IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7539-d1729084.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ESG Paradox: Risk, Sustainability, and the Smokescreen Effect

Author

Listed:
  • Manpreet Kaur Makkar

    (Apeejay Institute of Management and Engineering Technical Campus, Jalandhar, Punjab 144007, India)

  • Basit Ali Bhat

    (Mittal School of Business, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab 1444111, India)

  • Mohsin Showkat

    (School of Commerce, Presidency University, Rajanakunte, Bangalore 560064, India)

  • Fatma Mabrouk

    (Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Despite numerous global initiatives, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the implementation of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics aimed at mitigating climate change, promoting social welfare, and addressing a variety of other causes, progress has been significantly slower than expected, particularly in developing economies. Thus, we attempted to link corporate ESG to sustainable development. It was also investigated whether ESG contributes to a reduction in corporate risk. Using panel data and the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) technique, we examine the relationship between ESG scores and important financial risk indicators such as systematic risk (beta), stock price volatility, unsystematic risk, and the cost of capital (WACC). The findings show that corporations place a disproportionate emphasis on governance (G) rather than environmental (E) and social (S) characteristics. ESG and G governance were also found to be statistically significant predictors of financial risk. This disparity shows that companies may be using high governance scores to conceal underperformance in environmental and social issues, raising worries about greenwashing and superficial compliance. As a result, their contributions to SDGs such as affordable and clean energy (SDG 7), climate action (SDG 13), and reduced inequalities (SDG 10) are minimal. The findings highlight the need for a more open, balanced, and integrated ESG approach, one that not only promotes sustainable development but also improves long-term financial resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Manpreet Kaur Makkar & Basit Ali Bhat & Mohsin Showkat & Fatma Mabrouk, 2025. "The ESG Paradox: Risk, Sustainability, and the Smokescreen Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7539-:d:1729084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7539/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7539/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hezun Li & Timurs Uman & Siri Terjesen, 2019. "Corporate governance and innovation," Chapters, in: David B. Audretsch & Erik E. Lehmann & Albert N. Link (ed.), A Research Agenda for Entrepreneurship and Innovation, chapter 9, pages 134-154, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Sakhr Bani-Khaled & Graça Azevedo & Jonas Oliveira, 2025. "Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors and firm value: A systematic literature review of theories and empirical evidence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 15(1), pages 228-260, June.
    3. Ting Li & Xinlei Zhao & Aiwu Zhao, 2019. "Voting with hands, earnings management and corporate governance," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 178-197, May.
    4. Mark Anthony Camilleri & Ciro Troise & Serena Strazzullo & Stefano Bresciani, 2023. "Creating shared value through open innovation approaches: Opportunities and challenges for corporate sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4485-4502, November.
    5. Abdur Rouf & M. Akhtaruddin, 2019. "Corporate governance reporting in Bangladesh," International Journal of Ethics and Systems, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(1), pages 42-57, October.
    6. Silvia-Andreea Peliu, 2024. "Exploring the impact of ESG factors on corporate risk: empirical evidence for New York Stock Exchange listed companies," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, December.
    7. Ting Li & Xinlei Zhao & Aiwu Zhao, 2019. "Voting with hands, earnings management and corporate governance," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 178-197, May.
    8. Tricker, Bob & Li, Gregg, 2019. "Understanding Corporate Governance in China," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9789888455713, April.
    9. Daniel Ferreira & Jin Li & Radoslawa Nikolowa, 2019. "Corporate Capture of Blockchain Governance," Working Papers 880, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    10. Lin, Lili, 2019. "Corporate Governance and Liquidity Risk of Starbucks Company," MPRA Paper 97230, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Nov 2019.
    11. Hu, Yi & Jin, Shuchang & Ni, Juan & Peng, Kai & Zhang, Lei, 2023. "Strategic or substantive green innovation: How do non-green firms respond to green credit policy?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    12. Chitra Sriyani De Silva Lokuwaduge & Kumudini Heenetigala, 2017. "Integrating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure for a Sustainable Development: An Australian Study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 438-450, May.
    13. Magdalena Zioło & Iwona Bąk & Anna Spoz, 2023. "Incorporating ESG Risk in Companies’ Business Models: State of Research and Energy Sector Case Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, February.
