IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5942-d1689393.html

The Impact of ESG Ratings on Corporate Sustainability: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Qi Gong

    (International Business Strategy Institute, University of International Business Economics, Beijing 100084, China
    These authors have contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jiahui Gu

    (International Business Strategy Institute, University of International Business Economics, Beijing 100084, China
    These authors have contributed equally to this work.)

  • Zhaoyang Kong

    (Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Siyan Shen

    (Research Institute for Global Value Chains, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Xiucheng Dong

    (School of International Trade and Economics, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Yang Li

    (International Business Strategy Institute, University of International Business Economics, Beijing 100084, China
    China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation, Beijing 100728, China)

  • Chade Li

    (PowerChina Beijing Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 100024, China)

Abstract

As participants in sustainable development, corporations face the important and controversial issue of whether they can promote corporate sustainability through environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices. To address this issue, we examine the relationship between ESG performance and corporate sustainability, measured by green total factor productivity (GTFP). Using a panel dataset of 17,559 firm-year observations from non-financial firms listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges in China between 2011 and 2019, we employ fixed-effects regression models and two-stage least squares (2SLS) with instrumental variables to empirically test the impact of ESG ratings on GTFP, identify the underlying mechanisms, and examine potential heterogeneity across firms. The results show that higher ESG ratings are significantly associated with increased GTFP. Mediation analysis further reveals that this positive relationship operates through reduced financing constraints and enhanced green innovation. Notably, the mediating role of financing constraints is more pronounced for firms with greater reliance on external capital. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that ESG ratings exert stronger effects in eastern regions, pollution-intensive sectors, and state-owned enterprises. These findings provide empirical support for the role of ESG performance as an effective mechanism to advance corporate sustainability through ethics-driven financial access and innovation capability.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi Gong & Jiahui Gu & Zhaoyang Kong & Siyan Shen & Xiucheng Dong & Yang Li & Chade Li, 2025. "The Impact of ESG Ratings on Corporate Sustainability: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-25, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5942-:d:1689393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5942/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5942/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ester Clementino & Richard Perkins, 2021. "How Do Companies Respond to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 379-397, June.
    2. Tamim Elbasha & Emma Avetisyan, 2018. "A framework to study strategizing activities at the field level: The example of CSR rating agencies," Post-Print hal-01738328, HAL.
    3. Lin, Lili, 2019. "Corporate Governance and Liquidity Risk of Starbucks Company," MPRA Paper 97230, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Nov 2019.
    4. Wenqin Li & John Ziyang Zhang & Rong Ding, 2023. "Impact of Directors’ Network on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 551-583, March.
    5. Hezun Li & Timurs Uman & Siri Terjesen, 2019. "Corporate governance and innovation," Chapters, in: David B. Audretsch & Erik E. Lehmann & Albert N. Link (ed.), A Research Agenda for Entrepreneurship and Innovation, chapter 9, pages 134-154, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Fatemi, Ali & Fooladi, Iraj & Tehranian, Hassan, 2015. "Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 182-192.
    7. Stefan Ambec & Mark A. Cohen & Stewart Elgie & Paul Lanoie, 2013. "The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 7(1), pages 2-22, January.
    8. Yu Zhang & Chiping Chen & Xizheng Zhang, 2024. "The Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance on the Total Factor Productivity of Textile Firms: A Meditating-Moderating Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Lin, Yongjia & Fu, Xiaoqing & Fu, Xiaolan, 2021. "Varieties in state capitalism and corporate innovation: Evidence from an emerging economy," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    10. Amal Aouadi & Sylvain Marsat, 2018. "Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data," Post-Print halshs-02007374, HAL.
    11. Ferreira, Daniel & Li, Jin & Nikolowa, Radoslawa, 2019. "Corporate Capture of Blockchain Governance," CEPR Discussion Papers 13493, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    12. Ziqi Ye & Yujia Liu & Ying Rong, 2024. "How Environmental Regulations Affect Green Total Factor Productivity—Evidence from Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Adam B. Jaffe & Karen Palmer, 1997. "Environmental Regulation And Innovation: A Panel Data Study," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 79(4), pages 610-619, November.
    14. Amal Aouadi & Sylvain Marsat, 2018. "Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 1027-1047, September.
