IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7358-d1724494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Proposed Typology for the Validation of Corporate Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Joan R. Sanchis

    (Department of Business Administration, Universitat de València, ES46022 València, Spain)

  • Vanessa Campos

    (Department of Business Administration, Universitat de València, ES46022 València, Spain)

  • Ana T. Ejarque

    (Department of Business Administration, Universitat de València, ES46022 València, Spain)

Abstract

Corporate sustainability is a multi-stakeholder approach with a Triple or Quadruple Bottom Line focused on long-term horizons and the creation of shared or triple value. The objective of this study is to present a theoretical framework for the implementation and measurement of corporate sustainability within companies and to propose a set of measurement scales for assessing levels of sustainability implementation. This study offers a novel conceptual model that enables the systematic classification and benchmarking of sustainability maturity levels in companies. The methodology involves a literature review and the application of the Dyllick–Muff matrix (2016), which identifies three distinct levels of sustainability: Sustainability 1.0, Sustainability 2.0, and Sustainability 3.0. This framework uses three dimensions: objectives (the “what”), value creation (the “why”), and organizational perspective (the “how”). The study highlights the scarcity of research on the practical implementation of sustainability. Furthermore, there is no widely adopted framework for measuring sustainability implementation. The diversity and fragmentation of existing sustainability measurement models make comparative analysis particularly challenging. This study concludes that the Dyllick–Muff matrix is a suitable tool for determining a company’s level of sustainability and for conducting comparative analyses across organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Joan R. Sanchis & Vanessa Campos & Ana T. Ejarque, 2025. "A Proposed Typology for the Validation of Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7358-:d:1724494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7358/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7358/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7358-:d:1724494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.