IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5932-d1689140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Policy Shocks and Manufacturing Resilience: A Multi-Path Mechanism and Regional Heterogeneity Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Xingyuan Yao

    (College of Digital Economy, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Quanzhou 362406, China)

  • Zheqiu Wang

    (College of Digital Economy, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Quanzhou 362406, China)

  • Kangze Zheng

    (College of Rural Revitalization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Qingfan Lin

    (College of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Weiming Lin

    (College of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Yufen Zhong

    (College of Rural Revitalization, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

Abstract

Environmental regulation has become a central policy tool for reconciling the tensions between ecological sustainability and industrial development. Although most existing studies focus on its impact on green innovation or firm behavioral change, attention to how environmental regulation affects the structural resilience of manufacturing systems under external shocks remains limited. This paper constructs a balanced panel dataset covering 287 prefecture-level cities in mainland China from 2006 to 2021 to quantify the impact of environmental regulation intensity on the resilience of manufacturing development. Manufacturing resilience is assessed through a comprehensive indicator system, including the dimensions of adaptive capacity, recovery potential, and industrial continuity. The empirical results show that environmental regulation has a significant inhibitory effect on manufacturing resilience, and this effect is supported in a number of robustness analyses using instrumental variable estimation and lagged structural tests. Mechanism analysis suggests that, despite the overall negative effect, environmental regulations can indirectly enhance resilience performance by promoting industrial autonomy and digital transformation under certain conditions. Heterogeneity analysis further reveals that the negative effect is more pronounced in regions with higher regulatory intensity, in non-self-employed firms, in industries not subject to U.S. sanctions, and in eastern China. These findings suggest that the dynamic needs of the industrial system should be taken into account in the formulation of environmental policies, and that digital capacity building and autonomy upgrading should be the key paths to mitigate regulatory shocks.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingyuan Yao & Zheqiu Wang & Kangze Zheng & Qingfan Lin & Weiming Lin & Yufen Zhong, 2025. "Environmental Policy Shocks and Manufacturing Resilience: A Multi-Path Mechanism and Regional Heterogeneity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-31, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5932-:d:1689140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5932/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5932/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ron Martin, 2012. "Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 1-32, January.
    2. Chengliang Wang & Xiaojun Liu & Yang Li, 2024. "Exploring Dynamic Capability Drivers of Green Innovation at Different Digital Transformation Stages: Evidence from Listed Companies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Liang Shen & Runjie Fan & Yuyan Wang & Zhaoqing Yu & Rongyun Tang, 2020. "Impacts of Environmental Regulation on the Green Transformation and Upgrading of Manufacturing Enterprises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Yang Huang & Chau-wa Lau, 2024. "Can digital transformation promote the green innovation quality of enterprises? Empirical evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Mengqi Gong & Zhe You & Linting Wang & Jinhua Cheng, 2020. "Environmental Regulation, Trade Comparative Advantage, and the Manufacturing Industry’s Green Transformation and Upgrading," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Ruomeng Zhou & Yunsheng Zhang & Xincai Gao, 2021. "The Spatial Interaction Effect of Environmental Regulation on Urban Innovation Capacity: Empirical Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Lijiang Jia & Xiaoli Hu & Zhongwei Zhao & Tianze Zhou & Weiming Liu & Bin He & Wei Zhang, 2022. "The Impact of Digitization on Green Innovation Performance: Evidence Based on Panel Data of 228 Prefectural-Level Cities in China," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-13, July.
