IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8913-d1766538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Network Equilibrium Analysis of Dual-Channel Environmental Hotel Supply Chains with M&A Using Variational Inequalities

Author

Listed:
  • Preeyanuch Chuasuk

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Burapha University, Chonburi 20131, Thailand)

  • Shinawat Horayangkura

    (Trade Competition Commission of Thailand, Government Complex Building C, 120 Chaengwattana Road, Thung Song Hong, Lak Si, Bangkok 10210, Thailand)

Abstract

This paper develops a dual-channel environmental hotel supply chain equilibrium model to investigate the impact of mergers and acquisitions (M&A), decision makers’ altruistic preferences, and consumers’ low-carbon preferences under demand uncertainty. The model incorporates hotels, online travel agency (OTA) platforms, and demand markets and captures interactions under both the merchant and agency models. Variational inequalities are employed to describe interdependent decision-making behaviors, and the projection gradient algorithm is used to obtain equilibrium solutions. The numerical analysis reveals that sustainability factors directly affect the profitability of both hotels and OTAs. Under the agency model, higher commission rates reduce hotel profits while significantly increasing OTA gains. When comparing the merchant and agency models without M&A, the merchant model yields higher hotel profits, whereas the agency model favors OTAs. Furthermore, when M&A is combined with altruistic preferences, the utility of hotels and OTAs under the agency model reaches the highest level, while M&A offers limited advantages for OTAs. Overall, the findings highlight that sustainability factors, altruistic preferences, and M&A jointly interact with merchant and agency governance structures to shape profitability and utility. These results provide theoretical insights and managerial implications for developing resilient, cooperative, and low-carbon hotel supply chains under demand uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Preeyanuch Chuasuk & Shinawat Horayangkura, 2025. "Network Equilibrium Analysis of Dual-Channel Environmental Hotel Supply Chains with M&A Using Variational Inequalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-30, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8913-:d:1766538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8913/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8913/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bassi, Matteo & Pagnozzi, Marco & Piccolo, Salvatore, 2014. "Optimal contracting with altruism and reciprocity," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 27-38.
    2. Nagurney, Anna & Cruz, Jose & Dong, June & Zhang, Ding, 2005. "Supply chain networks, electronic commerce, and supply side and demand side risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(1), pages 120-142, July.
    3. Liu, Zugang & Wang, Jia, 2019. "Supply chain network equilibrium with strategic supplier investment: A real options perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 184-198.
    4. Liu, Zugang & Nagurney, Anna, 2011. "Supply chain outsourcing under exchange rate risk and competition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 539-549, October.
    5. Sari, Kazim & Suslu, Murat, 2018. "A modeling approach for evaluating green performance of a hotel supply chain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 53-60.
    6. Zhou, Yan & Chan, Chi Kin & Wong, Kar Hung, 2018. "A multi-period supply chain network equilibrium model considering retailers’ uncertain demands and dynamic loss-averse behaviors," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 51-76.
    7. Nagurney, Anna & Dong, June & Zhang, Ding, 2002. "A supply chain network equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 281-303, September.
    8. Hsueh, Che-Fu & Chang, Mei-Shiang, 2008. "Equilibrium analysis and corporate social responsibility for supply chain integration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(1), pages 116-129, October.
    9. Dong, June & Zhang, Ding & Nagurney, Anna, 2004. "A supply chain network equilibrium model with random demands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(1), pages 194-212, July.
    10. Jianhong Tao & Muhammad Aamir & Muhammad Shoaib & Nosheena Yasir & Muhammad Babar, 2025. "Bridging the Gap Between Supply Chain Risk and Organizational Performance Conditioning to Demand Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-21, March.
    11. Fich, Eliezer M. & Nguyen, Tu, 2020. "The value of CEOs' supply chain experience: Evidence from mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    12. Yi Yang & Xiaoyan Gu & Xingfen Wang, 2025. "Supply Chain Resilience Review: Visual Analysis Based on Knowledge Map," Lecture Notes in Operations Research, in: Daqing Gong & Yixuan Ma & Jonathan Foster-Pedley & Juliang Zhang (ed.), Liss 2024, pages 288-303, Springer.
