IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i10p6011-d816036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Transformation of Anti-Epidemic Supplies in the Post-Pandemic Era: An Evolutionary Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Han Xiao

    (School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Cheng Ma

    (School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Hongwei Gao

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Ye Gao

    (School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

  • Yang Xue

    (School of Business, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
    The Center for Data Science in Health and Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China)

Abstract

Post-pandemic, the use of medical supplies, such as masks, for epidemic prevention remains high. The explosive growth of medical waste during the COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant environmental problems. To alleviate this, environment-friendly epidemic prevention measures should be developed, used, and promoted. However, contradictions exist between governments, production enterprises, and medical institutions regarding the green transformation of anti-epidemic supplies. Consequently, this study aimed to investigate how to effectively guide the green transformation. Concerning masks, a tripartite evolutionary game model, consisting of governments, mask enterprises, and medical institutions, was established for the supervision of mask production and use, boundary conditions of evolutionary stabilization strategies and government regulations were analyzed, and a dynamic system model was used for the simulation analysis. This analysis revealed that the only tripartite evolutionary stability strategy is for governments to deregulate mask production, enterprises to increase eco-friendly mask production, and medical institutions to use these masks. From the comprehensive analysis, a few important findings are obtained. First, government regulation can promote the green transformation process of anti-epidemic supplies. Government should realize the green transformation of anti-epidemic supplies immediately in order to avoid severe reputation damage. Second, external parameter changes can significantly impact the strategy selection process of all players. Interestingly, it is further found that the cost benefit for using environmentally friendly masks has a great influence on whether green transformation can be achieved. Consequently, the government should establish a favorable marketplace for, and promote the development of, inexpensive, high-quality, and effective environmentally friendly masks in order to achieve the ultimate goal of green transformation of anti-epidemic supplies in the post-pandemic era.

