanning 2003 to 2021, employs the double machine learning method to conduct theoretical and empirical analyses on the carbon emission reduction effects, implementation mechanisms, and regional heterogeneity in policy-oriented agricultural insurance. The empirical findings indicate that the enforcement of policy-based agricultural insurance exerts a considerable influence on curbing agricultural carbon emissions. This conclusion remains robust across a rigorous suite of robustness checks. Under the “scale–structure–technology” logical framework, the carbon emission reduction effects of policy-oriented agricultural insurance operate through three key mechanisms: the scaling-up of agricultural production, the grain-oriented transformation of planting structures, and the advancement of agricultural technologies. Heterogeneity tests reveal that policy-based agricultural insurance exerts significantly stronger carbon mitigation impacts in major grain-producing areas, the Yangtze River Economic Belt, and regions with stringent environmental regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuling Dong & Lili Gu, 2025. "Can Policy-Based Agricultural Insurance Promote Agricultural Carbon Emission Reduction? Causal Inference Based on Double Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4086-:d:1647575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4086/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4086/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dean Karlan & Robert Osei & Isaac Osei-Akoto & Christopher Udry, 2014. "Agricultural Decisions after Relaxing Credit and Risk Constraints," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 129(2), pages 597-652.
    2. Shibin Wen & Yuxiang Hu & Hongman Liu, 2022. "Measurement and Spatial–Temporal Characteristics of Agricultural Carbon Emission in China: An Internal Structural Perspective," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Mert Demirer & Esther Duflo & Christian Hansen & Whitney Newey & James Robins, 2018. "Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 21(1), pages 1-68, February.
    4. Jiaxuan Li & Zhiyuan Peng, 2024. "Impact of Digital Villages on Agricultural Green Growth Based on Empirical Analysis of Chinese Provincial Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-27, November.
    5. Werner Antweiler & Brian R. Copeland & M. Scott Taylor, 2001. "Is Free Trade Good for the Environment?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(4), pages 877-908, September.
    6. Brick, Kerri & Visser, Martine, 2015. "Risk preferences, technology adoption and insurance uptake: A framed experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 383-396.
    7. Carter, Michael R. & Cheng, Lan & Sarris, Alexandros, 2016. "Where and how index insurance can boost the adoption of improved agricultural technologies," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 59-71.
    8. Morgenstern, Richard D. & Pizer, William A. & Shih, Jhih-Shyang, 2002. "Jobs Versus the Environment: An Industry-Level Perspective," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 412-436, May.
    9. Nie, Song & Ji, Qiang, 2024. "Impact of increasing the supply of rural finance on agricultural total factor productivity: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PB).
    10. Wan, Kai & Yu, Xiaolin, 2024. "Optimal governance radius of environmental information disclosure policy: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 618-630.
    11. Vincent H. Smith & Barry K. Goodwin, 1996. "Crop Insurance, Moral Hazard, and Agricultural Chemical Use," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 78(2), pages 428-438.
    12. Jian Li & Lingyan Jiang & Shuhua Zhang, 2024. "How Land Transfer Affects Agricultural Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Shuangqiang Li & Mingyue Li & Jiaojiao Chen & Siyuan Shao & Yu Tian, 2025. "Impacts and Internal Mechanisms of High-Standard Farmland Construction on the Reduction of Agricultural Carbon Emission in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Gunnsteinsson, Snaebjorn, 2020. "Experimental identification of asymmetric information: Evidence on crop insurance in the Philippines," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    15. Jing Cai, 2016. "The Impact of Insurance Provision on Household Production and Financial Decisions," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 44-88, May.
    16. Changyi Jiang & Wang Hao & Jiliang Ma & Huijie Zhang, 2025. "Achieving Sustainability and Carbon Emission Reduction Through Agricultural Socialized Services: Mechanism Testing and Spatial Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    17. Hill, Ruth Vargas & Kumar, Neha & Magnan, Nicholas & Makhija, Simrin & de Nicola, Francesca & Spielman, David J. & Ward, Patrick S., 2019. "Ex ante and ex post effects of hybrid index insurance in Bangladesh," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1-17.
    18. Lei Zhang & Lili Xu & Mingzi Gao & Mingdong Zhou, 2024. "Can Agricultural Credit Promote the Green Transformation of China’s Agriculture?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Ziming Bai & Tianyi Wang & Jiabin Xu & Cuixia Li, 2023. "Can Agricultural Productive Services Inhibit Carbon Emissions? Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, June.