    13. Tien-Chin Wang & Chin-Ying Huang & Shu-Li Huang & Jen-Yao Lee, 2021. "Priority Weights for Predicting the Success of Hotel Sustainable Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-23, December.
    14. C. Gizem Korpeoglu & Ersin Körpeoğlu & Soo-Haeng Cho, 2020. "Supply Chain Competition: A Market Game Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5648-5664, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chan, Chi Kin & Zhou, Yan & Wong, Kar Hung, 2019. "An equilibrium model of the supply chain network under multi-attribute behaviors analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 514-535.
    2. Yongtao Peng & Bohai Chen & Eleonora Veglianti, 2022. "Platform Service Supply Chain Network Equilibrium Model with Data Empowerment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Hsueh, Che-Fu & Chang, Mei-Shiang, 2008. "Equilibrium analysis and corporate social responsibility for supply chain integration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(1), pages 116-129, October.
    4. Zugang Liu & Anna Nagurney, 2013. "Supply chain networks with global outsourcing and quick-response production under demand and cost uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 208(1), pages 251-289, September.
    5. Xue Chen & Jun Li & Zhongbao Wang, 2023. "Equilibrium Decisions for Fresh Product Supply Chain Considering Consumers’ Freshness Preference," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 771-797, September.
    6. Yamada, Tadashi & Imai, Koji & Nakamura, Takamasa & Taniguchi, Eiichi, 2011. "A supply chain-transport supernetwork equilibrium model with the behaviour of freight carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 887-907.
    7. Meng, Qiang & Huang, Yikai & Cheu, Ruey Long, 2009. "Competitive facility location on decentralized supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 487-499, July.
    8. Qiang, Qiang & Ke, Ke & Anderson, Trisha & Dong, June, 2013. "The closed-loop supply chain network with competition, distribution channel investment, and uncertainties," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 186-194.
    9. Wang, Xiaolei & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Yang, Hai & Bai, Yun, 2013. "Optimal biofuel supply chain design under consumption mandates with renewable identification numbers," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 158-171.
    10. Nagurney, Anna & Ke, Ke, 2006. "Financial networks with intermediation: Risk management with variable weights," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(1), pages 40-63, July.
    11. Caiquan Duan & Guoyi Xiu & Fengmin Yao, 2019. "Multi-Period E-Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Considering Consumers’ Preference for Products and AI-Push," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-32, August.
    12. Caiquan Duan & Fengmin Yao & Zhongqiu Li & Hui Yu, 2022. "Multi‐period closed‐loop supply chain network equilibrium considering CSR investment and sharing mechanism," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1579-1595, July.
    13. Konstantinos Liagkouras & Konstantinos Metaxiotis, 2023. "Sources of Uncertainty and Risk Quantification Methods in Supply Chain Management: A Literature Study," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 1-42, December.
    14. Célestin Elock Son, 2018. "Supply Chain Risk Management: A Review of Thirteen Years of Research," Post-Print hal-03029453, HAL.
    15. Tatsuya Hirano & Yasushi Narushima, 2019. "Robust Supply Chain Network Equilibrium Model," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 1196-1212, July.
    16. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Rezapour, Shabnam & Drezner, Tammy & Fallah, Samira, 2014. "Competitive supply chain network design: An overview of classifications, models, solution techniques and applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 92-118.
    17. Yan Zhou & Xue-Qi Liu & Kar-Hung Wong, 2021. "Remanufacturing Policies Options for a Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    18. Wu, Xin & Nie, Lei & Xu, Meng & Yan, Fei, 2018. "A perishable food supply chain problem considering demand uncertainty and time deadline constraints: Modeling and application to a high-speed railway catering service," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 186-209.
    19. Li, Xiaojing & Chen, Jing & Ai, Xingzheng, 2019. "Contract design in a cross-sales supply chain with demand information asymmetry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 939-956.
    20. Heckmann, Iris & Comes, Tina & Nickel, Stefan, 2015. "A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 119-132.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8913-:d:1766538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.