IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9476-d1779088.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Food Consumption and the Attitude–Behavior Gap: Factor Analysis and Recommendations for Marketing Communication

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Szeląg-Sikora

    (Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Faculty of Production and Power Engineering, Power Engineering and Automation, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Balicka 116B, 30-149 Kraków, Poland)

  • Aneta Oleksy-Gębczyk

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences, State of Applied Sciences in Nowy Sącz, ul. Aleje Wolności 38, 33-300 Nowy Sącz, Poland)

  • Paulina Rydwańska

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences, State of Applied Sciences in Nowy Sącz, ul. Aleje Wolności 38, 33-300 Nowy Sącz, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Kowalska-Jarnot

    (Interdisciplinary Faculty, SWPS University in Krakow, ul. al. Jana Pawła II 39 A, 31-864 Kraków, Poland)

  • Anna Kochanek

    (Institute of Engineering, State University of Applied Sciences in Nowy Sącz, ul. Zamenhofa 1A, 33-300 Nowy Sącz, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Generowicz

    (Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Energy, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland
    Interdisciplinary Center for Circular Economy, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

Sustainable protein consumption is a key element in the transition toward more environmentally responsible food systems. Poultry, due to its relatively low carbon footprint and favorable health profile, holds significant potential to become an important component of the so-called “protein transition.” The aim of this article is to identify cognitive factors influencing consumer purchasing decisions regarding poultry and to formulate recommendations for marketing communication strategies that position poultry as a choice aligned with sustainability goals. This study is based on an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) conducted on a nationally representative sample of Polish consumers (AgriFood 2024). The results revealed three dominant decision-making determinants—taste, health, and convenience—collectively forming the original THC (Taste–Health–Convenience) model. This model provides a novel interpretive framework, showing how sustainability issues can be communicated through immediate, personally relevant consumer benefits, and subsequently expanded to include environmental and ethical aspects. The findings indicate that effective communication should emphasize tangible, everyday consumer benefits while also leveraging poultry’s lower climate impact compared to red meat. This article makes an original contribution to the debate on sustainable diets by presenting the THC model both as a tool for explaining the mechanisms of the attitude–behavior gap and as a practical instrument for designing campaigns that support the implementation of SDG 3 and SDG 12.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Aneta Oleksy-Gębczyk & Paulina Rydwańska & Katarzyna Kowalska-Jarnot & Anna Kochanek & Agnieszka Generowicz, 2025. "Sustainable Food Consumption and the Attitude–Behavior Gap: Factor Analysis and Recommendations for Marketing Communication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-26, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9476-:d:1779088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9476/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9476/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Govindan, Kannan, 2018. "Sustainable consumption and production in the food supply chain: A conceptual framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 419-431.
    2. Katarzyna Mazur-Włodarczyk & Agnieszka Gruszecka-Kosowska, 2022. "Sustainable or Not? Insights on the Consumption of Animal Products in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Azlan Amran & Say Keat Ooi & Riduan Toani Mydin & S. Susela Devi, 2015. "The Impact of Business Strategies on Online Sustainability Disclosures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 551-564, September.
    4. Akifumi Ogino & Kazato Oishi & Akira Setoguchi & Takashi Osada, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Sustainable Broiler Production Systems: Effects of Low-Protein Diet and Litter Incineration," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Anna Kochanek & Józef Janczura & Sławomir Jurkowski & Tomasz Zacłona & Anna Gronba-Chyła & Paweł Kwaśnicki, 2025. "The Analysis of Exhaust Composition Serves as the Foundation of Sustainable Road Transport Development in the Context of Meeting Emission Standards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Giancarlo Bozzo & Marialaura Corrente & Giovanni Testa & Gaia Casalino & Michela Maria Dimuccio & Elena Circella & Nazario Brescia & Roberta Barrasso & Francesco Emanuele Celentano, 2021. "Animal Welfare, Health and the Fight against Climate Change: One Solution for Global Objectives," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Józef Ciuła & Agnieszka Generowicz & Aneta Oleksy-Gębczyk & Anna Gronba-Chyła & Iwona Wiewiórska & Paweł Kwaśnicki & Piotr Herbut & Viktor Koval, 2024. "Technical and Economic Aspects of Environmentally Sustainable Investment in Terms of the EU Taxonomy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.
    8. Ruben Sanchez-Sabate & Joan Sabaté, 2019. "Consumer Attitudes Towards Environmental Concerns of Meat Consumption: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-37, April.
    9. Carlo Genova & Veronica Allegretti, 2024. "Sustainable Food Consumption: Social Representations of Definitions, Drivers, and Obstacles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.
    10. António Almeida & Joana Torres & Isilda Rodrigues, 2023. "The Impact of Meat Consumption on Human Health, the Environment and Animal Welfare: Perceptions and Knowledge of Pre-Service Teachers," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Katz-Rosene, Ryan & Heffernan, Andrew & Arora, Anil, 2023. "Protein pluralism and food systems transition: A review of sustainable protein meta-narratives," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    12. Petru Alexandru Vlaicu & Arabela Elena Untea & Alexandra Gabriela Oancea, 2024. "Sustainable Poultry Feeding Strategies for Achieving Zero Hunger and Enhancing Food Quality," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-57, October.
