IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8315-d1750936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Removing Policy Burdens Improve SOEs’ ESG Performance? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Peiyu Zhao

    (School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China)

  • Jiajun Xu

    (School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 210024, China)

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the global sustainable development agenda and deepening reforms of China’s state-owned enterprises (SOEs), the restrictive effect of policy burdens on the long-term development capacity of SOEs has become increasingly prominent. How to break this constraint through policy reforms has become critical. This study takes China’s policy on the transfer of heating, power, water supply, and estate in the residential quarters of SOE employees (HPWET) as a quasi-natural experiment. Employing data from 2012 to 2024 on Chinese A-share SOEs listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen, combined with the staggered difference-in-differences method, to explore the impact of removing policy burdens (RPB) on the ESG performance of SOEs and the underlying mechanisms. Results show that RPB significantly improves SOEs’ ESG performance, with an average increase of 14.2% in the ESG performance of SOEs in the treatment group. This effect is more pronounced in large SOEs, those in regions with higher levels of technology marketization, and SOEs in light-pollution industries. Mechanism tests indicate that the improvement of the green innovation level, the reduction in political connections, and the optimization of the corporate governance environment are the core paths of action. This study further broadens the research perspective on SOE policy burdens, enriches the understanding of macro-policy drivers of the ESG performance, and provides new empirical evidence for emerging economies to break through the bottleneck of ESG development in SOEs through institutional reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Peiyu Zhao & Jiajun Xu, 2025. "Can Removing Policy Burdens Improve SOEs’ ESG Performance? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-28, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8315-:d:1750936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8315/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8315/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mu, Weiwei & Liu, Kefu & Tao, Yunqing & Ye, Yongwei, 2023. "Digital finance and corporate ESG," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    2. Fan, Joseph P.H. & Wong, T.J. & Zhang, Tianyu, 2007. "Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 330-357, May.
    3. Peiyu Zhao & Jiajun Xu, 2024. "Analysis of Residents’ Livelihoods in Transformed Shantytowns: A Case Study of a Resource-Based City in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, February.
    4. Lin, Yongjia & Fu, Xiaoqing & Fu, Xiaolan, 2021. "Varieties in state capitalism and corporate innovation: Evidence from an emerging economy," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Iwasaki, Ichiro & Ma, Xinxin & Mizobata, Satoshi, 2022. "Ownership structure and firm performance in emerging markets: A comparative meta-analysis of East European EU member states, Russia and China," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 46(2).
    6. Fisman, Raymond & Gatti, Roberta, 2002. "Decentralization and corruption: evidence across countries," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 325-345, March.
    7. Asuman Erben Yavuz & Bade Ekim Kocaman & Mesut Doğan & Adalet Hazar & Şenol Babuşcu & Raikhan Sutbayeva, 2024. "The Impact of Corporate Governance on Sustainability Disclosures: A Comparison from the Perspective of Financial and Non-Financial Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Jeffry M. Netter & William L. Megginson, 2001. "From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 39(2), pages 321-389, June.
    9. Wang, Qing & Xu, Yaping, 2025. "Can industry competition stimulate enterprises ESG performance?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA).
    10. Min-Jung Kang & Seul-Gi Oh & Ho-Young Lee, 2022. "The Association between Outside Directors’ Compensation and ESG Performance: Evidence from Korean Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Curi, Claudia & Mancuso, Paolo & Scarpa, Alessandro, 2025. "State-owned enterprises: A bibliometric review and research agenda," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    12. Grazia Dicuonzo & Francesca Donofrio & Simona Ranaldo & Vittorio Dell'Atti, 2022. "The effect of innovation on environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(4), pages 1191-1209, April.
    13. Zeng, Yongliang & Zhao, Xiangfang & Zhu, Yiwen, 2023. "Equity incentives and ESG performance: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    14. Eckel, Catherine C & Vermaelen, Theo, 1986. "Internal Regulation: The Effects of Government Ownership on the Value of the Firm," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(2), pages 381-403, October.
    15. Tang, Chun & Wu, Yizhong & Liu, Xiaoxing, 2025. "Does China's national carbon market play a role? Evidence from corporate ESG performance," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1053-1064.
    16. Nicola Del Sarto, 2025. "Corporate Governance and ESG Controversies: Navigating Risk‐Taking in Banks," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 4541-4560, May.
    17. Yingyi Qian, 1996. "Enterprise reform in China: agency problems and political control," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 4(2), pages 427-447, October.
    18. Zhang, Shijin & Zhang, Weiwei & Chen, Fu & Guo, Bingxin, 2023. "Does the mixed-ownership reform of Chinese state-owned enterprises improves their total factor productivity?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    19. Piotr Matuszak & Katarzyna Szarzec, 2019. "The Scale and Financial Performance of State-Owned Enterprises in the CEE Region," Acta Oeconomica, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 69(4), pages 549-570, December.
    20. Holmstrom, Bengt & Milgrom, Paul, 1991. "Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 7(0), pages 24-52, Special I.
