IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04576-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recommendations for digital inclusion in the use of European digital public services

Author

Listed:
  • Tamara Morte-Nadal

    (University of Zaragoza
    Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR))

  • Miguel Ángel Esteban-Navarro

    (University of Zaragoza
    University of Zaragoza)

Abstract

This study examines digital public services within the European Union, focusing on digital inclusion and the barriers preventing widespread e-government adoption. A significant knowledge gap exists in understanding the interaction between citizens and digital public services, particularly for vulnerable groups, and in evaluating the impact of regional and sector-specific factors. The research employs a mixed-methods approach, including a systematic review based on PRISMA methodology, a document analysis of the digital and programs of the European Union and the Member States, 33 semi-structured expert interviews, and a survey targeting Spanish intermediate leaders, to explore digital divides in access, skills, and outcomes. Key findings reveal that barriers such as limited digital skills, access to technology, and inadequate service design disproportionately affect the elderly, low-income populations, and those with minimal education. Eighteen recommendations have been proposed, associated to five indicators of the model proposed to evaluate the key dimensions of e- government adoption and digital inclusion: internet access, digital skills, user interaction, social drivers and barriers, and outcomes. The recommendations include, among others, enhancing digital skills through tailored training programs, involving the third sector, simplifying service interfaces, and promoting a hybrid service model combining digital and face-to-face options. The study also highlights gaps in addressing civic participation as part of e- government, suggesting it as a focus for future research. These findings underscore the need for user-centred, context-specific policies to ensure equitable access to digital public services and reduce digital exclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamara Morte-Nadal & Miguel Ángel Esteban-Navarro, 2025. "Recommendations for digital inclusion in the use of European digital public services," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04576-7
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04576-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04576-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04576-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pérez-Morote, Rosario & Pontones-Rosa, Carolina & Núñez-Chicharro, Montserrat, 2020. "The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Kai-Kit Soong & Elsadig Musa Ahmed & Khong Sin Tan, 2020. "Factors influencing Malaysian small and medium enterprises adoption of electronic government procurement," Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(1), pages 38-61, January.
    3. Yueping Zheng & Hindy Lauer Schachter, 2017. "Explaining Citizens’ E-Participation Use: the Role of Perceived Advantages," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 409-428, September.
    4. Isaac Kofi Mensah, 2019. "Predictors of Electronic Government Services Adoption: The African Students’ Perspective in China," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(12), pages 997-1009, September.
    5. Sohail Raza Chohan & Guangwei Hu, 2022. "Strengthening digital inclusion through e-government: cohesive ICT training programs to intensify digital competency," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 16-38, January.
    6. Dobrolyubova Elena, 2021. "Measuring Outcomes of Digital Transformation in Public Administration: Literature Review and Possible Steps Forward," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 61-86, June.
    7. Willemien Laenens & Wendy Van den Broeck & Ilse Mariën, 2018. "Channel Choice Determinants of (Digital) Government Communication: A Case Study of Spatial Planning in Flanders," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 140-152.
    8. Willemien Laenens & Wendy Van den Broeck & Ilse Mariën, 2018. "Channel Choice Determinants of (Digital) Government Communication: A Case Study of Spatial Planning in Flanders," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 140-152.
    9. Aleksandra Klich, 2021. "Electronic Communication with Public Administration in the Time of COVID-19—Poland’s Experience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Tommi Inkinen & Maria Merisalo & Teemu Makkonen, 2018. "Variations in the adoption and willingness to use e-services in three differentiated urban areas," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(5), pages 950-968, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radtke, Jörg, 2025. "E-participation in energy transitions: What does it mean? Chances and challenges within Germany's Energiewende," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    2. Luís V. Tavares & José A. Ferreira & Ana M. Sá & Ana C. Saraiva & Vasco. B. Moreira & Gonçalo M. Mendes, 2023. "A Multicriteria Evaluation of Local E-Government in Terms of Citizen Satisfaction," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Saeed Nosratabadi & Thabit Atobishi & Szilard HegedHus, 2023. "Social Sustainability of Digital Transformation: Empirical Evidence from EU-27 Countries," Papers 2305.16088, arXiv.org.
    4. Ueno, Akiko & Dennis, Charles & Dafoulas, Georgios A., 2023. "Digital exclusion and relative digital deprivation: Exploring factors and moderators of internet non-use in the UK," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    5. Yueping Zheng & Liang Ma, 2022. "How Citizen Demand Affects the Process of M-Government Adoption: An Empirical Study in China," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1407-1433, December.
    6. Hao, Xiaoli & Miao, Erxiang & Sun, Qingyu & Li, Ke & Wen, Shufang & Xue, Yan, 2024. "The impact of digital government on corporate green innovation: Evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    7. Patrycja Szarek-Iwaniuk & Adam Senetra, 2020. "Access to ICT in Poland and the Co-Creation of Urban Space in the Process of Modern Social Participation in a Smart City—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Aleksandra Kuzior & Dariusz Krawczyk & Joanna Kubicka & Viera Zozulankova & Krystyna Jedralska & Tetyana Nestorenko, 2024. "Public Perception of the Management of the Implementation of Solutions from the Smart City," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 1180-1195.
    9. Xiao Yu & Shu Liu, 2022. "Disparities in Online Use Behaviours and Chinese Digital Inclusion: A 10-Year Comparison," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-21, September.
    10. Kris Hartley, 2023. "Public Perceptions About Smart Cities: Governance and Quality-of-Life in Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 731-753, April.
    11. Eduardo de Sá Fortes Leitão Rodrigues, 2021. "Citizens' Confidence in Government and Inefficient Public Spending. Is there a Trust Trap?," Working Papers REM 2021/0199, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    12. Zou, Han & Zhong, MeiRui, 2024. "Local environmental constraints and city's position in dual value chain: What role does digital technology play?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    13. John Coffie Azamela & Zhiwei Tang & Owusu Ackah & Swanzy Awozum, 2022. "Assessing the Antecedents of E-Government Adoption: A Case of the Ghanaian Public Sector," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    14. Luca Dal Bene & Paolo Franchi & Antonella Garna & Giacomo Pieraccioli & Monica Piovi & Paolo Torrico, 2022. "La digitalizzazione dei servizi di supporto in sanità. L?esperienza di ESTAR," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(123), pages 195-209.
    15. Lissitsa, Sabina, 2021. "Effects of digital use on trust in political institutions among ethnic minority and hegemonic group – A case study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    16. Setthasuravich, Prasongchai & Sirikhan, Kulacha & Kato, Hironori, 2024. "Spatial econometric analysis of the digital divide in Thailand at the sub-district level: Patterns and determinants," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8).
    17. Sergey Revyakin & Alvaro da Rocha, 2021. "An Empirical Investigation Of E-Government Adoption In Russia: Access, Rights, Trust And Citizens Experience," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 5, pages 137-160.
    18. Georgios Kontogeorgis & Nikolaos Varotsis, 2021. "Reinstating Greek E-Governance: A Framework For E-Government Benchmarking, Improvement And Government Policies," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 6, pages 103-127.
    19. Bruno, Giuseppe & Diglio, Antonio & Piccolo, Carmela & Pipicelli, Eduardo, 2023. "A reduced Composite Indicator for Digital Divide measurement at the regional level: An application to the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    20. Xin Ye & Xiaoyan Su & Zhijun Yao & Lu-an Dong & Qiang Lin & Shuo Yu, 2023. "How Do Citizens View Digital Government Services? Study on Digital Government Service Quality Based on Citizen Feedback," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-24, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04576-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.