IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6640-d572663.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remanufacturing Policies Options for a Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Zhou

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Xue-Qi Liu

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Kar-Hung Wong

    (School of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa)

Abstract

Due to the need for resource utilization and environmental protection, remanufacturing is used as an effective means to achieve a circular economy. To focus on the production and sales of new products, manufacturers outsource the remanufacturing of used products to remanufacturers. Aiming at helping manufacturers to choose between self-remanufacturing and outsourcing remanufacturing policies, a closed-loop supply chain network equilibrium model considering the remanufacturing policy options is established. The equilibrium decision-making is obtained by using the variational inequality method. Furthermore, the criteria for manufacturers to choose between the two remanufacturing policies based on different factors such as recovery rates of the used products, remanufacturing costs, and environmental impact parameters, are given. Numerical examples show the following results: (1) When compared with self-remanufacturing policy, outsourcing remanufacturing policy can save resources, increase the sales of products, and have a smaller environmental impact. (2) When the recycling rate of used products is low, choosing an outsourcing remanufacturing policy can increase the sales of products. When the recycling rate is high, choosing a self-remanufacturing policy can get more profits. (3) When the costs of a self-remanufacturing policy and an outsource-remanufacturing policy are quite different, choosing the outsourcing remanufacturing policy can save resources and protect the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Zhou & Xue-Qi Liu & Kar-Hung Wong, 2021. "Remanufacturing Policies Options for a Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6640-:d:572663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6640/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6640/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zou, Zong-Bao & Wang, Jian-Jun & Deng, Gui-Shi & Chen, Haozhe, 2016. "Third-party remanufacturing mode selection: Outsourcing or authorization?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-19.
    2. Lin Sun & Lingjiang Zhang & Youwei Li, 2018. "Sustainable Decisions on Product Upgrade Confrontations with Remanufacturing Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Gökçe Esenduran & Eda Kemahlıoğlu-Ziya & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2017. "Impact of Take-Back Regulation on the Remanufacturing Industry," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(5), pages 924-944, May.
    4. Mitra, Subrata, 2016. "Models to explore remanufacturing as a competitive strategy under duopoly," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 215-227.
    5. Lan Wang & Gangshu (George) Cai & Andy A. Tsay & Asoo J. Vakharia, 2017. "Design of the Reverse Channel for Remanufacturing: Must Profit-Maximization Harm the Environment?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(8), pages 1585-1603, August.
    6. Zhu, Qinghua & Li, Helong & Zhao, Senlin & Lun, Venus, 2016. "Redesign of service modes for remanufactured products and its financial benefits," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P2), pages 231-240.
    7. Zongbao Zou & Fan Wang & Xiaofan Lai & Jingxian Hong, 2019. "How Does Licensing Remanufacturing Affect the Supply Chain Considering Customer Environmental Awareness?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, March.
    8. Nagurney, Anna & Toyasaki, Fuminori, 2005. "Reverse supply chain management and electronic waste recycling: a multitiered network equilibrium framework for e-cycling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 1-28, January.
    9. Caiquan Duan & Guoyi Xiu & Fengmin Yao, 2019. "Multi-Period E-Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Considering Consumers’ Preference for Products and AI-Push," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-32, August.
    10. Qiang, Qiang & Ke, Ke & Anderson, Trisha & Dong, June, 2013. "The closed-loop supply chain network with competition, distribution channel investment, and uncertainties," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 186-194.
    11. Hammond, David & Beullens, Patrick, 2007. "Closed-loop supply chain network equilibrium under legislation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(2), pages 895-908, December.
    12. Wei Yan & Junwu Chai & Zhifeng Qian & Sang-Bing Tsai & Hong Chen & Yu Xiong, 2018. "Operational Decisions on Remanufacturing Outsourcing Involved with Corporate Environmental and Social Responsibility—A Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    13. Wei He & Lan Liang & Kai Wang, 2020. "Economic and Environmental Implications of Quality Choice under Remanufacturing Outsourcing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Yang, Guang-fen & Wang, Zhi-ping & Li, Xiao-qiang, 2009. "The optimization of the closed-loop supply chain network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 16-28, January.
    15. Zhou, Yan & Chan, Chi Kin & Wong, Kar Hung, 2018. "A multi-period supply chain network equilibrium model considering retailers’ uncertain demands and dynamic loss-averse behaviors," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 51-76.
    16. Nagurney, Anna & Dong, June & Zhang, Ding, 2002. "A supply chain network equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 281-303, September.
    17. Alumur, Sibel A. & Nickel, Stefan & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco & Verter, Vedat, 2012. "Multi-period reverse logistics network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 67-78.
    18. Wang, Nengmin & He, Qidong & Jiang, Bin, 2019. "Hybrid closed-loop supply chains with competition in recycling and product markets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 246-258.
    19. Chan, Chi Kin & Zhou, Yan & Wong, Kar Hung, 2018. "A dynamic equilibrium model of the oligopolistic closed-loop supply chain network under uncertain and time-dependent demands," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 325-354.