    20. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Han, J.Y., 2010. "Total factor carbon emission performance: A Malmquist index analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 194-201, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Williams Ali & Awudu Abdulai & Renan Goetz & Victor Owusu, 2021. "Risk, ambiguity and willingness to participate in crop insurance programs: Evidence from a field experiment," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(3), pages 679-703, July.
    2. Sarah Janzen & Nicholas Magnan & Conner Mullally & Soye Shin & I. Bailey Palmer & Judith Oduol & Karl Hughes, 2021. "Can Experiential Games and Improved Risk Coverage Raise Demand for Index Insurance? Evidence from Kenya," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(1), pages 338-361, January.
    3. Linwei Wang & Yixin Hu & Rong Kong, 2023. "The Impact of Bancassurance Interaction on the Adoption Behavior of Green Production Technology in Family Farms: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, April.
    4. Mao, Hui & Sun, Zhenkai & Chai, Anyuan & Fang, Lan & Shi, Chaoqian, 2025. "Extreme Weather, agricultural insurance and farmer's climate adaptation technologies adoption in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. repec:ags:aaea22:335431 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Hui Mao & Shaojian Chen & RuiYao Ying & Yong Fu, 2023. "How crop insurance influences agrochemical input use: Evidence from cotton farmers in China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(2), pages 224-244, April.
    7. Michael R. Carter, 2022. "Can digitally‐enabled financial instruments secure an inclusive agricultural transformation?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(6), pages 953-967, November.
    8. Takahashi, Kazushi & Noritomo, Yuma & Ikegami, Munenobu & Jensen, Nathaniel D., 2020. "Understanding pastoralists’ dynamic insurance uptake decisions: Evidence from four-year panel data in Ethiopia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    9. Shukri Ahmed & Craig McIntosh & Alexandros Sarris, 2020. "The Impact of Commercial Rainfall Index Insurance: Experimental Evidence from Ethiopia," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(4), pages 1154-1176, August.
    10. Naranjo, María A. & Pieters, Janneke & Alpízar, Francisco, 2019. "Credit, insurance and farmers’ liability: Evidence from a lab in the field experiment with coffee farmers in Costa Rica," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 12-27.
    11. Alice Bonou & Markus Olapade & Alessandra Garbero & Leonard Wantchekon, 2023. "Evaluation of the Effects of Introducing Risk Management Tools in Agricultural Development: The Case of PADAER Senegal," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, April.
    12. Lichtenberg, Erik & Iglesias, Eva, 2022. "Index insurance and basis risk: A reconsideration," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    13. Immanuel Lampe & Daniel Würtenberger, 2019. "Loss Aversion And The Demand For Index Insurance," Working Papers on Finance 1907, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance.
    14. Ward, Patrick S. & Kumar, Neha & De Nicola, Francesca & Hill, Ruth & Makhija, Simrin & Spielman, David J. & Magnan, Nicholas, 2017. "Insuring Against Drought: Evidence on Agricultural Intensification and Demand for Index Insurance from a Randomized Evaluation in Rural Bangladesh," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258090, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Hill, Ruth Vargas & Kumar, Neha & Magnan, Nicholas & Makhija, Simrin & de Nicola, Francesca & Spielman, David J. & Ward, Patrick S., 2019. "Ex ante and ex post effects of hybrid index insurance in Bangladesh," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1-17.
    16. Boyd, Chris M. & Bellemare, Marc F., 2022. "Why not insure prices? Experimental evidence from Peru," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 580-631.
    17. Wang, Zhenggang & Wu, Zenan & Yuan, Ye, 2024. "We’ve got you covered! The effect of public health insurance on rural entrepreneurship in China," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    18. Wong, Ho Lun & Wei, Xiangdong & Kahsay, Haftom Bayray & Gebreegziabher, Zenebe & Gardebroek, Cornelis & Osgood, Daniel E. & Diro, Rahel, 2020. "Effects of input vouchers and rainfall insurance on agricultural production and household welfare: Experimental evidence from northern Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    19. Ben Brunckhorst & Ruth Hill & Ghazala Mansuri & Trang Nguyen & Miki Doan, 2023. "Climate and Equity," World Bank Publications - Reports 39952, The World Bank Group.
    20. Marianna Battaglia & Selim Gulesci & Andreas Madestam, 2024. "Repayment Flexibility and Risk Taking: Experimental Evidence from Credit Contracts," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(5), pages 2635-2675.
    21. Trisha R. Shrum & William R. Travis, 2022. "Experiments in ranching: Rain‐index insurance and investment in production and drought risk management," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(3), pages 1513-1533, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4086-:d:1647575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.