IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i18p8190-d1481592.html

Government Environmental Information Regulation and Corporate ESG Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Xianghua Li

    (Business School, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Ying Hu

    (Business School, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Xiaodi Guo

    (Business School, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Min Wang

    (Audit Division, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

China’s environmental, social, and governance (ESG) actions are driven by multiple factors, among which the government is an indispensable key player. This paper empirically examines the impact of government environmental information regulation (GEIR) on corporate ESG performance using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies in heavily polluting industries from 2011 to 2021, with a GEIR in 2014 as an exogenous shock. GEIR is found to significantly improve corporate ESG performance, which is mainly reflected in the environmental and social dimensions. Moreover, improvements in the quality of corporate information disclosure and the efficiency of green innovation are found to be the main paths through which GEIR enhances corporate ESG performance. Further research shows that the enhancement effect of GEIR is more obvious in firms with low political relevance, high investor attention, and low marketization in the region in which they are located. This work enriches the research on GEIR and corporate ESG performance and provides some references for promoting the government to play a key role in China’s ESG initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianghua Li & Ying Hu & Xiaodi Guo & Min Wang, 2024. "Government Environmental Information Regulation and Corporate ESG Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8190-:d:1481592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/8190/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/8190/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dayuan Li & Min Huang & Shenggang Ren & Xiaohong Chen & Lutao Ning, 2018. "Environmental Legitimacy, Green Innovation, and Corporate Carbon Disclosure: Evidence from CDP China 100," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 1089-1104, July.
    2. Fan, Joseph P.H. & Wong, T.J. & Zhang, Tianyu, 2007. "Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 330-357, May.
    3. Jing-Wen Huang & Yong-Hui Li, 2017. "Green Innovation and Performance: The View of Organizational Capability and Social Reciprocity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 309-324, October.
    4. Lin, Yongjia & Fu, Xiaoqing & Fu, Xiaolan, 2021. "Varieties in state capitalism and corporate innovation: Evidence from an emerging economy," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Samuel Drempetic & Christian Klein & Bernhard Zwergel, 2020. "The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 333-360, November.
    6. Fernando García & Jairo González-Bueno & Francisco Guijarro & Javier Oliver, 2020. "Forecasting the Environmental, Social, and Governance Rating of Firms by Using Corporate Financial Performance Variables: A Rough Set Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    7. Dong Ding & Bin Liu & Millicent Chang, 2023. "Carbon Emissions and TCFD Aligned Climate-Related Information Disclosures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(4), pages 967-1001, February.
    8. Beat Reber & Agnes Gold & Stefan Gold, 2022. "ESG Disclosure and Idiosyncratic Risk in Initial Public Offerings," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 867-886, September.
    9. Ginglinger, Edith & Raskopf, Caroline, 2023. "Women directors and E&S performance: Evidence from board gender quotas," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    10. Tamas Barko & Martijn Cremers & Luc Renneboog, 2022. "Shareholder Engagement on Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 777-812, October.
    11. Maria Baldini & Lorenzo Dal Maso & Giovanni Liberatore & Francesco Mazzi & Simone Terzani, 2018. "Role of Country- and Firm-Level Determinants in Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 79-98, June.
    12. Glaeser, Stephen, 2018. "The effects of proprietary information on corporate disclosure and transparency: Evidence from trade secrets," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 163-193.
    13. He, Kang & Chen, Wanyi & Zhang, Liguang, 2021. "Senior management's academic experience and corporate green innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    14. Mara Faccio, 2006. "Politically Connected Firms," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(1), pages 369-386, March.
    15. Ding, Jinxiu & Li, Lingxue & Zhao, Jinsong, 2024. "How does fintech prompt corporations toward ESG sustainable development? Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    16. Denis Cormier & Michel Magnan, 2015. "The Economic Relevance of Environmental Disclosure and its Impact on Corporate Legitimacy: An Empirical Investigation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 431-450, September.
