IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3651-d1637173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the Economic Effects and Benefits of Developing a Natural Gas Power Plant in Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Min-Ki Hyun

    (Department of Energy Policy, Graduate School of Convergence Science, Seoul National University of Science & Technology, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea)

  • Seo-Young Chung

    (Department of Energy Policy, Graduate School of Convergence Science, Seoul National University of Science & Technology, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea)

  • Seung-Hoon Yoo

    (Department of Future Energy Convergence, College of Creativity and Convergence Studies, Seoul National University of Science & Technology, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

A stable electricity supply is a key factor for sustainable development in Vietnam, a rapidly growing developing country with increasing energy consumption. This article delves quantitatively into the economic effects and benefits arising from the construction of a 1.5 GW capacity natural gas-fired power plant (NGPP). Input–output analysis was applied to identifying the economic effects. Specifically, production-inducing effects and value-added creation effects were analyzed separately for the construction and operation of the NGPP. Based on the economic theory, the economic benefits were computed as the sum of the electricity price and consumer surplus resulting from electricity consumption. During the construction period of the NGPP, it is expected to induce USD 2315.60 million of production and USD 414.75 million of value-added for the Vietnamese economy. The production-inducing effects, value-added creation effects, and economic benefits ensuing from the operation of the NGPP in 2030 were estimated to be USD 833.36 million, USD 235.75 million, and USD 1164.33 million, respectively. The cost–benefit analysis revealed a benefit-to-cost ratio of 1.45, which is higher than 1, indicating the economic feasibility of the construction. Therefore, the construction of the NGPP can be implemented with social net benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Min-Ki Hyun & Seo-Young Chung & Seung-Hoon Yoo, 2025. "Measuring the Economic Effects and Benefits of Developing a Natural Gas Power Plant in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3651-:d:1637173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3651/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3651/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eleonora Riva Sanseverino & Hang Le Thi Thuy & Manh-Hai Pham & Maria Luisa Di Silvestre & Ninh Nguyen Quang & Salvatore Favuzza, 2020. "Review of Potential and Actual Penetration of Solar Power in Vietnam," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Carmen Ramos Carvajal & Ana Salomé García-Muñiz & Blanca Moreno Cuartas, 2019. "Assessing Socioeconomic Impacts of Integrating Distributed Energy Resources in Electricity Markets through Input-Output Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Gunther Bensch & Jochen Kluve & Jörg Peters, 2011. "Impacts of rural electrification in Rwanda," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 567-588, December.
    4. Roy, S. & Lam, Y.F. & Hossain, M.U. & Chan, J.C.L., 2022. "Comprehensive evaluation of electricity generation and emission reduction potential in the power sector using renewable alternatives in Vietnam," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Liu, Hong-Tao & Guo, Ju-E & Qian, Dong & Xi, You-Min, 2009. "Comprehensive evaluation of household indirect energy consumption and impacts of alternative energy policies in China by input-output analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 3194-3204, August.
    6. Rocco, Matteo V. & Di Lucchio, Alberto & Colombo, Emanuela, 2017. "Exergy Life Cycle Assessment of electricity production from Waste-to-Energy technology: A Hybrid Input-Output approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 832-844.
    7. Seo-Young Lee & Kyung-Min Bak & Seung-Hoon Yoo, 2024. "Comparison of the Roles of the South Korean and Japanese Electric Power Sectors in Their National Economies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-24, March.
    8. Man, Pham Nhu & Thuy, Truong Dang, 2025. "Balancing affordability and sustainability: Evidence on public perceptions of reasonable electricity bills in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    9. Qu, Shen & Wang, Hongxia & Liang, Sai & Shapiro, Avi M. & Suh, Sanwong & Sheldon, Seth & Zik, Ory & Fang, Hong & Xu, Ming, 2017. "A Quasi-Input-Output model to improve the estimation of emission factors for purchased electricity from interconnected grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 249-259.
    10. Alexander, Donald L. & Kern, William & Neill, Jon, 2000. "Valuing the Consumption Benefits from Professional Sports Franchises," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 321-337, September.
    11. Meng, F.Y. & Zhou, D.Q. & Zhou, P. & Bai, Y., 2014. "Sectoral comparison of electricity-saving potentials in China: An analysis based on provincial input–output tables," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 772-782.
    12. López-González, A. & Ferrer-Martí, L. & Domenech, B., 2019. "Sustainable rural electrification planning in developing countries: A proposal for electrification of isolated communities of Venezuela," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 327-338.
    13. Duarte, Rosa & Langarita, Raquel & Sánchez-Chóliz, Julio, 2017. "The electricity industry in Spain: A structural analysis using a disaggregated input-output model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2640-2651.
    14. Luong Vinh Quoc Duy & Damien Cassells & Jim Hanly, 2023. "Household electricity consumption: A study on the role of micro-renewable energy systems in Vietnam," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 2261307-226, October.
