IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7539-d1729084.html

The ESG Paradox: Risk, Sustainability, and the Smokescreen Effect

Author

Listed:
  • Manpreet Kaur Makkar

    (Apeejay Institute of Management and Engineering Technical Campus, Jalandhar, Punjab 144007, India)

  • Basit Ali Bhat

    (Mittal School of Business, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab 1444111, India)

  • Mohsin Showkat

    (School of Commerce, Presidency University, Rajanakunte, Bangalore 560064, India)

  • Fatma Mabrouk

    (Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Despite numerous global initiatives, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the implementation of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics aimed at mitigating climate change, promoting social welfare, and addressing a variety of other causes, progress has been significantly slower than expected, particularly in developing economies. Thus, we attempted to link corporate ESG to sustainable development. It was also investigated whether ESG contributes to a reduction in corporate risk. Using panel data and the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) technique, we examine the relationship between ESG scores and important financial risk indicators such as systematic risk (beta), stock price volatility, unsystematic risk, and the cost of capital (WACC). The findings show that corporations place a disproportionate emphasis on governance (G) rather than environmental (E) and social (S) characteristics. ESG and G governance were also found to be statistically significant predictors of financial risk. This disparity shows that companies may be using high governance scores to conceal underperformance in environmental and social issues, raising worries about greenwashing and superficial compliance. As a result, their contributions to SDGs such as affordable and clean energy (SDG 7), climate action (SDG 13), and reduced inequalities (SDG 10) are minimal. The findings highlight the need for a more open, balanced, and integrated ESG approach, one that not only promotes sustainable development but also improves long-term financial resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Manpreet Kaur Makkar & Basit Ali Bhat & Mohsin Showkat & Fatma Mabrouk, 2025. "The ESG Paradox: Risk, Sustainability, and the Smokescreen Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7539-:d:1729084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7539/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7539/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Yao & Sun, Guangfan & Yan, Xu & Zhang, Yunmeng, 2025. "Interest rate marketization and corporate social responsibility," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    2. Lin, Lili, 2019. "Corporate Governance and Liquidity Risk of Starbucks Company," MPRA Paper 97230, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Nov 2019.
    3. Hezun Li & Timurs Uman & Siri Terjesen, 2019. "Corporate governance and innovation," Chapters, in: David B. Audretsch & Erik E. Lehmann & Albert N. Link (ed.), A Research Agenda for Entrepreneurship and Innovation, chapter 9, pages 134-154, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Hu, Yi & Jin, Shuchang & Ni, Juan & Peng, Kai & Zhang, Lei, 2023. "Strategic or substantive green innovation: How do non-green firms respond to green credit policy?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    5. Sakhr Bani-Khaled & Graça Azevedo & Jonas Oliveira, 2025. "Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors and firm value: A systematic literature review of theories and empirical evidence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 15(1), pages 228-260, June.
    6. Ferreira, Daniel & Li, Jin & Nikolowa, Radoslawa, 2019. "Corporate Capture of Blockchain Governance," CEPR Discussion Papers 13493, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Chitra Sriyani De Silva Lokuwaduge & Kumudini Heenetigala, 2017. "Integrating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure for a Sustainable Development: An Australian Study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 438-450, May.
    8. Ting Li & Xinlei Zhao & Aiwu Zhao, 2019. "Voting with hands, earnings management and corporate governance," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 178-197, May.
    9. Mark Anthony Camilleri & Ciro Troise & Serena Strazzullo & Stefano Bresciani, 2023. "Creating shared value through open innovation approaches: Opportunities and challenges for corporate sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4485-4502, November.
    10. Magdalena Zioło & Iwona Bąk & Anna Spoz, 2023. "Incorporating ESG Risk in Companies’ Business Models: State of Research and Energy Sector Case Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, February.
    11. Abdur Rouf & M. Akhtaruddin, 2019. "Corporate governance reporting in Bangladesh," International Journal of Ethics and Systems, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(1), pages 42-57, October.
    12. Silvia-Andreea Peliu, 2024. "Exploring the impact of ESG factors on corporate risk: empirical evidence for New York Stock Exchange listed companies," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, December.
    13. Rocío Redondo Alamillos & Frédéric de Mariz, 2022. "How Can European Regulation on ESG Impact Business Globally?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Tom Kuhlman & John Farrington, 2010. "What is Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(11), pages 1-13, November.
    15. Luigi Aldieri & Alessandra Amendola & Vincenzo Candila, 2023. "The Impact of ESG Scores on Risk Market Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.