    13. Sara de Sio & Giulia Casu & Alessandra Zamagni & Paola Gremigni, 2024. "Product Characteristics and Emotions to Bridge the Intention-Behavior Gap in Green Food Purchasing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, August.
    14. Alejandro Alvarado-Herrera & Enrique Bigne & Joaquín Aldas-Manzano & Rafael Curras-Perez, 2017. "A Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility Following the Sustainable Development Paradigm," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 243-262, January.
    15. Anna Kochanek & Józef Ciuła & Mariusz Cembruch-Nowakowski & Tomasz Zacłona, 2025. "Polish Farmers′ Perceptions of the Benefits and Risks of Investing in Biogas Plants and the Role of GISs in Site Selection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-29, July.
    16. Monde Rapiya & Mthunzi Mndela & Abel Ramoelo, 2025. "Sustainable Food Systems Through Livestock–Pasture Integration," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Maurizio Cellura & Maria Anna Cusenza & Sonia Longo & Le Quyen Luu & Thomas Skurk, 2022. "Life Cycle Environmental Impacts and Health Effects of Protein-Rich Food as Meat Alternatives: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Kochanek & Józef Ciuła & Mariusz Cembruch-Nowakowski & Tomasz Zacłona, 2025. "Polish Farmers′ Perceptions of the Benefits and Risks of Investing in Biogas Plants and the Role of GISs in Site Selection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-29, July.
    2. Anna Kochanek & Agnieszka Generowicz & Tomasz Zacłona, 2025. "The Role of Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Management and the Development of Renewable Energy Sources—A Review Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-34, September.
    3. Arru Brunella & Delrio Federico & Furesi Roberto & Pulina Pietro & Fabio Albino Madau, 2025. "Role of environmental, social and governance disclosure in business profitability and cost of debt: An analysis of small Southern Italian agri‐food businesses," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 856-895, July.
    4. Karol Dabrowski & Katarzyna Skrzypek & Daria Moskwa - Beczkowska, 2025. "Orders for Sustainability Reports – A New Phenomenon in Manufacturing Companies in the Metal and Automotive Industries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 659-673.
    5. Nuno Aluai Carvalho & Maria da Conceição Martins, 2024. "Education to Promote Healthy and Sustainable Eating Habits: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-14, November.
    6. León-Bravo, Verónica & Caniato, Federico, 2024. "Sustainability performance measurement in the food supply chain: Trade-offs, institutional pressures, and contextual factors," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 633-646.
    7. Luo, Na & Feng, Zhangwei & Liu, Yanping & Wu, Sihong & Liang, Xiaoxiao, 2025. "Tackling food waste: The role of food suppliers’ investment in preservation technology and government intervention," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    8. Najafi, Mehdi & Zolfagharinia, Hossein, 2024. "A Multi-objective integrated approach to address sustainability in a meat supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    9. Brij B. Gupta & Akshat Gaurav & Prabin Kumar Panigrahi, 2023. "Analysis of the development of sustainable entrepreneurship practices through knowledge and smart innovative based education system," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 923-940, June.
    10. Yun-Chan Yen & Shih-Chih Chen, 2025. "The Triple Pathway to Loyalty: Understanding How Banks’ Corporate Social Responsibility Influences Customers via Moral Identity, Service Quality, and Relationship Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-28, April.
    11. Ali Saeed Almuflih & Janpriy Sharma & Mohit Tyagi & Arvind Bhardwaj & Mohamed Rafik Noor Mohamed Qureshi & Nawaf Khan, 2022. "Leveraging the Dynamics of Food Supply Chains towards Avenues of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Miao Su & Su‐Han Woo & Xiaochun Chen & Keun‐sik Park, 2023. "Identifying critical success factors for the agri‐food cold chain's sustainable development: When the strategy system comes into play," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 444-461, January.
    13. Camila Kolling & José Luis Duarte Ribeiro & Donato Morea & Gianpaolo Iazzolino, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and circular economy from the perspective of consumers: A cross‐cultural analysis in the cosmetic industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1226-1243, May.
    14. Youngdeok Lee & Kittichai Watchravesringkan, 2022. "How to Promote Eco-Apparel? Effects of Eco-Labels and Message Framing," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(2), pages 1-69, December.
    15. Pablo Gomez‐Carrasco & Giovanna Michelon, 2017. "The Power of Stakeholders' Voice: The Effects of Social Media Activism on Stock Markets," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 855-872, September.
    16. Juliane Peters & Ana Simaens, 2020. "Integrating Sustainability into Corporate Strategy: A Case Study of the Textile and Clothing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-35, July.
    17. Luo, Na & Olsen, Tava & Liu, Yanping & Zhang, Abraham, 2022. "Reducing food loss and waste in supply chain operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    18. Irma Cristina Espitia Moreno & Betzabé Ruiz Morales & Víctor G. Alfaro-García & Marco A. Miranda-Ackerman, 2024. "Agri-Food Management and Sustainable Practices: A Fuzzy Clustering Application Using the Galois Lattice," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-14, June.
    19. Patrick Klein & Bastian Popp, 2022. "Last-Mile Delivery Methods in E-Commerce: Does Perceived Sustainability Matter for Consumer Acceptance and Usage?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    20. Ewa Halicka & Joanna Kaczorowska & Krystyna Rejman & Agata Szczebyło, 2021. "Parental Food Choices and Engagement in Raising Children’s Awareness of Sustainable Behaviors in Urban Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-18, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9476-:d:1779088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.