    8. Xianghua Li & Ying Hu & Xiaodi Guo & Min Wang, 2024. "Government Environmental Information Regulation and Corporate ESG Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-20, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ming Chen & Lina Song & Xiaobo Zhu & Yanshuo Zhu & Chuanhao Liu, 2023. "Does Green Finance Promote the Green Transformation of China’s Manufacturing Industry?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Han Xiao & Cheng Ma & Hongwei Gao & Ye Gao & Yang Xue, 2022. "Green Transformation of Anti-Epidemic Supplies in the Post-Pandemic Era: An Evolutionary Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-26, May.
    3. Chanyuan Liu & Long Xin & Jinye Li & Huaping Sun, 2022. "The Impact of Renewable Energy Technology Innovation on Industrial Green Transformation and Upgrading: Beggar Thy Neighbor or Benefiting Thy Neighbor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    4. Tong Tang & Chun-Ai Ma & Heng-Yu Lv & Fu-Ying Hao, 2023. "The Effect of Corporate Resource Abundance on the Transformation and Upgrading of Manufacturing Enterprises from the Perspective of Whole Process Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-31, July.
    5. Yuxin Meng & Lu Liu & Qiying Ran, 2022. "Can Urban Green Transformation Reduce the Urban–Rural Income Gap? Empirical Evidence Based on Spatial Durbin Model and Mediation Effect Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Xu Dong & Yali Yang & Qinqin Zhuang & Weili Xie & Xiaomeng Zhao, 2022. "Does Environmental Regulation Help Mitigate Factor Misallocation?—Theoretical Simulations Based on a Dynamic General Equilibrium Model and the Perspective of TFP," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Justin Doran & Bernard Fingleton, 2014. "Economic shocks and growth: Spatio-temporal perspectives on Europe's economies in a time of crisis," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93, pages 137-165, November.
    8. Marina Capparucci & Emanuela Ghignoni & Alina Verashchagina & Natalia Vorozhbit, 2015. "The Drivers of Innovation in the Italian Manufacturing Sector," Economia & lavoro, Carocci editore, issue 3, pages 111-128.
    9. Vinko Muštra & Blanka Šimundić & Zvonimir Kuliš, 2020. "Does innovation matter for regional labour resilience? The case of EU regions," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(5), pages 955-970, October.
    10. Nina Hangebruch & Frank Othengrafen, 2022. "Resilient Inner Cities: Conditions and Examples for the Transformation of Former Department Stores in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-25, July.
    11. Tapio Riepponen & Mikko Moilanen & Jaakko Simonen, 2023. "Themes of resilience in the economics literature: A topic modeling approach," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 326-356, April.
    12. Roberto Antonietti & Ron Boschma, 2021. "Social capital, resilience, and regional diversification in Italy [Social capital, innovation and growth: evidence from Europe]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(3), pages 762-777.
    13. Qiang Gao & Zixin Feng & Kuang Li, 2025. "Research on the Impact of Marine New Quality Productive Forces on Marine Economic Resilience: A Case Study of 11 Coastal Provinces and Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-31, May.
    14. repec:osf:osfxxx:s8ayp_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Ugo Fratesi & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2016. "The crisis and regional employment in Europe: what role for sheltered economies?," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 9(1), pages 33-57.
    16. A D Adom, 2016. "Resilience of developing countries to shocks: Case study of WAEMU countries with SUR and VAR Approaches," Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues, vol. 21(2), pages 105-138, September.
    17. Paolo Di Caro, 2015. "Recessions, recoveries and regional resilience: evidence on Italy," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 8(2), pages 273-291.
    18. Vassilis Monastiriotis & Ian R Gordon & Ioannis Laliotis, 2021. "Uneven geographies of economic recovery and the stickiness of individual displacement," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 14(1), pages 157-178.
    19. Mushtaq, Shahbaz & Cockfield, Geoff & White, Neil & Jakeman, Guy, 2014. "Modelling interactions between farm-level structural adjustment and a regional economy: A case of the Australian rice industry," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 34-42.
    20. Xinyu Zhang & Congying Tian, 2024. "Measurement and Influencing Factors of Regional Economic Resilience in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.
    21. Beniamino Pisicoli, 2022. "Banking diversity, financial complexity and resilience to financial shocks: evidence from Italian provinces," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 338-402, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5932-:d:1689140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.