IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/futbus/v11y2025i1d10.1186_s43093-025-00539-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic review of ESG indicators and corporate performance: proposal for a conceptual framework

Author

Listed:
  • Ícaro Guilherme Félix Cunha

    (USP – University of São Paulo)

  • Renata Veloso Santos Policarpo

    (USP – University of São Paulo
    Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology Minas Gerais)

  • Paula Cristina Senra Oliveira

    (USP – University of São Paulo)

  • Etienne Cardoso Abdala

    (USP – University of São Paulo
    Federal University of Uberlândia)

  • Daisy Aparecida Nascimento Rebelatto

    (USP – University of São Paulo)

Abstract

Despite the attention given by global stakeholders to transparency and disclosure of nonfinancial corporate information, there is a lack of consensus regarding the disclosure and analysis of corporate results on ESG. The objective of this study is to identify the main environmental, social, and governance (ESG) indicators from the literature and analyze their impact on corporate company performances, as well as a conceptual structure that supports the understanding of these indicators. A systematic literature review was applied to raise and analyze relevant works in the field, following the guidelines of the Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA). We identified and categorized the main indicators for each of the ESG dimensions, as well as the corporate performance (CP) variables impacted by ESG performance, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of their interrelations. Our results indicate that financial performance indicators must be assessed from a long-term perspective, as short-term analyses may show negative relationships with ESG performance. However, for nonfinancial aspects, the relationship with ESG performance is consistently positive across all time horizons. Additionally, we propose a conceptual framework that advances the ESG literature by establishing explicit connections between ESG dimensions and corporate performance variables. This framework categorizes CP into four key areas—financial performance, market and risk perception, strategic positioning, and capital structure—providing a structured approach for evaluating ESG impacts. Our study contributes to both theory and practice, offering insights that support corporate decision-making and sustainability strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ícaro Guilherme Félix Cunha & Renata Veloso Santos Policarpo & Paula Cristina Senra Oliveira & Etienne Cardoso Abdala & Daisy Aparecida Nascimento Rebelatto, 2025. "A systematic review of ESG indicators and corporate performance: proposal for a conceptual framework," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:futbus:v:11:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s43093-025-00539-1
    DOI: 10.1186/s43093-025-00539-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s43093-025-00539-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s43093-025-00539-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandre Sanches Garcia & Renato J. Orsato, 2020. "Testing the institutional difference hypothesis: A study about environmental, social, governance, and financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3261-3272, December.
    2. Mario La Torre & Fabiomassimo Mango & Arturo Cafaro & Sabrina Leo, 2020. "Does the ESG Index Affect Stock Return? Evidence from the Eurostoxx50," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Robert G. Eccles & Mirtha D. Kastrapeli & Stephanie J. Potter, 2017. "How to Integrate ESG into Investment Decision†Making: Results of a Global Survey of Institutional Investors," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 29(4), pages 125-133, December.
    4. Nizam, Esma & Ng, Adam & Dewandaru, Ginanjar & Nagayev, Ruslan & Nkoba, Malik Abdulrahman, 2019. "The impact of social and environmental sustainability on financial performance: A global analysis of the banking sector," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 35-53.
    5. Changhong Zhao & Yu Guo & Jiahai Yuan & Mengya Wu & Daiyu Li & Yiou Zhou & Jiangang Kang, 2018. "ESG and Corporate Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from China’s Listed Power Generation Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Mercedes Alda, 2019. "Corporate sustainability and institutional shareholders: The pressure of social responsible pension funds on environmental firm practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 1060-1071, September.
    7. Alena Kocmanová & Marie Pavláková Dočekalová & Tomáš Meluzín & Stanislav Škapa, 2020. "Sustainable Investing Model for Decision Makers (Based On Research of Manufacturing Industry in the Czech Republic)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-27, October.
    8. Beat Reber & Agnes Gold & Stefan Gold, 2022. "ESG Disclosure and Idiosyncratic Risk in Initial Public Offerings," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 867-886, September.
    9. R. Rajesh & Chandrasekharan Rajendran, 2020. "Relating Environmental, Social, and Governance scores and sustainability performances of firms: An empirical analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1247-1267, March.
    10. Reon Matemane & Tankiso Moloi & Michael Adelowotan, 2022. "Appraising Executive Compensation ESG-Based Indicators Using Analytical Hierarchical Process and Delphi Techniques," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Mirela Cristea & Graţiela Georgiana Noja & Eleftherios Thalassinos & Daniel Cîrciumaru & Constantin Ștefan Ponea & Carmen Claudia Durău, 2022. "Environmental, Social and Governance Credentials of Agricultural Companies—The Interplay with Company Size," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, March.
