IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2699-d1615156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Climate Risk Disclosure on Corporate Green Technology Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Zhong

    (China Academy of Fiscal Science, Beijing 100142, China)

  • Ling Jin

    (China Academy of Fiscal Science, Beijing 100142, China)

Abstract

Amid escalating global climate challenges, the interplay between corporate climate risk disclosure and green technological innovation has become a pivotal scholarly focus in sustainability research. This study empirically examines the impact of climate risk disclosure on corporate green technology innovation and its underlying mechanisms using data from China’s A-share listed companies spanning 2004 to 2022. Key findings reveal that climate risk information disclosure significantly enhances green innovation capabilities through dual pathways: elevating media attention and reducing agency costs. Specifically, media scrutiny exerts external pressure via reputational incentives and public oversight, driving firms to accelerate green technology deployment. Concurrently, reduced agency costs mitigate information asymmetry between shareholders and management, enabling optimized resource allocation for long-term innovation investments. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that this catalytic effect is more pronounced in larger firms and those facing lower financing constraints. The research theoretically and practically elucidates the dual mechanisms through which climate disclosure propels green innovation, providing empirical support for refining corporate sustainability reporting systems and recalibrating regulatory frameworks. Policy recommendations include adopting differentiated climate disclosure standards, strengthening media and investor oversight, and incentivizing green innovation through executive performance metrics to facilitate low-carbon economic transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Zhong & Ling Jin, 2025. "The Impact of Climate Risk Disclosure on Corporate Green Technology Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2699-:d:1615156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2699/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2699/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kirchberger, Martina, 2017. "Natural disasters and labor markets," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 40-58.
    2. Yu, Chin-Hsien & Wu, Xiuqin & Zhang, Dayong & Chen, Shi & Zhao, Jinsong, 2021. "Demand for green finance: Resolving financing constraints on green innovation in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. Lin, Lili, 2019. "Corporate Governance and Liquidity Risk of Starbucks Company," MPRA Paper 97230, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Nov 2019.
    4. Aerts, Walter & Cormier, Denis, 2009. "Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-27, January.
    5. Ferreira, Daniel & Li, Jin & Nikolowa, Radoslawa, 2019. "Corporate Capture of Blockchain Governance," CEPR Discussion Papers 13493, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Minfeng Yu & Yi Si & Gaoliang Tian & Lei Zhang, 2023. "Climate risk and audit fees: An international study," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(5), pages 4989-5025, December.
    7. Jin, Chenfei & Monfort, Abel & Chen, Feng & Xia, Neng & Wu, Bao, 2024. "Institutional investor ESG activism and corporate green innovation against climate change: Exploring differences between digital and non-digital firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    8. Patrick Bolton Patrick & Després Morgan & Pereira da Silva Luiz Awazu & Samama Frédéric & Svartzman Romain, 2020. "“Green Swans”: central banks in the age of climate-related risks [Le « Cygne Vert » : les banques centrales à l’ère des risques climatiques]," Bulletin de la Banque de France, Banque de France, issue 229.
    9. Tao, Miaomiao & Wang, Jianda & Wu, Sihong & Wang, Guanghao, 2024. "Can climate-related information disclosures strengthen green innovation capacity? Firm-level evidence using textual analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    10. Chung, Huimin & Judge, William Q. & Li, Yi-Hua, 2015. "Voluntary disclosure, excess executive compensation, and firm value," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 64-90.
    11. Watts, Ross L & Zimmerman, Jerold L, 1983. "Agency Problems, Auditing, and the Theory of the Firm: Some Evidence," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(3), pages 613-633, October.
    12. Jie, Guo & Jiahui, Lv, 2023. "Media attention, green technology innovation and industrial enterprises’ sustainable development: The moderating effect of environmental regulation," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 873-889.
    13. Shi, Beibei & Feng, Chen & Qiu, Meng & Ekeland, Anders, 2018. "Innovation suppression and migration effect: The unintentional consequences of environmental regulation," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-23.
    14. Zhang, Si Ying, 2022. "Are investors sensitive to climate-related transition and physical risks? Evidence from global stock markets," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    15. Khaled Alsaifi & Marwa Elnahass & Aly Salama, 2020. "Carbon disclosure and financial performance: UK environmental policy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 711-726, February.
    16. Campa, Pamela, 2018. "Press and leaks: Do newspapers reduce toxic emissions?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 184-202.
    17. Tricker, Bob & Li, Gregg, 2019. "Understanding Corporate Governance in China," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9789888455713, January.