    14. Rocío Redondo Alamillos & Frédéric de Mariz, 2022. "How Can European Regulation on ESG Impact Business Globally?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Tom Kuhlman & John Farrington, 2010. "What is Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(11), pages 1-13, November.
    16. Luigi Aldieri & Alessandra Amendola & Vincenzo Candila, 2023. "The Impact of ESG Scores on Risk Market Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.
    17. repec:eme:ijoes0:ijoes-02-2019-0035 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Jayasuriya Mahapatabendige Ruwani Fernando & Leon Li & Yang (Greg) Hou, 2019. "Corporate governance and default prediction: a reality test," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(24), pages 2669-2686, May.
    19. Ionica Oncioiu & Anca-Gabriela Petrescu & Florentina-Raluca Bîlcan & Marius Petrescu & Delia-Mioara Popescu & Elena Anghel, 2020. "Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Financial Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qi Gong & Jiahui Gu & Zhaoyang Kong & Siyan Shen & Xiucheng Dong & Yang Li & Chade Li, 2025. "The Impact of ESG Ratings on Corporate Sustainability: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Yan Zhao & Yubin Gao & Diming Hong, 2025. "Sustainable Innovation and Economic Resilience: Deciphering ESG Ratings’ Role in Lowering Debt Financing Costs," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 4309-4343, March.
    3. Mutee Ur Rahman & Faisal Abbas, 2025. "Exploring bank diversification and performance: evidence from South Asia," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Meryem Ayad & Said El Mezouari, 2022. "Research on the implication of artificial intelligence in accounting subfields: current research trends from bibliometric analysis, and research directions," Post-Print hal-05138659, HAL.
    5. Sameer Al Johani & Adnan Atm, 2022. "Revisiting the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Firm performance: Evidence from British Manufacturing Firms," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics, vol. 25(1), pages 7-32.
    6. Wei Jiang & Xin Wang & Liping Liang & Mingming Leng & Xin Fang, 2025. "ESG Ratings as a Strategic Imperative: Unraveling Their Influence on Corporate Financial Performance in China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 9313-9337, June.
    7. Chenhao Gong & Alina Badulescu, 2025. "Management Motivation, Ethical Responsibility or Social Pressure: How Top Managers Improve Green Behaviors Through Behavioral Strategic Control?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-30, April.
    8. Tiantian Cui & Weixian Wei & Jianhua Huangfu, 2025. "Climate Policy Uncertainty and Green Technology Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Runhuan Feng & Hong Li & Ming Liu, 2025. "Robo-Advisors Beyond Automation: Principles and Roadmap for AI-Driven Financial Planning," Papers 2509.09922, arXiv.org.
    10. Weining Li & Ningyu Bei & Liebing Cao, 2025. "Investigating the Role of Non-family CEOs in Knowledge Diffusion and Investment Behavior in Family Firms During Succession," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 1860-1886, March.
    11. Ahmad Yuosef Alodat & Yunhong Hao, 2025. "Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure and firm performance: Moderating role of board gender diversity and sustainability committee," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 636-651, February.
    12. Sami Ben Mim & Aziza Bouzgarrou & Fatma Mabrouk & Jawaher Binsuwadan, 2025. "The Role of Gender Diversity in Preventing Bank Failure: Empirical Evidence from Selected MENA Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-30, October.
    13. Emmanuel Anyigbah & Yusheng Kong & Bless Kofi Edziah & Ahotovi Thomas Ahoto & Wilhelmina Seyome Ahiaku, 2023. "Board Characteristics and Corporate Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    14. Archana Saxena & Rajesh Singh & Anita Gehlot & Shaik Vaseem Akram & Bhekisipho Twala & Aman Singh & Elisabeth Caro Montero & Neeraj Priyadarshi, 2022. "Technologies Empowered Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG): An Industry 4.0 Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Maryam Jameelah Mohd Hashim & Mohd Rahim Khamis, 2025. "Waqf Institutions Sustainability Through Corporate Governance, Marketing, Technology, And Legislation," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 12(6), pages 1083-1098, June.
    16. Dongshu Jiang & ZhiXing Ni & Yuxiu Chen & Xue Chen & Chaohong Na, 2022. "Influence of Financial Shared Services on the Corporate Debt Cost under Digitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Sonia Yasin & Muhammad Irfan & Muhammad Shaukat Malik & Fasiha Nargis, 2022. "The Relationship between Executive Remuneration and Organizations Efficiency," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(3), pages 59-70, December.
    18. Fahad Asghar & Palwasha Farooq & Muhammad Nadim & Zain ul Abidin & Fazli Wadood, 2023. "Global Financial Crisis: A critical study on Role of Auditor’s and Stakeholder," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(2), pages 452-458.
    19. Richard Arhinful & Leviticus Mensah & Halkawt Ismail Mohammed Amin & Hayford Asare Obeng & Bright Akwasi Gyamfi, 2025. "The Strategic Role of Sustainable Finance in Corporate Reputation: A Signaling Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-28, May.
    20. Quang Linh Huynh & Mohammad Enamul Hoque & Perengki Susanto & Waqas Ahmad Watto & Maryam Ashraf, 2022. "Does Financial Leverage Mediates Corporate Governance and Firm Performance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7539-:d:1729084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.