    16. Ting Li & Xinlei Zhao & Aiwu Zhao, 2019. "Voting with hands, earnings management and corporate governance," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(2), pages 178-197, May.
    17. Tricker, Bob & Li, Gregg, 2019. "Understanding Corporate Governance in China," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9789888455713.
    18. repec:eme:ijoes0:ijoes-02-2019-0035 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Jayasuriya Mahapatabendige Ruwani Fernando & Leon Li & Yang (Greg) Hou, 2019. "Corporate governance and default prediction: a reality test," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(24), pages 2669-2686, May.
    20. Ionica Oncioiu & Anca-Gabriela Petrescu & Florentina-Raluca Bîlcan & Marius Petrescu & Delia-Mioara Popescu & Elena Anghel, 2020. "Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Financial Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qi Gong & Jiahui Gu & Zhaoyang Kong & Siyan Shen & Xiucheng Dong & Yang Li & Chade Li, 2025. "The Impact of ESG Ratings on Corporate Sustainability: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Yan Zhao & Yubin Gao & Diming Hong, 2025. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Sustainable Innovation and Economic Resilience: Deciphering ESG Ratings’ Role in Lowering Debt Financing Costs," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 4309-4343, March.
    3. Mutee Ur Rahman & Faisal Abbas, 2025. "Exploring bank diversification and performance: evidence from South Asia," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Collins Kwaning Owusu & Kwaku Opoku Ababio & Ernest Christian Winful & Evelyn Boadiwaa Bosomtwi, 2024. "Examining the role of financial characteristics of micro and small enterprises in accessing debt financing: evidence from Ghana," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 13(7), pages 343-353, October.
    5. Wei Jiang & Xin Wang & Liping Liang & Mingming Leng & Xin Fang, 2025. "ESG Ratings as a Strategic Imperative: Unraveling Their Influence on Corporate Financial Performance in China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 9313-9337, June.
    6. Ahmad Yuosef Alodat & Yunhong Hao & Haitham Nobanee & Hazem Ali & Marwan Mansour & Hamzeh Al Amosh, 2025. "Board characteristics and cybersecurity disclosure: evidence from the UK," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 4717-4735, December.
    7. Muttanachai Suttipun & Pongsutti Phuensane & Ploypailin Kijkasiwat, 2026. "Co-opted board and carbon emissions in Thailand," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(1), pages 212-223, March.
    8. Fernanda Cigainski Lisbinski & Heloisa Lee Burnquist, 2024. "Institutions and financial development: Comparative analysis of developed and developing economies," EconomiA, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(2), pages 347-376, May.
    9. Chenhao Gong & Alina Badulescu, 2025. "Management Motivation, Ethical Responsibility or Social Pressure: How Top Managers Improve Green Behaviors Through Behavioral Strategic Control?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-30, April.
    10. Tiantian Cui & Weixian Wei & Jianhua Huangfu, 2025. "Climate Policy Uncertainty and Green Technology Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Meryem Ayad & Said El Mezouari, 2022. "Research on the implication of artificial intelligence in accounting subfields: current research trends from bibliometric analysis, and research directions," Post-Print hal-05138659, HAL.
    12. Sameer Al Johani & Adnan Atm, 2022. "Revisiting the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Firm performance: Evidence from British Manufacturing Firms," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics, vol. 25(1), pages 7-32.
    13. Ilaria Galavotti & Carlotta D’Este & Daniele Cerrato, 2026. "A size-based contingency approach to family firms’ performance: the role of family power," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 30(1), pages 155-190, March.
    14. Verga Matos, Pedro & Neves, Pedro, 2025. "Wage asymmetries in Portugal: The top executive–worker pay gap and its implications for Sustainable Development Goal 10," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(5).
    15. Runhuan Feng & Hong Li & Ming Liu, 2025. "Robo-Advisors Beyond Automation: Principles and Roadmap for AI-Driven Financial Planning," Papers 2509.09922, arXiv.org.
    16. Rohan Kumar Mishra & Frank Obenpong Kwabi & Abhijeet Chandra, 2025. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Related Party Transaction and Earnings Management: Evidence from India," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 201(2), pages 331-369, October.
    17. Weining Li & Ningyu Bei & Liebing Cao, 2025. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Investigating the Role of Non-family CEOs in Knowledge Diffusion and Investment Behavior in Family Firms During Succession," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 1860-1886, March.
    18. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:10040-10062 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Adriano Bellinvia & Paola Brighi & Valeria Venturelli, 2026. "Banks and climate risk: a bibliometric review and policy perspective," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 1-29, June.
    20. Arnaud Goussebaïle & Alexis Louaas, 2026. "Catastrophe insurance and solvency regulation," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 51(1), pages 66-92, March.
    21. Guanghui Chang & Ishmael Wiredu & Prince Kofi Boadu & Andrew Osei Agyemang, 2026. "Navigating sustainable development: exploring the nexus of board attributes and environmental accounting information disclosure in China’s construction industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 10021-10046, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7539-:d:1729084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.