    15. Zhao, Xin & Nakonieczny, Joanna & Jabeen, Fauzia & Shahzad, Umer & Jia, Wenxing, 2022. "Does green innovation induce green total factor productivity? Novel findings from Chinese city level data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    16. Ting Li & Xinlei Zhao & Aiwu Zhao, 2019. "Voting with hands, earnings management and corporate governance," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 178-197, May.
    17. Beat Reber & Agnes Gold & Stefan Gold, 2022. "ESG Disclosure and Idiosyncratic Risk in Initial Public Offerings," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 867-886, September.
    18. Rob Tulder & Nienke Keen, 2018. "Capturing Collaborative Challenges: Designing Complexity-Sensitive Theories of Change for Cross-Sector Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 315-332, June.
    19. Hsu, Po-Hsuan & Tian, Xuan & Xu, Yan, 2014. "Financial development and innovation: Cross-country evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 116-135.
    20. El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane & Kwok, Chuck C.Y. & Mishra, Dev R., 2011. "Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 2388-2406, September.
    21. Abdur Rouf & M. Akhtaruddin, 2019. "Corporate governance reporting in Bangladesh," International Journal of Ethics and Systems, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(1), pages 42-57, October.
    22. Iftekhar Hasan & Nada Kobeissi & Liuling Liu & Haizhi Wang, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance: The Mediating Role of Productivity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 671-688, May.
    23. Mohamed Arouri & Guillaume Pijourlet, 2017. "CSR Performance and the Value of Cash Holdings: International Evidence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 263-284, January.
    24. Xiaoli Hao & Xinhui Wang & Haitao Wu & Yu Hao, 2023. "Path to sustainable development: Does digital economy matter in manufacturing green total factor productivity?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 360-378, February.
    25. Elbasha, Tamim & Avetisyan, Emma, 2018. "A framework to study strategizing activities at the field level: The example of CSR rating agencies," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 38-46.
    26. Simon, Françoise & Tossan, Vesselina, 2018. "Does brand-consumer social sharing matter? A relational framework of customer engagement to brand-hosted social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 175-184.
    27. Tone, Kaoru, 2002. "A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 32-41, November.
    28. Philipp Krueger & Zacharias Sautner & Dragon Yongjun Tang & Rui Zhong, 2021. "The Effects of Mandatory ESG Disclosure Around the World," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 21-44, Swiss Finance Institute.
    29. Françoise Simon & Vesselina Tossan, 2018. "Does brand-consumer social sharing matter? A relational framework of customer engagement to brand-hosted social media," Post-Print hal-01867273, HAL.
    30. Xiaofeng Quan & Yun Ke & Yuting Qian & Yao Zhang, 2023. "CEO Foreign Experience and Green Innovation: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(2), pages 535-557, January.
    31. Huijun Li & Jianhua Zhang & Edward Osei & Mark Yu, 2018. "Sustainable Development of China’s Industrial Economy: An Empirical Study of the Period 2001–2011," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    32. Haoming Ding & Wei Han & Zerui Wang, 2024. "Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) and Total Factor Productivity: The Mediating Role of Financing Constraints and R&D Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-14, October.
    33. Yuanyu Cao & Tao Xu, 2024. "The Impact of Environmental Social Responsibility on Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from Listed Companies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-26, September.
    34. Jaroslav Belas & Adam P. Balcerzak & Jan Dvorsky & Justas Streimikis, 2024. "Influencing ESG Perception in SMEs through CSR, Business Ethics, and HRM: An Empirical Study in V4 Countries," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(66), pages 532-532, Aprilie.
    35. Ting Li & Xinlei Zhao & Aiwu Zhao, 2019. "Voting with hands, earnings management and corporate governance," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 178-197, May.
    36. Zhongju Liao & Chen Weng & Chen Shen, 2020. "Can public surveillance promote corporate environmental innovation? The mediating role of environmental law enforcement," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1519-1527, November.
    37. Tricker, Bob & Li, Gregg, 2019. "Understanding Corporate Governance in China," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9789888455713, August.
    38. repec:eme:ijoes0:ijoes-02-2019-0035 is not listed on IDEAS
    39. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    40. Chen, Hong-Yi & Yang, Sharon S., 2020. "Do Investors exaggerate corporate ESG information? Evidence of the ESG momentum effect in the Taiwanese market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    41. Jayasuriya Mahapatabendige Ruwani Fernando & Leon Li & Yang (Greg) Hou, 2019. "Corporate governance and default prediction: a reality test," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(24), pages 2669-2686, May.
    42. Yu Yan & Xinman Cheng & Tricia Ong, 2024. "Unravelling the Missing Link: Climate Risk, ESG Performance and Debt Capital Cost in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-16, August.
    43. Lei, Ni & Miao, Qin & Yao, Xin, 2023. "Does the implementation of green credit policy improve the ESG performance of enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    44. Yuxiao Gu & Shihong Zeng & Qiao Peng, 2025. "The Mutual Relationships Between ESG, Total Factor Productivity (TFP), and Energy Efficiency (EE) for Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-42, March.