    17. Huang, Qiping & Li, Yongjia & Lin, Meimei & McBrayer, Garrett A., 2022. "Natural disasters, risk salience, and corporate ESG disclosure," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    18. Zhang, Dongyang & Bai, Dingchuan & Chen, Xingyu, 2024. "Can crude oil futures market volatility motivate peer firms in competing ESG performance? An exploration of Shanghai International Energy Exchange," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mengdi Qin & Eunmi Tatum Lee, 2024. "Does Information Transparency Moderate the Relationship Between ESG and Green Innovation? Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Xingyuan Yao & Zheqiu Wang & Kangze Zheng & Qingfan Lin & Weiming Lin & Yufen Zhong, 2025. "Environmental Policy Shocks and Manufacturing Resilience: A Multi-Path Mechanism and Regional Heterogeneity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-31, June.
    3. Abdullah Alghafis & Haneen Bawayan & Sultan Alghamdi & Mohamed Nejlaoui & Abdullah Alrashidi, 2025. "Harnessing Renewable Waste as a Pathway and Opportunities Toward Sustainability in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-30, October.
    4. Daniel Knapp & Niklas Bayrle-Kelso & Arabella Nigg-Stock & Leo Brecht, 2025. "The Impact of Governmental Regulations and Environmental Activities on Innovation Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Bo & An, Zhimeng & Li, Wei, 2025. "Regulatory enforcement and firm sustainability: Evidence from China's environmental public interest litigation reform," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 530-545.
    2. Liu, Xutang & Boubaker, Sabri & Liao, Jing & Yao, Shouyu, 2025. "The rise of common state ownership and corporate environmental performance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    3. Feng He & Lin Duan & Jing Hao, 2025. "The impact of managerial climate attention on corporate ESG performance—evidence from China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Alan Kai Ming Au & Yi-Fan Yang & Huan Wang & Rui-Hong Chen & Leven J. Zheng, 2023. "Mapping the Landscape of ESG Strategies: A Bibliometric Review and Recommendations for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Feng, Chao & Wang, Ying & Cheng, Xi, 2025. "Local governmental environmental responsibility and corporate greenwashing: Quasi-experimental evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    6. Aurang Zeb & Irfan Ullah & Amjad Iqbal & Mohib Ur Rahman & Shahab Aziz, 2024. "CEO’s Science and Engineering Background and Green Innovation: Evidence From China," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, February.
    7. Lai, Zichen & Lian, Yitian & Zhao, Feng & Zheng, Yaomin, 2025. "Green at the top: How CEOs’ environmental experience shapes ESG performance in Chinese firms," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. Meng Li & Zengrui Tian & Qian Liu & Yuzhong Lu, 2022. "Literature Review and Research Prospect on the Drivers and Effects of Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Dong, Jinjin & Shao, Meirong, 2025. "The impact of technology for social good (TSG) on the effectiveness of corporate ESG self-regulation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    10. Yu, Lin & Ye, Jiahui & Yang, Lin, 2025. "From endowed trust to earned trust: Firms located in trusted regions," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA).
    11. Chang Liu & Zihao Xin, 2024. "Does environmental, social, and governance practice boost corporate human capital inflow in China? From the perspective of stakeholder response," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3251-3273, July.
    12. Xinping Ji & Xinjian Huang, 2025. "ESG Performance and Corporate M&A Behavior—Based on the Dual Perspectives of the Quantity and Quality of M&As," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, October.
    13. Jonathan Taglialatela & Roberto Barontini & Francesco Testa & Fabio Iraldo, 2024. "Blockholders and the ESG performance of M&A targets," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 625-650, June.
    14. Cheng, Zhonghua & Su, Yang, 2024. "ESG and Chinese corporate OFDI," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(PA).
    15. Wang, Kai & Chen, Xi & Wang, Chenye, 2023. "The impact of sustainable development planning in resource-based cities on corporate ESG–Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PA).
    16. Li, Mangmang & Tang, Jinghua & Wu, Dingwen, 2025. "Beyond borders and industries: How cross-ownership drives ESG performance in China’ low-polluting firms after environmental regulation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    17. Peiyu Zhao & Jiajun Xu, 2025. "Can Removing Policy Burdens Improve SOEs’ ESG Performance? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-28, September.
    18. Yu Wang & Michel Magnan & Yetaotao Qiu, 2025. "Going Green: An Analysis of Mutual Fund Investment and Green Innovation in the Context of China," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(12), pages 3547-3584, December.
    19. Ding, Jinxiu & Li, Lingxue & Zhao, Jinsong, 2024. "How does fintech prompt corporations toward ESG sustainable development? Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    20. Liu, Xiaoqian & Cifuentes-Faura, Javier & Zhao, Shikuan & Wang, Long, 2024. "The impact of government environmental attention on firms’ ESG performance: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8190-:d:1481592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.