    12. Diana Marieta Mihaiu & Radu-Alexandru Șerban & Alin Opreana & Mihai Țichindelean & Vasile Brătian & Liliana Barbu, 2021. "The Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions and Sustainability on Company Performance in the Pharmaceutical Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, June.
    13. Jihye Yun & Jonghwa Lee, 2022. "Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate CSR Investment and Business Performance Using ESG Index—The Use-Case of Korean Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Robert G. Eccles & Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2014. "The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2835-2857, November.
    15. Marcel C. Minutolo & Werner D. Kristjanpoller & John Stakeley, 2019. "Exploring environmental, social, and governance disclosure effects on the S&P 500 financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 1083-1095, September.
    16. Massimiliano Cerciello & Francesco Busato & Simone Taddeo, 2023. "The effect of sustainable business practices on profitability. Accounting for strategic disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 802-819, March.
    17. Esmee M. Veenstra & Naomi Ellemers, 2020. "ESG Indicators as Organizational Performance Goals: Do Rating Agencies Encourage a Holistic Approach?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Herenia Gutiérrez-Ponce & Julian Chamizo-González & Nuria Arimany-Serrat, 2022. "Disclosure of Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance Information by Spanish Companies: A Compliance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Jianzhuang Zheng & Muhammad Usman Khurram & Lifeng Chen, 2022. "Can Green Innovation Affect ESG Ratings and Financial Performance? Evidence from Chinese GEM Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-32, July.
    20. Elizabeth Demers & Jurian Hendrikse & Philip Joos & Baruch Lev, 2021. "ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3-4), pages 433-462, March.
    21. R. Edward Freeman, 2010. "Managing for Stakeholders: Trade-offs or Value Creation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 7-9, August.
    22. Fabrizio Ferriani & Filippo Natoli, 2021. "ESG risks in times of Covid-19," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(18), pages 1537-1541, October.
    23. Elisa Baraibar‐Diez & María D. Odriozola & José Luis Fernández Sánchez, 2019. "Sustainable compensation policies and its effect on environmental, social, and governance scores," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1457-1472, November.
    24. Vasile Dedu & Dan-Costin Nițescu & Maria-Alexandra Cristea, 2021. "The Impact of Macroeconomic, Social and Governance Factors on the Sustainability and Well-Being of the Economic Environment and the Robustness of the Banking System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    25. Amal Aouadi & Sylvain Marsat, 2018. "Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data," Post-Print halshs-02007374, HAL.
    26. Silvana Signori & Leire San-Jose & Jose Luis Retolaza & Gianfranco Rusconi, 2021. "Stakeholder Value Creation: Comparing ESG and Value Added in European Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    27. Amal Aouadi & Sylvain Marsat, 2018. "Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 1027-1047, September.
    28. Souhir Khemir, 2019. "Perception of ESG criteria by mainstream investors: evidence from Tunisia," International Journal of Emerging Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(5), pages 752-768, February.
    29. Hai-Yen Chang & Lien-Wen Liang & Yu-Luan Liu, 2021. "Using Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) and Financial Indicators to Measure Bank Cost Efficiency in Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-20, October.
    30. Rajesh, R. & Rajeev, A. & Rajendran, Chandrasekharan, 2022. "Corporate social performances of firms in select developed economies: A comparative study," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    31. Gaur, Ajai & Kumar, Mukesh, 2018. "A systematic approach to conducting review studies: An assessment of content analysis in 25years of IB research," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 280-289.
    32. Nikunj Sachin & R. Rajesh, 2022. "An empirical study of supply chain sustainability with financial performances of Indian firms," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 6577-6601, May.
    33. Mozaffar Khan, 2019. "Corporate Governance, ESG, and Stock Returns around the World," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(4), pages 103-123, October.
    34. repec:eme:ijoes0:ijoes-09-2018-0130 is not listed on IDEAS
    35. Ersan Ersoy & Beata Swiecka & Simon Grima & Ercan Özen & Inna Romanova, 2022. "The Impact of ESG Scores on Bank Market Value? Evidence from the U.S. Banking Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    36. Sang Kim & Zhichuan (Frank) Li, 2021. "Understanding the Impact of ESG Practices in Corporate Finance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, March.
    37. Caterina De Lucia & Pasquale Pazienza & Mark Bartlett, 2020. "Does Good ESG Lead to Better Financial Performances by Firms? Machine Learning and Logistic Regression Models of Public Enterprises in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-29, July.
    38. Ali Alshehhi & Haitham Nobanee & Nilesh Khare, 2018. "The Impact of Sustainability Practices on Corporate Financial Performance: Literature Trends and Future Research Potential," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-25, February.
