IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5735-d1684672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Inclusivity in the Smart City Governance: Overcoming the Digital Divide

Author

Listed:
  • Vitalii Kruhlov

    (Department of Sociology and Public Administration, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, 61002 Kharkiv, Ukraine)

  • Jaroslav Dvorak

    (Department of Public Administration and Political Sciences, Klaipeda University, 92294 Klaipeda, Lithuania)

Abstract

The current research examines the issue of social inclusivity in the context of digitalization of smart city governance and explores ways to overcome the digital divide, which impedes equal access to online services for vulnerable population groups (elderly people, people with disabilities, low-income individuals, and residents of remote areas). Based on a literature review, the study outlines three generations of the digital divide: access, digital skills, and the ability to derive socio-economic benefits. A methodology is proposed that combines cluster analysis of 27 European cities using 11 integrated indicators, aimed at identifying typical development profiles while accounting for infrastructure, air quality, and levels of digital literacy. The results revealed four clusters: “Digital Leaders with Environmental Awareness”, “Mid-Level Cities with Development Potential”, “Opportunities with Environmental Challenges”, and “Advanced Digital Hubs with High Quality of Life”. The study confirms the hypothesis regarding the effectiveness of a comprehensive approach that integrates infrastructure investment, educational programs, and inclusive planning. The article’s conclusions emphasize the need to apply universal design principles, subsidize internet access, and regularly monitor digital inclusion indices to achieve SDGs 11 and 16.

Suggested Citation

  • Vitalii Kruhlov & Jaroslav Dvorak, 2025. "Social Inclusivity in the Smart City Governance: Overcoming the Digital Divide," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5735-:d:1684672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5735/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5735/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Song Yang & Yinfeng Su & Qin Yu, 2024. "Smart-City Policy in China: Opportunities for Innovation and Challenges to Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-32, August.
    2. Åsa Waara, 2025. "Examining Digital Government Maturity Models: Evaluating the Inclusion of Citizens," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Songling Chang & Melanie Kay Smith, 2023. "Residents’ Quality of Life in Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Christidis, Panayotis & Navajas Cawood, Elena & Fiorello, Davide, 2022. "Challenges for urban transport policy after the Covid-19 pandemic: Main findings from a survey in 20 European cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 105-116.
    5. Fanlin Kong & Shaojun Chen & Jie Gou, 2023. "How Does Differential Public Participation Influence Outcome Justice in Energy Transitions? Evidence from a Waste-to-Energy (WTE) Project in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Paolo Cardullo & Rob Kitchin, 2019. "Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of ‘citizen-focused’ smart cities in Europe," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(5), pages 813-830, August.
    7. Tamara Morte-Nadal & Miguel Ángel Esteban-Navarro, 2025. "Recommendations for digital inclusion in the use of European digital public services," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ida Skubis & Radosław Wolniak & Wiesław Wes Grebski, 2024. "AI and Human-Centric Approach in Smart Cities Management: Case Studies from Silesian and Lesser Poland Voivodships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Bipashyee Ghosh & Saurabh Arora, 2022. "Smart as (un)democratic? The making of a smart city imaginary in Kolkata, India," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 318-339, February.
    3. Gusti Ayu Made Suartika & Alexander Cuthbert, 2020. "The Sustainable Imperative—Smart Cities, Technology and Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Solis, Miriam & Bashar, Samira Binte, 2022. "Social equity implications of advanced water metering infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Ibrahim Mutambik, 2024. "Unlocking the Potential of Sustainable Smart Cities: Barriers and Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Jain, Monika & Singh, Archana, 2024. "An empirical study on electric vehicle adoption in India: A step towards a greener environment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 112-125.
    7. Monika Wawer & Kalina Grzesiuk & Dorota Jegorow, 2022. "Smart Mobility in a Smart City in the Context of Generation Z Sustainability, Use of ICT, and Participation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-30, June.
    8. Zsigó, Zsanett, 2023. "Methodologies for Measuring Mobility in Covid-19 Research," Economic and Regional Studies (Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne), John Paul II University of Applied Sciences in Biala Podlaska, vol. 16(2), June.
    9. Cristina Viano & Sowelu Avanzo & Monica Cerutti & Alex Cordero & Claudio Schifanella & Guido Boella, 2022. "Blockchain tools for socio-economic interactions in local communities [Blockchain-based smart contracts: A systematic mapping study]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(3), pages 373-385.
    10. Nimesha Sahani Jayasena & Daniel W. M. Chan & Mohan M. Kumaraswamy, 2022. "Is Public–Private Partnership (PPP) a Preferred Strategy for Procuring Smart Infrastructure in Developed Countries: An Empirical Study of the Perceived Benefits, Barriers and Recommended Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, May.
    11. Cano-Leiva, José & Gomez, Juan & Alves, Guilherme F. & Manuel Vassallo, José, 2024. "How has COVID-19 changed individuals’ e-commerce and shopping mobility habits? Evidence from Madrid Region," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    12. Ryan Burns & Victoria Fast & Anthony Levenda & Byron Miller, 2021. "Smart cities: Between worlding and provincialising," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(3), pages 461-470, February.
    13. Ferreira, António & Oliveira, Fernanda Paula & von Schönfeld, Kim Carlotta, 2022. "Planning cities beyond digital colonization? Insights from the periphery," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    14. Fernando Almeida & Cristina Machado Guimarães & Vasco Amorim, 2024. "Exploring the Differences and Similarities between Smart Cities and Sustainable Cities through an Integrative Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-22, October.
    15. Giovanni Baldi & Antonietta Megaro & Luca Carrubbo, 2022. "Small-Town Citizens’ Technology Acceptance of Smart and Sustainable City Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Xu, Ningzhe & Nie, Qifan & Liu, Jun & Jones, Steven, 2024. "Linking short- and long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on travel behavior and travel preferences in Alabama: A machine learning-supported path analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 46-62.
    17. Hiroshi Ito & Kazuhiko Kato, 2025. "Redefining Toyota’s Woven City as a “glocal” innovation ecosystem for integrated sustainable development," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Kaisu Kuusela & Jenni Partanen, 2022. "Plenty of Planning, Scanty Guidance: Evaluating the Implementation Degree of the General Master Plan in the City of Tampere, Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Jessica Pykett & Benjamin Chrisinger & Kalliopi Kyriakou & Tess Osborne & Bernd Resch & Afroditi Stathi & Eszter Toth & Anna C. Whittaker, 2020. "Developing a Citizen Social Science approach to understand urban stress and promote wellbeing in urban communities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Dianat, Alireza & Nurul Habib, Khandker, 2024. "Understanding the post-pandemic evolution of telecommuting preferences by using a panel stated preference survey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 138-147.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5735-:d:1684672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.