IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2641-d1613997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Quality of Commercial Relations Between Producers and Buyers in the Fruit and Vegetable Supply Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Roberta Pietrangeli

    (Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forest Systems, University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis Snc, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Clara Cicatiello

    (Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forest Systems, University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis Snc, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Francesca Galli

    (Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy)

  • Anna Carbone

    (Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forest Systems, University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de Lellis Snc, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Luca Cacchiarelli

    (Department of Economics, Engineering, Society and Business Organization, University of Tuscia, Via del Paradiso 47, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Alessandro Sorrentino

    (Department of Economics, Engineering, Society and Business Organization, University of Tuscia, Via del Paradiso 47, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Carlo Russo

    (Department of Economics and Law, University of Cassino and Lazio Meridionale, Via S. Angelo Loc. Folcara, 03043 Cassino, Italy
    European University of Technology, European Union)

Abstract

The different bargaining power of actors is a long-standing problem in the fruit and vegetable supply chain, where buyers (e.g., retailers, industry, and wholesalers) have more power than agricultural producers and are, therefore, able to engage in commercial practices that may be perceived as unfavorable or even unfair by the weaker part. This study explores how producers perceive the quality of commercial relations. The methods include a focus group discussion with sales managers of producer organizations and a survey of agricultural producers in Italy. We measure their willingness to change buyer and their stated overall satisfaction with the commercial relation by analyzing ninety-eight commercial relations and five dimensions of quality in the relationship. We identify four clusters of relationships characterized by different quality levels. The satisfaction and willingness to change buyers significantly differ across the clusters; economically favorable commercial relations are associated with a low willingness to change buyers, even when the producer is not satisfied with the overall quality of the relationship. The highest levels of satisfaction and the lower willingness to change buyers are reached for commercial relations that are not only economically favorable but also include positive relational aspects such as trust and mutual commitment.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberta Pietrangeli & Clara Cicatiello & Francesca Galli & Anna Carbone & Luca Cacchiarelli & Alessandro Sorrentino & Carlo Russo, 2025. "Exploring the Quality of Commercial Relations Between Producers and Buyers in the Fruit and Vegetable Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2641-:d:1613997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2641/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2641/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Russo, Carlo & Di Marcantonio, Federica & Cacchiarelli, Luca & Menapace, Luisa & Sorrentino, Alessandro, 2023. "Unfair trading practices and countervailing power," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    2. Bree Devin & Carol Richards, 2018. "Food Waste, Power, and Corporate Social Responsibility in the Australian Food Supply Chain," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 199-210, June.
    3. Daniele Cavicchioli, 2018. "Detecting Market Power Along Food Supply Chains: Evidence and Methodological Insights from the Fluid Milk Sector in Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Eriksson, Mattias & Ghosh, Ranjan & Mattsson, Lisa & Ismatov, Alisher, 2017. "Take-back agreements in the perspective of food waste generation at the supplier-retailer interface," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 83-93.
    5. Alessandro Bonanno & Carlo Russo & Luisa Menapace, 2018. "Market power and bargaining in agrifood markets: A review of emerging topics and tools," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 6-23, December.
    6. Christy, Ralph D., 1987. "The Role of Farmer Cooperatives in a Changing Agricultural Economy," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 21-28, July.
    7. Daniele Mozzato & Paola Gatto & Edi Defrancesco & Lucia Bortolini & Francesco Pirotti & Elena Pisani & Luigi Sartori, 2018. "The Role of Factors Affecting the Adoption of Environmentally Friendly Farming Practices: Can Geographical Context and Time Explain the Differences Emerging from Literature?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Christy, Ralph D., 1987. "The Role Of Farmer Cooperatives In A Changing Agricultural Economy," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(01), pages 1-8, July.