Suggested Citation

  • Han Xiao & Cheng Ma & Hongwei Gao & Ye Gao & Yang Xue, 2022. "Green Transformation of Anti-Epidemic Supplies in the Post-Pandemic Era: An Evolutionary Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-26, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6011-:d:816036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/6011/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/10/6011/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ma, Cheng & Dai, Yuankang & Li, Zhongfei, 2022. "Financing format selection for electronic business platforms with a capital-constrained e-tailer," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Fadi Makki & Anna Lamb & Rouba Moukaddem, 2021. "Plastics and the coronavirus pandemic: a behavioral science perspective," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 20(2), pages 209-213, November.
    3. John Tooby & Leda Cosmides & Michael E. Price, 2006. "Cognitive adaptations for n-person exchange: the evolutionary roots of organizational behavior," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2-3), pages 103-129.
    4. Mengqi Gong & Zhe You & Linting Wang & Jinhua Cheng, 2020. "Environmental Regulation, Trade Comparative Advantage, and the Manufacturing Industry’s Green Transformation and Upgrading," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Seoyong Kim & Jae Eun Lee & Donggeun Kim, 2019. "Searching for the Next New Energy in Energy Transition: Comparing the Impacts of Economic Incentives on Local Acceptance of Fossil Fuels, Renewable, and Nuclear Energies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-32, April.
    6. Wanshu Wu & Kai Zhao & Lei Li, 2021. "Can government subsidy strategies and strategy combinations effectively stimulate enterprise innovation? Theory and evidence," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 38(2), pages 423-446, July.
    7. Elena Scaglione & Gianluigi De Falco & Giuseppe Mantova & Valeria Caturano & Alessia Stornaiuolo & Andrea D’Anna & Paola Salvatore, 2022. "An Experimental Analysis of Five Household Equipment-Based Methods for Decontamination and Reuse of Surgical Masks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-11, March.
    8. Lynn J Frewer & Chaya Howard & Richard Shepherd, 1998. "Understanding public attitudes to technology," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(3), pages 221-235, July.
    9. Lu Huang & Lihua Wang & Zhusheng Liu & Yujie Li, 2021. "Evolutionary game analysis of green industry development in the age of sharing economy," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(27), pages 3065-3079, June.
    10. Tuochen Li & Xinyu Zhou, 2022. "Research on the Mechanism of Government–Industry–University–Institute Collaborative Innovation in Green Technology Based on Game–Based Cellular Automata," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-25, March.
    11. Liang Shen & Runjie Fan & Yuyan Wang & Zhaoqing Yu & Rongyun Tang, 2020. "Impacts of Environmental Regulation on the Green Transformation and Upgrading of Manufacturing Enterprises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Jiayang Xu & Jian Cao & Yunfei Wang & Xiangrong Shi & Jiayun Zeng, 2020. "Evolutionary Game on Government Regulation and Green Supply Chain Decision-Making," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, February.
    13. Bansal, Sangeeta & Gangopadhyay, Shubhashis, 2003. "Tax/subsidy policies in the presence of environmentally aware consumers," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(2, Supple), pages 333-355, March.
    14. Safarzadeh, Soroush & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza, 2019. "A game theoretic approach for pricing policies in a duopolistic supply chain considering energy productivity, industrial rebound effect, and government policies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 92-105.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuxin Meng & Lu Liu & Qiying Ran, 2022. "Can Urban Green Transformation Reduce the Urban–Rural Income Gap? Empirical Evidence Based on Spatial Durbin Model and Mediation Effect Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ming Chen & Lina Song & Xiaobo Zhu & Yanshuo Zhu & Chuanhao Liu, 2023. "Does Green Finance Promote the Green Transformation of China’s Manufacturing Industry?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Jiayang Xu & Jian Cao & Yunfei Wang & Xiangrong Shi & Jiayun Zeng, 2020. "Evolutionary Game on Government Regulation and Green Supply Chain Decision-Making," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, February.
    3. Chanyuan Liu & Long Xin & Jinye Li & Huaping Sun, 2022. "The Impact of Renewable Energy Technology Innovation on Industrial Green Transformation and Upgrading: Beggar Thy Neighbor or Benefiting Thy Neighbor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    4. Genhasi Ge & Daoping Wang & Mesumbe Bianca Epede, 2022. "Pricing Policies of Green Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns and Altruistic Preferences Based on Consumers’ Environmental Awareness and Channel Preference," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-28, October.
    5. Tong Tang & Chun-Ai Ma & Heng-Yu Lv & Fu-Ying Hao, 2023. "The Effect of Corporate Resource Abundance on the Transformation and Upgrading of Manufacturing Enterprises from the Perspective of Whole Process Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-31, July.
    6. Yuxin Meng & Lu Liu & Qiying Ran, 2022. "Can Urban Green Transformation Reduce the Urban–Rural Income Gap? Empirical Evidence Based on Spatial Durbin Model and Mediation Effect Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    7. H. Eggert & M. Greaker, 2011. "Trade, GMOs and Environmental Risk: Are Current Policies Likely to Improve Welfare?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(4), pages 587-608, April.
    8. Visschers, Vivianne H.M. & Siegrist, Michael, 2012. "Fair play in energy policy decisions: Procedural fairness, outcome fairness and acceptance of the decision to rebuild nuclear power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 292-300.
    9. Linghong Zhang & Bowen Xue & Xiyu Liu, 2018. "Carbon Emission Reduction with Regard to Retailer’s Fairness Concern and Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    10. Nicolás Bronfman & Pamela Cisternas & Esperanza López-Vázquez & Luis Cifuentes, 2016. "Trust and risk perception of natural hazards: implications for risk preparedness in Chile," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 81(1), pages 307-327, March.
    11. Maccarrone, Giovanni & Marini, Marco A. & Tarola, Ornella, 2023. "Shop Until You Drop: the Unexpected Effects of Anticonsumerism and Environmentalism," FEEM Working Papers 330384, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    12. Ren, Shenggang & Hu, Yucai & Zheng, Jingjing & Wang, Yangjie, 2020. "Emissions trading and firm innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    13. Juliana Martins Ruzante & Valerie J. Davidson & Julie Caswell & Aamir Fazil & John A. L. Cranfield & Spencer J. Henson & Sven M. Anders & Claudia Schmidt & Jeffrey M. Farber, 2010. "A Multifactorial Risk Prioritization Framework for Foodborne Pathogens," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 724-742, May.
    14. Yi Zheng & Huchang Liao & Xue Yang, 2016. "Stochastic Pricing and Order Model with Transportation Mode Selection for Low-Carbon Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Wen, Wen & Zhou, P. & Zhang, Fuqiang, 2018. "Carbon emissions abatement: Emissions trading vs consumer awareness," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 34-47.
    16. Rongwu Zhang & Wenqiang Fu & Yingxu Kuang, 2022. "Can Digital Economy Promote Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction in Heavily Polluting Enterprises? Empirical Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-21, August.
    17. Yokessa, Maïmouna & Marette, Stéphan, 2019. "A Review of Eco-labels and their Economic Impact," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 13(1-2), pages 119-163, April.
    18. Atonu Rabbani, "undated". "Can Leaders Promote Better Health Behavior? Learning from a Sanitation and Hygiene Communication Experiment in Rural Bangladesh," Working papers 118, The South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics.
    19. Amiri-Pebdani, Sima & Alinaghian, Mahdi & Khosroshahi, Hossein, 2023. "Pricing in competitive energy supply chains considering government interventions to support CCS under cap-and-trade regulations: A game-theoretic approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    20. Visschers, Vivianne H.M. & Keller, Carmen & Siegrist, Michael, 2011. "Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: Investigating an explanatory model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3621-3629, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:10:p:6011-:d:816036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.