IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7762-d1736702.html

From Innovation to Use: Configurational Pathways to High Fintech Use Across User Groups

Author

Listed:
  • Hyun-Sun Ryu

    (College of Business Management, Hongik University, 2639, Sejong-Ro, Jochiwon-Eup, Sejong City 30016, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Despite high expectations for Fintech growth, its real-world expansion has fallen short due to its inherent complexity. Although Fintech is innovative, its multidimensional nature has made it difficult for companies to develop effective, tailored solutions for its diverse user groups. To foster the development of effective and practical Fintech solutions that can expand the user base, a novel and integrative approach is required. Therefore, this study aims to explore specific solutions to enhance Fintech use by holistically combining and intertwining various attributes. Based on the diffusion of innovation theory and the information systems success model, we propose a conceptual Fintech model consisting of three dimensions: innovation, financial service, and information technology. To investigate this model, we adopt fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), a set-theoretic method suited to identifying combinations of Fintech attributes that lead to specific outcomes. The results reveal that the configurations of Fintech attributes leading to high Fintech use differ across four user groups: Infrequent users, Lurkers, Task-driven users, and Power users. The findings also show that information technology plays multifaceted roles depending on its combination with other Fintech attributes. This study explains the interdependencies among Fintech attributes and their combined effects on Fintech use, offering deeper insights into Fintech research through a configurational lens.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyun-Sun Ryu, 2025. "From Innovation to Use: Configurational Pathways to High Fintech Use Across User Groups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-28, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7762-:d:1736702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7762/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7762/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nalluri, Venkateswarlu & Chen, Long-Sheng, 2024. "Modelling the FinTech adoption barriers in the context of emerging economies—An integrated Fuzzy hybrid approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Huarng, Kun-Huang & Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang, 2022. "Causal complexity analysis for fintech adoption at the country level," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 228-234.
    3. Gatignon, Hubert & Robertson, Thomas S, 1985. "A Propositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 11(4), pages 849-867, March.
    4. Xiang Deng & Zhi Huang & Xiang Cheng, 2019. "FinTech and Sustainable Development: Evidence from China Based on P2P Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Sagir Danladi & M. S. V. Prasad & Umar Muhammad Modibbo & Seyedeh Asra Ahmadi & Peiman Ghasemi, 2023. "Attaining Sustainable Development Goals through Financial Inclusion: Exploring Collaborative Approaches to Fintech Adoption in Developing Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Arts, Joep W.C. & Frambach, Ruud T. & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A., 2011. "Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: A meta-analysis on drivers of intention and behavior," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 134-144.
    7. Hyun-Sun Ryu & Kwang Sun Ko, 2020. "Sustainable Development of Fintech: Focused on Uncertainty and Perceived Quality Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Vicki McKinney & Kanghyun Yoon & Fatemeh “Mariam” Zahedi, 2002. "The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 296-315, September.
    9. Ragin, Charles C., 2006. "Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 291-310, July.
    10. Lee, In & Shin, Yong Jae, 2018. "Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 35-46.
    11. van Oorschot, Johannes A.W.H. & Hofman, Erwin & Halman, Johannes I.M., 2018. "A bibliometric review of the innovation adoption literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1-21.
    12. Bin Gu & Prabhudev Konana & Balaji Rajagopalan & Hsuan-Wei Michelle Chen, 2007. "Competition Among Virtual Communities and User Valuation: The Case of Investing-Related Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 68-85, March.
    13. Vargo, Stephen L. & Akaka, Melissa Archpru & Wieland, Heiko, 2020. "Rethinking the process of diffusion in innovation: A service-ecosystems and institutional perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 526-534.
    14. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Cai, Yulong & Huang, Zhuo & Zhang, Xun, 2024. "FinTech adoption and rural economic development: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberto Moro-Visconti & Salvador Cruz Rambaud & Joaquín López Pascual, 2020. "Sustainability in FinTechs: An Explanation through Business Model Scalability and Market Valuation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Taewoo Roh & Young Soo Yang & Shufeng Xiao & Byung Il Park, 2024. "What makes consumers trust and adopt fintech? An empirical investigation in China," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 3-35, March.
    3. Wenyao Zhang & Qingpu Zhang, 2017. "Exploring Antecedent Difference between Early and Late Adopters of Disruptive Innovation in E-business Microcredit Context: Evidence from China," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 1-29, December.
    4. Alshehri, Abdullah, 2025. "When the recipe is more important than the ingredients, understanding factors affecting customer loyalty in unmanned convenience store using fsQCA," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Gomes, Paulo J. & Silva, Graça Miranda & Sarkis, Joseph, 2020. "Exploring the relationship between quality ambidexterity and sustainable production," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    6. Sharina Tajul Urus & Intan Salwani Mohamed, 2021. "A Flourishing Fintech Ecosystem: Conceptualization and Governing Issues in Malaysia," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(3), pages 106-131, December.
    7. Yingying Zhang-Zhang & Sylvia Rohlfer & Jay Rajasekera, 2020. "An Eco-Systematic View of Cross-Sector Fintech: The Case of Alibaba and Tencent," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Ahmed Razman Latiff & Mohammad Zakaria Alqudah & Husni Samara & Naji Alslaibi, 2025. "Empowering the financial sector: the role of fintech research development trends," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Deutscher, Franziska & Zapkau, Florian B. & Schwens, Christian & Baum, Matthias & Kabst, Ruediger, 2016. "Strategic orientations and performance: A configurational perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 849-861.
    10. Chen, Xiayu & Huang, Qian & Davison, Robert M., 2017. "The role of website quality and social capital in building buyers’ loyalty," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1563-1574.
    11. Iryna Alves & Sofia M. Lourenço, 2023. "An exploratory analysis of incentive packages and managerial performance," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 377-409, September.
    12. Valor, Carmen & Antonetti, Paolo & Crisafulli, Benedetta, 2022. "Emotions and consumers’ adoption of innovations: An integrative review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    13. Algharabat, Raed & Abdallah Alalwan, Ali & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2017. "Three dimensional product presentation quality antecedents and their consequences for online retailers: The moderating role of virtual product experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 203-217.
    14. Gerke, Anna & Luzzini, Davide & Mena, Carlos, 2021. "Innovation configurations in sport clusters: The role of interorganizational citizenship and social capital," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 409-419.
    15. Melissa Archpru Akaka & Hope Jensen Schau & Stephen L Vargo, 2022. "Practice Diffusion [Value Creation in Consumption Journeys: Recursive Reflexivity and Practice Continuity]," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(6), pages 939-969.
    16. Chen, Qian & Jing, Yufan & Gong, Yeming & Tan, Jie, 2025. "Will users fall in love with ChatGPT? a perspective from the triangular theory of love," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    17. Leischnig, Alexander & Kasper-Brauer, Kati & Thornton, Sabrina C., 2020. "Configuring effective client-adviser interactions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 234-240.
    18. Zhen Shao & Lin Zhang & Tian Meng & Jing Zhang, 2024. "The paradox of technology quality and ethical concerns in building trust and behavioral intention in the AI-enabled face recognition payment," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Stefanie Einhorn & Xaver Heinicke & Thomas W. Guenther, 2021. "Management control packages in family businesses: a configurational approach," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(4), pages 433-478, May.
    20. Enkel, Ellen & Wintgens, Sander, 2025. "Understanding mass-market electric vehicle adoption: Integrating diffusion of innovation theory with risk mitigation strategy in Germany," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7762-:d:1736702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.