IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7794-d1737633.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of Smallholder Irrigation Typology Performance in Limpopo Province: South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Ernest Malatsi

    (Department of Agriculture, Directorate Water Use and Irrigation Development, 20 Steve Biko Street, Arcadia, Pretoria 0001, South Africa)

  • Gugulethu Zuma-Netshiukhwi

    (Agricultural Research Council: Natural Resources and Engineering, 600 Bevedere Street, Arcadia, Pretoria 1000, South Africa)

  • Sue Walker

    (Agricultural Research Council: Natural Resources and Engineering, 600 Bevedere Street, Arcadia, Pretoria 1000, South Africa)

  • Jan Willem Swanepoel

    (Sustainable Food Systems and Development, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa)

Abstract

Smallholder irrigation farmers play a vital role in sustaining rural communities in South Africa. However, the performance of smallholder irrigators, both as income generators and job creators, has come under scrutiny in recent years. In Limpopo province, a study was conducted in the Vhembe District using cross-sectional data from 95 independent and 165 public smallholder irrigators, which are privately established farmers and users of government-supported and managed irrigation systems, respectively. Qualitative data were collected through questionnaires, key informant interviews, and group discussions. Quantitative data were analyzed by SPSS version 30 using themes and codes, employing inferential statistical methods such as chi-square and t -tests to assess variables related to agrifood systems, crop selection, and market access. The study found that smallholders predominantly favor the production of grains, vegetables, and horticultural crops, with a statistically significant ( p < 0.05) similarity between independent and public irrigators. Public irrigators dominate within irrigation schemes at 64% of the total, with X 2 of 22.7 with 0.001 p -value. Amongst the groups, the income distribution shows a statistically significant difference in earnings between independent and public irrigators ( χ 2 = 25.83, p < 0.001). Informal and formal markets are accessible and available to 59% of independent irrigators, but 30% of public irrigators only access the informal market ( p < 0.001). The major identified challenge across all smallholders is the lack of food value addition and commercial packaging. The study recommends the development of food value addition initiatives, adoption of climate-smart practices, maintenance of infrastructure, and improvement of market access to enhance productivity and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ernest Malatsi & Gugulethu Zuma-Netshiukhwi & Sue Walker & Jan Willem Swanepoel, 2025. "An Evaluation of Smallholder Irrigation Typology Performance in Limpopo Province: South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7794-:d:1737633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7794/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7794/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7794-:d:1737633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.