    18. Henry He Huang & Joseph Kerstein & Chong Wang & Feng (Harry) Wu, 2022. "Firm climate risk, risk management, and bank loan financing," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(13), pages 2849-2880, December.
    19. Jayasuriya Mahapatabendige Ruwani Fernando & Leon Li & Yang (Greg) Hou, 2019. "Corporate governance and default prediction: a reality test," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(24), pages 2669-2686, May.
    20. Henry, Darren, 2010. "Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance compliance: A private contracting perspective," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 24-46, January.
    21. Kini, Omesh & Williams, Ryan, 2012. "Tournament incentives, firm risk, and corporate policies," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 350-376.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md Lutfur Rahman & Sudipta Bose, 2025. "Firm-level Climate Vulnerability and Corporate Risk-taking: International Evidence," Working Papers DP-2024-36, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    2. Hyeon-Jae Kim & Oh-Suk Yang, 2025. "Linking ESG Management to Corporate Success: The Influence of Board Composition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Muhammad Kaleem Khan & Chunhui Huo & R. M. Ammar Zahid & Umer Sahil Maqsood, 2024. "The automated sustainability auditor: Does artificial intelligence curtail greenwashing behavior in Chinese firms?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 9015-9039, December.
    4. Nyakumwa, Blessing & Wadesango, Newman & Sitsha, Lovemore, 2023. "The Impact of Internal Audit Function on Corporate Governance: A Case of NSSA, Zimbabwe (2018-2022)," Journal of Economic and Social Development, Clinical Journals Press, vol. 10(02), pages 01-09, September.
    5. repec:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:14:p:28-46 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Waqas Haider & Fayaz Hussain Tunio & Muhammad Usman Arshad & Paulo Jorge Silveira Ferreira, 2025. "Nexus Between Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Risk Mitigation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-32, February.
    7. Wadesango, Newman & Nyakumwa, Blessing & Sitsha, Lovemore, 2023. "Literature Review of the influence of Internal Audit Function on Corporate Governance," Journal of Economic and Social Development, Clinical Journals Press, vol. 10(02), pages 01-12, September.
    8. Hyunah Lee, 2025. "Does ESG Performance Drive Firm-Level Innovation? Evidence from South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-23, February.
    9. Richard Arhinful & Leviticus Mensah & Jerry Seth Owusu-Sarfo, 2024. "The impact of corporate governance on debt service obligations: evidence from automobile companies listed on the Tokyo stock exchange," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 501-519, December.
    10. Emmanuel Anyigbah & Yusheng Kong & Bless Kofi Edziah & Ahotovi Thomas Ahoto & Wilhelmina Seyome Ahiaku, 2023. "Board Characteristics and Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    11. Archana Saxena & Rajesh Singh & Anita Gehlot & Shaik Vaseem Akram & Bhekisipho Twala & Aman Singh & Elisabeth Caro Montero & Neeraj Priyadarshi, 2022. "Technologies Empowered Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): An Industry 4.0 Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Li Mingqian, 2024. "Why Transaction Cost Economics Failed and How to Fix It," Papers 2405.09087, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    13. Angelo de Sousa Santarlacci & Humberto Angelo & Álvaro Nogueira de Souza & Maria de Fátima de Brito Lima & Maísa Santos Joaquim & Eder Pereira Miguel & Júlia de Oliveira Carneiro, 2024. "Benefit Sharing Governance Framework: Pathways for Financial Benefit Sharing in Traditional Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-24, March.
    14. Sonia Yasin & Muhammad Irfan & Muhammad Shaukat Malik & Fasiha Nargis, 2022. "The Relationship between Executive Remuneration and Organizations Efficiency," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(3), pages 59-70, December.
    15. Yuanyuan Wang & Jijie Ma & Kun Zhang, 2024. "Can digital transformation reduce corporate illegality?," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 1090-1109, July.
    16. Thong, Lik Hong, 2019. "A discussion on performance risk of Dunkin's Brand," MPRA Paper 97266, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 30 Nov 2019.
    17. Fahad Asghar & Palwasha Farooq & Muhammad Nadim & Zain ul Abidin & Fazli Wadood, 2023. "Global Financial Crisis: A critical study on Role of Auditor’s and Stakeholder," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(2), pages 452-458.
    18. Olfa Ben Salah, 2024. "Analyzing the Causal Relationship Between Tax Avoidance and Earnings Management: Evidence from The STOXX Europe 600 Index," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 23(1), pages 29-49, January.
    19. Quang Linh Huynh & Mohammad Enamul Hoque & Perengki Susanto & Waqas Ahmad Watto & Maryam Ashraf, 2022. "Does Financial Leverage Mediates Corporate Governance and Firm Performance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Dongshu Jiang & ZhiXing Ni & Yuxiu Chen & Xue Chen & Chaohong Na, 2022. "Influence of Financial Shared Services on the Corporate Debt Cost under Digitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    21. John E.H.J. FoEh & Diah Ayu Permatasari & Jhonni Sinaga, 2022. "Corporate Governance in Need of Reforms: What Areas of the System Should Be Reformed First and How?," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 73-81.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2699-:d:1615156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.