    9. Maria-Angeles Fernandez-Zamudio & Héctor Barco & Felicitas Schneider, 2020. "Direct Measurement of Mass and Economic Harvest and Post-Harvest Losses in Spanish Persimmon Primary Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Richard J. Sexton & Tian Xia, 2018. "Increasing Concentration in the Agricultural Supply Chain: Implications for Market Power and Sector Performance," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 10(1), pages 229-251, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maximilian Koppenberg & Stefan Hirsch, 2022. "Output market power and firm characteristics in dairy processing: Evidence from three EU countries," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 490-517, June.
    2. Maximilian Koppenberg, 2023. "Markups, organic agriculture and downstream concentration at the example of European dairy farmers," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 54(2), pages 161-178, March.
    3. De Carvalho Reis Neves, Mateus & Freitas, Carlos Otavio & De Figueiredo Silva, Felipe & Braga, Marcelo J. & Costa, Davi M., 2021. "The effect of marketing through cooperatives on income distribution in Brazil," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 314007, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Lukáš Čechura & Tinoush Jamali Jaghdani, 2021. "Market Imperfections within the European Wheat Value Chain: The Case of France and the United Kingdom," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Luca Cattivelli & Federico Antonioli, 2023. "When cointegration is interrupted: Price transmission analysis in the Italian dairy‐feed industry," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 744-761, July.
    6. Murphy, Cecile & Schertz Willett, Lois, 1993. "Cooperative Development and Functions in Specialty Crop Industries," EB Series 186233, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    7. Stefan Hirsch & David Lanter & Robert Finger, 2021. "Profitability and profit persistence in EU food retailing: Differences between top competitors and fringe firms," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(2), pages 235-263, April.
    8. Han, Saim Woo, 1992. "A production and pricing decision model for the Korean agricultural cooperatives," ISU General Staff Papers 1992010108000010995, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    9. Čechura, Lukáš & Jamali Jaghdani, Tinoush, 2021. "Market imperfections within the European wheat value chain: The case of France and the United Kingdom," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(9).
    10. Federica Di Marcantonio & Pavel Ciaian & Jan Fałkowski, 2020. "Contracting and Farmers’ Perception of Unfair Trading Practices in the EU Dairy Sector," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(3), pages 877-903, September.
    11. Zeballos, Eliana & Dong, Xiao & Islamaj, Ergys, "undated". "A Disaggregated View of Market Concentration in the Food Retail Industry," USDA Miscellaneous 333546, United States Department of Agriculture.
    12. Koen Deconinck & Marion Jansen & Carla Barisone, 2023. "Fast and furious: the rise of environmental impact reporting in food systems," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(4), pages 1310-1337.
    13. Hirsch, Stefan & Koppenberg, Maximilian, 2020. "Power imbalances in French food retailing: Evidence from a production function approach to estimate market power," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    14. Michał Gazdecki & Grzegorz Leszczyński & Marek Zieliński, 2021. "Food Sector as an Interactive Business World: A Framework for Research on Innovations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Jeffrey Hadachek & Meilin Ma & Richard J. Sexton, 2024. "Market structure and resilience of food supply chains under extreme events," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(1), pages 21-44, January.
    16. Maria Petrescu & Anjala S. Krishen, 2020. "The importance of high-quality data and analytics during the pandemic," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(2), pages 43-44, June.
    17. Pauline Bergström & Christopher Malefors & Ingrid Strid & Ole Jørgen Hanssen & Mattias Eriksson, 2020. "Sustainability Assessment of Food Redistribution Initiatives in Sweden," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-27, March.
    18. Alejandro Fontana & Antonio Velasquez-Fernandez & Maria Isabel Rodriguez-Vasquez & Grecia Cuervo-Guerrero, 2025. "Territorial Analysis Through the Integration of CFS-RAI Principles and the Working with People Model: An Application in the Andean Highlands of Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-23, February.
    19. Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Dominika Milczarek-Andrzejewska & Jan Fałkowski, 2019. "Farmers’ Bargaining Power and Input Prices: What Can We Learn from Self-Reported Assessments? 1," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13, February.
    20. Michał Gazdecki & Kamila Grześkowiak, 2025. "Does Financial Power Lead Farmers to Focus More on the Behavioral Factors of Business Relationships with Input Suppliers?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-25, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2641-:d:1613997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.