    15. Lam Do & Thai-Ha Le, 2023. "On the welfare effect of retail electricity subsidy in Vietnam," Journal of Economics and Development, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(4), pages 286-301, August.
    16. C. Oliveira Henriques & S. Sousa, 2023. "A Review on Economic Input-Output Analysis in the Environmental Assessment of Electricity Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-26, March.
    17. Yoo, Seung-Hoon & Lee, Joo-Suk, 2010. "Electricity consumption and economic growth: A cross-country analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 622-625, January.
    18. Yoo, S.-H., 2006. "The causal relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth in the ASEAN countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(18), pages 3573-3582, December.
    19. Rohan Best & Paul J. Burke, 2017. "The Importance of Government Effectiveness for Transitions toward Greater Electrification in Developing Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Hien, P.D., 2019. "Excessive electricity intensity of Vietnam: Evidence from a comparative study of Asia-Pacific countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 409-417.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dakpogan, Arnaud & Smit, Eon, 2018. "The effect of electricity losses on GDP in Benin," MPRA Paper 89545, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Mardones, Cristian & Baeza, Nicolas, 2018. "Economic and environmental effects of a CO2 tax in Latin American countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 262-273.
    3. Muhammad Shahbaz & Mete Feridun, 2012. "Electricity consumption and economic growth empirical evidence from Pakistan," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1583-1599, August.
    4. Dong, Xiao-Ying & Hao, Yu, 2018. "Would income inequality affect electricity consumption? Evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 215-227.
    5. Kumar, Ronald Ravinesh & Stauvermann, Peter Josef & Patel, Arvind & Kumar, Nikeel, 2017. "The effect of energy on output per worker in the Balkan Peninsula: A country-specific study of 12 nations in the Energy Community," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1223-1239.
    6. Hyo-Jin Kim & Gyeong-Sam Kim & Seung-Hoon Yoo, 2019. "Demand Function for Industrial Electricity: Evidence from South Korean Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-11, September.
    7. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Lean, Hooi Hooi, 2012. "The dynamics of electricity consumption and economic growth: A revisit study of their causality in Pakistan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 146-153.
    8. Gurgul, Henryk & Lach, Łukasz, 2012. "The electricity consumption versus economic growth of the Polish economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 500-510.
    9. Syed Ali Raza & Syed Tehseen Jawaid & Mohammad Haris Siddiqui, 2016. "Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth in South Asia," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 17(2), pages 200-215, September.
    10. Zhen, Wei & Qin, Quande & Zhong, Zhangqi & Li, Li & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2018. "Uncovering household indirect energy-saving responsibility from a sectoral perspective: An empirical analysis of Guangdong, China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 451-461.
    11. Kyophilavong, Phouphet & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Kim, Byoungki & OH, Jeong-Soo, 2017. "A note on the electricity-growth nexus in Lao PDR," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1251-1260.
    12. Chirwa, Themba G & Odhiambo, Nicholas M., 2018. "Electricity consumption and economic growth: New evidence from twelve countries," Working Papers 23508, University of South Africa, Department of Economics.
    13. Le, Thai-Ha & Han, Phoumin & Le, Ha-Chi & Bui, Manh-Tien, 2023. "Electricity market development in Vietnam: Historical trends and future outlooks," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    14. Anupam Das & Murshed Chowdhury & Syeed Khan, 2012. "The Dynamics of Electricity Consumption and Growth Nexus: Empirical Evidence from Three Developing Regions," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 6(4), pages 445-466, November.
    15. repec:ipg:wpaper:2014-592 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Villanthenkodath, Muhammed Ashiq & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar, 2021. "Does economic growth respond to electricity consumption asymmetrically in Bangladesh? The implication for environmental sustainability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    17. Rohan Best & Paul J. Burke, 2020. "Energy mix persistence and the effect of carbon pricing," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 555-574, July.
    18. Al-mulali, Usama & Fereidouni, Hassan Gholipour & Lee, Janice Y.M., 2014. "Electricity consumption from renewable and non-renewable sources and economic growth: Evidence from Latin American countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 290-298.
    19. Obsa Urgessa Ayana & Jima Degaga, 2022. "Effects of rural electrification on household welfare: a meta-regression analysis," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 69(2), pages 209-261, June.
    20. Apergis, Nicholas & Payne, James E., 2010. "Coal consumption and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1353-1359, March.
    21. Zhang, Haoran & Li, Ruixiong & Cai, Xingrui & Zheng, Chaoyue & Liu, Laibao & Liu, Maodian & Zhang, Qianru & Lin, Huiming & Chen, Long & Wang, Xuejun, 2022. "Do electricity flows hamper regional economic–environmental equity?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3651-:d:1637173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.