    39. Leonardo Becchetti & Emanuele Bobbio & Federico Prizia & Lorenzo Semplici, 2022. "Going Deeper into the S of ESG: A Relational Approach to the Definition of Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, August.
    40. Sonali Bhattacharya & Dipasha Sharma, 2019. "Do environment, social and governance performance impact credit ratings: a study from India," International Journal of Ethics and Systems, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(3), pages 466-484, June.
    41. Suli Hao & Chongbao Ren & Lu Zhang, 2022. "Research on Performance Evaluation of Coal Enterprises Based on Grounded Theory, Entropy Method and Cloud Model from the Perspective of ESG," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-54, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radu-Alexandru Șerban & Diana Marieta Mihaiu & Mihai Țichindelean, 2022. "Environment, Social, and Governance Score and Value Added Impacts on Market Capitalization: A Sectoral-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Khan, Muhammad Arif, 2022. "ESG disclosure and Firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    3. Rodrigo Zeidan, 2022. "Why don't asset managers accelerate ESG investing? A sentiment analysis based on 13,000 messages from finance professionals," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3028-3039, November.
    4. Barbosa, Anrafel de Souza & Crispim, Maria Cristina & da Silva, Luiz Bueno & da Silva, Jonhatan Magno Norte & Barbosa, Aglaucibelly Maciel & Correia, Lucas Miguel Alencar de Morais & Morioka, Sandra N, 2025. "Empirical analysis of workers' perceptions of ESG impacts on corporate sustainability performance: A methodological innovation combining the PLS-SEM, PROMETHEE-ROC and FIMIX-PLS methods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    5. Lei Ruan & Heng Liu, 2021. "Environmental, Social, Governance Activities and Firm Performance: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Massimiliano Cerciello & Francesco Busato & Simone Taddeo, 2023. "The effect of sustainable business practices on profitability. Accounting for strategic disclosure," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 802-819, March.
    7. Charl de Villiers & Jing Jia & Zhongtian Li, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility: A review of empirical research using Thomson Reuters Asset4 data," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(4), pages 4523-4568, December.
    8. Marie, Mohamed & Qi, Baolei & Elgammal, Mohammed & Elnahass, Marwa, 2024. "A more sustainable future: Can politically connected CEOs spur the nexus between ESG performance and firm financial performance?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    9. Maya Finger & Mosi Rosenboim, 2022. "Going ESG: The Economic Value of Adopting an ESG Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Alan Kai Ming Au & Yi-Fan Yang & Huan Wang & Rui-Hong Chen & Leven J. Zheng, 2023. "Mapping the Landscape of ESG Strategies: A Bibliometric Review and Recommendations for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-26, December.
    11. Jingwen Xia, 2022. "A Systematic Review: How Does Organisational Learning Enable ESG Performance (from 2001 to 2021)?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Wu, Zihao & Gao, Jun & Luo, Chengdi & Xu, Hui & Shi, Guanqun, 2024. "How does boardroom diversity influence the relationship between ESG and firm financial performance?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PB), pages 713-730.
    13. Muneer Shaik & Mohd Ziaur Rehman, 2023. "The Dynamic Volatility Connectedness of Major Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Stock Indices: Evidence Based on DCC-GARCH Model," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 30(1), pages 231-246, March.
    14. Alberto Barroso del Toro & Laura Vivas Crisol & Xavier Tort-Martorell, 2022. "Comparing the Impacts of Sustainability Narratives on American and European Energy Shareholders: A Multi-Event Study Analysing Reactions to News before and during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Matanle, Peter & Li, Yang & Fakharuzi, Zhamayne & Shin, Yejin & Bradley, Jonathan & McCafferty, Jim, 2025. "Learning from Japan by Avoiding its Mistakes! Assessing the ‘S’ in ESG and its Impact on Financial Performance in Large South Korean Corporations," OSF Preprints jk9hp_v1, Center for Open Science.
    16. Jiunan Ji & Junrui Zhang & Wen Qu, 2025. "Research on the Influence Mechanism of Environment Social Government Performance in State-Owned Enterprise Value: The Role of Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-18, January.
    17. Ersan Ersoy & Beata Swiecka & Simon Grima & Ercan Özen & Inna Romanova, 2022. "The Impact of ESG Scores on Bank Market Value? Evidence from the U.S. Banking Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, August.
    18. Shakil, Mohammad Hassan, 2021. "Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Simona Galletta & Sebastiano Mazzù & Valeria Naciti, 2021. "Banks' business strategy and environmental effectiveness: The monitoring role of the board of directors and the managerial incentives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2656-2670, July.
    20. Patel, Pankaj C. & Pearce, John A. & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2021. "Not so myopic: Investors lowering short-term growth expectations under high industry ESG-sales-related dynamism and predictability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 551-563.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:futbus:v:11:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s43093-025-00539-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.