    20. Alegoz, Mehmet & Kaya, Onur & Bayindir, Z. Pelin, 2021. "A comparison of pure manufacturing and hybrid manufacturing–remanufacturing systems under carbon tax policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 161-173.
    21. Diabat, Ali & Jebali, Aida, 2021. "Multi-product and multi-period closed loop supply chain network design under take-back legislation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    22. Haixiang Wu & Bing Xu & Ding Zhang, 2019. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Equilibrium Model with Subsidy on Green Supply Chain Technology Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-26, August.
    23. Ameknassi, Lhoussaine & Aït-Kadi, Daoud & Rezg, Nidhal, 2016. "Integration of logistics outsourcing decisions in a green supply chain design: A stochastic multi-objective multi-period multi-product programming model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 165-184.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yan Zhou & Xin-Tong Lin & Zhi-Ping Fan & Kar-Hung Wong, 2022. "Remanufacturing Strategy Choice of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Considering Carbon Emission Trading, Green Innovation, and Green Consumers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-42, June.
    2. Xuemei Zhang & Jiawei Hu & Suqin Sun & Guohu Qi, 2022. "Extended Warranty Strategy and Its Environment Impact of Remanufactured Supply Chain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Juan Tang & An‐Lin Song & Chang‐Yi Liu & Zhi Liu, 2023. "Optimal decisions in a remanufacturing supply chain under money‐back guarantees," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(4), pages 2254-2277, June.
    4. Yan Zhou & Miao Hou & Kar-Hung Wong, 2023. "The Optimal Remanufacturing Strategy of the Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network under Government Regulation and the Manufacturer’s Design for the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-34, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei He & Lan Liang & Kai Wang, 2020. "Economic and Environmental Implications of Quality Choice under Remanufacturing Outsourcing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Yang, Yuxiang & Goodarzi, Shadi & Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam, 2022. "In-house production and outsourcing under different emissions reduction regulations: An equilibrium decision model for global supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. E. Allevi & A. Gnudi & I. V. Konnov & G. Oggioni, 2018. "Evaluating the effects of environmental regulations on a closed-loop supply chain network: a variational inequality approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 261(1), pages 1-43, February.
    4. Guitao Zhang & Xiao Zhang & Hao Sun & Xinyu Zhao, 2021. "Three-Echelon Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Equilibrium under Cap-and-Trade Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Chan, Chi Kin & Zhou, Yan & Wong, Kar Hung, 2019. "An equilibrium model of the supply chain network under multi-attribute behaviors analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 514-535.
    6. Hamdouch, Younes & Ghoudi, Kilani, 2020. "A Supply Chain Equilibrium Model with General Price-Dependent Demand," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    7. Yan Zhou & Miao Hou & Kar-Hung Wong, 2023. "The Optimal Remanufacturing Strategy of the Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network under Government Regulation and the Manufacturer’s Design for the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-34, April.
    8. Ehsan Shekarian & Simme Douwe Flapper, 2021. "Analyzing the Structure of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    9. Tao, Zhang Gui & Guang, Zhong Yong & Hao, Sun & Song, Hu Jin & Xin, Dai Geng, 2015. "Multi-period closed-loop supply chain network equilibrium with carbon emission constraints," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PB), pages 354-365.
    10. Younes Hamdouch & Qiang Patrick Qiang & Kilani Ghoudi, 2017. "A Closed-Loop Supply Chain Equilibrium Model with Random and Price-Sensitive Demand and Return," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 459-503, June.
    11. Zhou, Yan & Chan, Chi Kin & Wong, Kar Hung, 2018. "A multi-period supply chain network equilibrium model considering retailers’ uncertain demands and dynamic loss-averse behaviors," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 51-76.
    12. Yan Zhou & Xin-Tong Lin & Zhi-Ping Fan & Kar-Hung Wong, 2022. "Remanufacturing Strategy Choice of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Considering Carbon Emission Trading, Green Innovation, and Green Consumers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-42, June.
    13. Georgia Fargetta & Laura R. M. Scrimali, 2023. "A sustainable dynamic closed-loop supply chain network equilibrium for collectibles markets," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-30, December.
    14. Sung Hoon Chung & Robert D. Weaver & Hyun Woo Jeon, 2020. "Sustainable Management of Remanufacturing in Dynamic Supply Chains," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 703-731, September.
    15. Qiang, Qiang & Ke, Ke & Anderson, Trisha & Dong, June, 2013. "The closed-loop supply chain network with competition, distribution channel investment, and uncertainties," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 186-194.
    16. Yang, Yuxiang & Goodarzi, Shadi & Bozorgi, Ali & Fahimnia, Behnam, 2021. "Carbon cap-and-trade schemes in closed-loop supply chains: Why firms do not comply?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    17. Govindan, Kannan & Soleimani, Hamed & Kannan, Devika, 2015. "Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 603-626.
    18. Zhang, Abraham & Wang, Jason X. & Farooque, Muhammad & Wang, Yulan & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2021. "Multi-dimensional circular supply chain management: A comparative review of the state-of-the-art practices and research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    19. Toyasaki, Fuminori & Daniele, Patrizia & Wakolbinger, Tina, 2014. "A variational inequality formulation of equilibrium models for end-of-life products with nonlinear constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 340-350.
    20. Yanli Fang & Zhuoyi Ren & Fang Yang, 2023. "The Impact of Carbon Allowance Allocation Rules on Remanufacturing Decisions in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-24, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6640-:d:572663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.