    45. Qingyan Zhu, 2023. "How Will the Relationship between Technological Innovation and Green Total Factor Productivity Change under the Influence of Service-Oriented Upgrading of Industrial Structure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    46. Brunnermeier, Smita B. & Cohen, Mark A., 2003. "Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 278-293, March.
    47. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jia Liu & Jingyao Li & Shuwei Wang, 2025. "Do Executives with IT Backgrounds Influence the Selection of Corporate Auditors in the Context of Digital Innovation?—An Examination from a Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Alina Elena Ionașcu & Dereje Fedasa Hordofa & Alexandra Dănilă & Elena Cerasela Spătariu & Andreea Larisa Burcă (Olteanu) & Maria Gabriela Horga, 2025. "ESG Performance in the EU and ASEAN: The Roles of Institutional Governance, Economic Structure, and Global Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-29, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Jiang & Xin Wang & Liping Liang & Mingming Leng & Xin Fang, 2025. "ESG Ratings as a Strategic Imperative: Unraveling Their Influence on Corporate Financial Performance in China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 9313-9337, June.
    2. Yan Zhao & Yubin Gao & Diming Hong, 2025. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Sustainable Innovation and Economic Resilience: Deciphering ESG Ratings’ Role in Lowering Debt Financing Costs," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 4309-4343, March.
    3. Mutee Ur Rahman & Faisal Abbas, 2025. "Exploring bank diversification and performance: evidence from South Asia," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Rohan Kumar Mishra & Frank Obenpong Kwabi & Abhijeet Chandra, 2025. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Related Party Transaction and Earnings Management: Evidence from India," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 201(2), pages 331-369, October.
    5. Meryem Ayad & Said El Mezouari, 2022. "Research on the implication of artificial intelligence in accounting subfields: current research trends from bibliometric analysis, and research directions," Post-Print hal-05138659, HAL.
    6. Sameer Al Johani & Adnan Atm, 2022. "Revisiting the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Firm performance: Evidence from British Manufacturing Firms," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics, vol. 25(1), pages 7-32.
    7. Ilaria Galavotti & Carlotta D’Este & Daniele Cerrato, 2026. "A size-based contingency approach to family firms’ performance: the role of family power," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 30(1), pages 155-190, March.
    8. Collins Kwaning Owusu & Kwaku Opoku Ababio & Ernest Christian Winful & Evelyn Boadiwaa Bosomtwi, 2024. "Examining the role of financial characteristics of micro and small enterprises in accessing debt financing: evidence from Ghana," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 13(7), pages 343-353, October.
    9. Manpreet Kaur Makkar & Basit Ali Bhat & Mohsin Showkat & Fatma Mabrouk, 2025. "The ESG Paradox: Risk, Sustainability, and the Smokescreen Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Ahmad Yuosef Alodat & Yunhong Hao & Haitham Nobanee & Hazem Ali & Marwan Mansour & Hamzeh Al Amosh, 2025. "Board characteristics and cybersecurity disclosure: evidence from the UK," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 4717-4735, December.
    11. Muttanachai Suttipun & Pongsutti Phuensane & Ploypailin Kijkasiwat, 2026. "Co-opted board and carbon emissions in Thailand," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 212-223, March.
    12. Fernanda Cigainski Lisbinski & Heloisa Lee Burnquist, 2024. "Institutions and financial development: Comparative analysis of developed and developing economies," EconomiA, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(2), pages 347-376, May.
    13. Chenhao Gong & Alina Badulescu, 2025. "Management Motivation, Ethical Responsibility or Social Pressure: How Top Managers Improve Green Behaviors Through Behavioral Strategic Control?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-30, April.
    14. Tiantian Cui & Weixian Wei & Jianhua Huangfu, 2025. "Climate Policy Uncertainty and Green Technology Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Archana Saxena & Rajesh Singh & Anita Gehlot & Shaik Vaseem Akram & Bhekisipho Twala & Aman Singh & Elisabeth Caro Montero & Neeraj Priyadarshi, 2022. "Technologies Empowered Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): An Industry 4.0 Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Runhuan Feng & Hong Li & Ming Liu, 2025. "Robo-Advisors Beyond Automation: Principles and Roadmap for AI-Driven Financial Planning," Papers 2509.09922, arXiv.org.
    17. Weining Li & Ningyu Bei & Liebing Cao, 2025. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Investigating the Role of Non-family CEOs in Knowledge Diffusion and Investment Behavior in Family Firms During Succession," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 1860-1886, March.
    18. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:10040-10062 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Adriano Bellinvia & Paola Brighi & Valeria Venturelli, 2026. "Banks and climate risk: a bibliometric review and policy perspective," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 1-29, June.
    20. Ahmad Yuosef Alodat & Yunhong Hao, 2025. "Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and firm performance: Moderating role of board gender diversity and sustainability committee," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 636-651, February.
    21. Andreea-Roxana Danci & Ionuț-Adrian Lazar & Gabriela-Mihaela Mureșan, 2025. "Financial analysis in the era of uncertainty: a comprehensive examination," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 971-995, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5942-:d:1689393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.