IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9022-d1769237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Policy Synergy Improve Ecological Resilience? Evidence from Smart City and Low-Carbon Pilots in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiandong Yang

    (Business School, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China)

  • Kemei Yu

    (Business School, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China)

Abstract

Pilot policies are key determinants of urban ecological resilience, while the corresponding results are inconsistent. Moreover, existing research on the synergistic effects of policies on ecological resilience remains insufficient. Thus, this study selects low-carbon pilot policies and smart city pilot policies to explore the possible channels through which they affect ecological resilience. Consequently, using the sample data of China’s prefecture-level cities during the period of 2005–2022, we employ a multi-period difference-in-differences approach and two-step regression to examine the relationship between dual pilot policies and ecological resilience. We find that dual pilot policies have a significant positive impact on ecological resilience, and the conclusion is still held after a series of robustness tests. We also find that regional and population size heterogeneity effects exist. Furthermore, the sequences of pilots significantly influence ecological resilience, where the sequence of implementing low-carbon pilot programs earlier than smart city pilot programs has a greater impact on ecological resilience. Finally, the dual pilot policies enhance ecological resilience through channels of technological innovation and industrial structure upgrading. Overall, this study reveals the relationship between policies and ecological resilience, providing policy insights for building resilient cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiandong Yang & Kemei Yu, 2025. "Does Policy Synergy Improve Ecological Resilience? Evidence from Smart City and Low-Carbon Pilots in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-14, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9022-:d:1769237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9022/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9022/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9022-:d:1769237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.