    21. Fang, Hao & Yang, J. Jimmy, 2025. "Foreign institutional investor herding and ESG ratings," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    22. Lin, Justin Yifu & Li, Zhiyun, 2008. "Policy burden, privatization and soft budget constraint," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 90-102, March.
    23. Zhu, Yan & Zhang, Zhuyun, 2024. "Supply chain digitalization and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from supply chain innovation and application pilot policy," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    24. Cai, Ye & Pan, Carrie H. & Statman, Meir, 2016. "Why do countries matter so much in corporate social performance?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 591-609.
    25. Maria Baldini & Lorenzo Dal Maso & Giovanni Liberatore & Francesco Mazzi & Simone Terzani, 2018. "Role of Country- and Firm-Level Determinants in Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 79-98, June.
    26. Hong Bo & Tao Li & Linda A. Toolsema, 2009. "Corporate Social Responsibility Investment And Social Objectives: An Examination On Social Welfare Investment Of Chinese State Owned Enterprises," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 56(3), pages 267-295, July.
    27. Nguyen Cong Phuong & Tran Dinh Khoi Nguyen & Ha Phuoc Vu, 2020. "Politics and institution of corporate governance in Vietnamese state-owned enterprises," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(5), pages 667-684, March.
    28. Carole RENTSCH & Matthias FINGER, 2015. "Yes, No, Maybe: The Ambiguous Relationships Between State-Owned Enterprises And The State," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 86(4), pages 617-640, December.
    29. Weiguo Zhong & Yanfeng Zheng, 2025. "Do political connections stifle firm innovation? Natural experimental evidence from China's anti‐corruption campaigns," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(5), pages 1183-1216, May.
    30. repec:eme:maj000:maj-02-2018-1810 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Di & Zhu, Yongyi, 2025. "Executives with digital backgrounds and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    2. Hongyang Zhao & Dongmei Wang & Zhihong Zhang & Xiangrong Hao, 2024. "Does the Classified Reform of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises Alleviate Environmental, Social and Governance Decoupling?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-29, December.
    3. Ding, Mingfa, 2014. "Political Connections and Stock Liquidity: Political Network, Hierarchy and Intervention," Knut Wicksell Working Paper Series 2014/7, Lund University, Knut Wicksell Centre for Financial Studies.
    4. Zhang, Yufei & Liu, Deqiang, 2024. "China's mixed-ownership reform and SOE profitability," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 496-520.
    5. Liu, Sun, 2015. "Corporate governance and forward-looking disclosure: Evidence from China," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 16-30.
    6. Johansson, Anders C. & Luo, Danglun & Rickne, Johanna & Zheng, Wei, 2016. "Government Intervention in the Capital Allocation Process: Firm Employment as an IPO Selection Rule in China," Stockholm School of Economics Asia Working Paper Series 2016-40, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm China Economic Research Institute.
    7. Pan, Xia & Cheng, Wenyin & Gao, Yuning, 2022. "The impact of privatization of state-owned enterprises on innovation in China: A tale of privatization degree," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    8. Cheng, Bo & An, Zhimeng & Li, Wei, 2025. "Regulatory enforcement and firm sustainability: Evidence from China's environmental public interest litigation reform," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 530-545.
    9. Kevin Amess & Jun Du & Sourafel Girma, 2009. "Full and Partial Privatization in China: The Labor Consequences," Discussion Papers 09/11, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    10. Anders C. Johansson & Xunan Feng, 2016. "The state advances, the private sector retreats? Firm effects of China’s great stimulus programme," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 40(6), pages 1635-1668.
    11. Alexander Ljungqvist & Donghua Chen & Dequan Jiang & Haitian Lu & Mingming Zhou, 2015. "State Capitalism vs. Private Enterprise," NBER Working Papers 20930, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Xie, Sujuan & Lin, Bingxuan & Li, Jingjing, 2022. "Political Control, Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Case of China," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. Hu, Fang & Leung, Sidney C.M., 2012. "Top management turnover, firm performance and government control: Evidence from China's listed state-owned enterprises," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 235-262.
    14. Xu, Jian & Yin, Jian, 2025. "Digital transformation and ESG performance: The chain mediating role of technological innovation and financing constraints," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    15. Xianghua Li & Ying Hu & Xiaodi Guo & Min Wang, 2024. "Government Environmental Information Regulation and Corporate ESG Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-20, September.
    16. Jim Huangnan Shen & Weiping Li & Chien‐Chiang Lee, 2023. "Unlocking the myths of size expansion in China's large state‐owned enterprises: Theory and evidence," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 1264-1284, March.
    17. Dongwei Su & Xingxing He, 2012. "Ownership structure, corporate governance and productive efficiency in China," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 303-318, December.
    18. Xin Xie & Shaokang Wu & Ghulam Subhani & Sakina, 2025. "Analyzing how digital orientation contributes to organizational innovation and environmental, social and governance performance through digital inclusion and capabilities," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-22, December.
    19. Li, Larry & McMurray, Adela & Sy, Malick & Xue, Jinjun, 2018. "Corporate ownership, efficiency and performance under state capitalism: Evidence from China," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 747-766.
    20. Paul H. Jensen & Robin E. Stonecash, 2004. "The Efficiency of Public Sector Outsourcing Contracts: A Literature Review," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2004n29, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8315-:d:1750936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.