IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6991-d1715179.html

Factors Influencing Willingness to Collaborate on Water Management: Insights from Grape Farming in Samarkand, Uzbekistan

Author

Listed:
  • Sodikjon Avazalievich Mamasoliev

    (Department of Symbiotic Science of Environment and Natural Resources, United Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwai, Fuchu, Tokyo 183-8509, Japan)

  • Motoi Kusadokoro

    (Division of Studies in Sustainable and Symbiotic Society, Institute of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwai, Fuchu, Tokyo 183-8509, Japan)

  • Takeshi Maru

    (Division of International Environmental and Agricultural Science, Institute of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwai, Fuchu, Tokyo 183-8509, Japan)

  • Shavkat Hasanov

    (Department of Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Management, Samarkand Agroinnovations and Research University, 7 Amir Temur, Dahbet Town, Okdarya District, Samarkand 141001, Uzbekistan)

  • Yoshiko Kawabata

    (Division of International Environmental and Agricultural Science, Institute of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwai, Fuchu, Tokyo 183-8509, Japan)

Abstract

Water is essential for ecological balance, environmental sustainability, and food security, particularly in arid regions where effective water management increasingly depends on farmer cooperation. The Samarkand region of Uzbekistan, known for its favorable climate and leading role in grape production, is facing rising drought conditions. This study explores the factors influencing grape farmers’ willingness to collaborate on water management in the districts of Ishtikhan, Payarik, and Kushrabot, which together produce 75–80% of the region’s grapes. A quantitative survey of 384 grape-producing households was conducted across 19 county citizens’ gatherings (38.7% of such gatherings), and structural equation modeling was employed to analyze a framework consisting of four dimensions: norms, environmental concerns, economic barriers, and the intention to adopt sustainable practices. The results indicate that norms and environmental concerns positively influence collaboration, suggesting a collective orientation toward sustainability. In contrast, economic barriers such as high costs and limited financial capacity significantly hinder cooperative behavior. Furthermore, a strong individual intention to adopt sustainable practices was associated with a greater likelihood of collaboration. These findings highlight the critical drivers and constraints shaping collective water use in agriculture and suggest that targeted policy measures and community-led efforts are vital for promoting sustainable water governance in drought-prone regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sodikjon Avazalievich Mamasoliev & Motoi Kusadokoro & Takeshi Maru & Shavkat Hasanov & Yoshiko Kawabata, 2025. "Factors Influencing Willingness to Collaborate on Water Management: Insights from Grape Farming in Samarkand, Uzbekistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6991-:d:1715179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6991/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6991/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José Antonio Peña-Ramos & Philipp Bagus & Daria Fursova, 2021. "Water Conflicts in Central Asia: Some Recommendations on the Non-Conflictual Use of Water," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Anna‐Katharina Hornidge & Lisa Oberkircher & Bernhard Tischbein & Gunther Schorcht & Anik Bhaduri & Ahmad M. Manschadi, 2011. "Reconceptualizing water management in Khorezm, Uzbekistan," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 35, pages 251-268, November.
    3. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    4. Hamidov, A. & Kasymov, U. & Djumaboev, Kakhramon & Paul, C., 2022. "Rebound effects in irrigated agriculture in Uzbekistan: a stakeholder-based assessment," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 1-14(14):83.
    5. Elinor Ostrom, 2000. "Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 137-158, Summer.
    6. Max Spoor, 1998. "The Aral Sea Basin Crisis: Transition and Environment in Former Soviet Central Asia," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 29(3), pages 409-435, July.
    7. Hoogesteger, Jaime & Wester, Philippus, 2017. "Regulating groundwater use: The challenges of policy implementation in Guanajuato, Central Mexico," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 107-113.
    8. Ahmad Hamidov & Ulan Kasymov & Kakhramon Djumaboev & Carsten Paul, 2022. "Rebound Effects in Irrigated Agriculture in Uzbekistan: A Stakeholder-Based Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Anna‐Katharina Hornidge & Lisa Oberkircher & Bernhard Tischbein & Gunther Schorcht & Anik Bhaduri & Ahmad M. Manschadi, 2011. "Reconceptualizing water management in Khorezm, Uzbekistan," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 35(4), pages 251-268, November.
    10. Hanjra, Munir A. & Qureshi, M. Ejaz, 2010. "Global water crisis and future food security in an era of climate change," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 365-377, October.
    11. Sharifzadeh, Maryam & Golabvand, Sanaz & Afereydouni, Maryam, 2024. "Sustainable water management in wheat farming: Insights from diverse water environments," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    12. Laurence Amblard & Nadia Guiffant & Claire Bussière, 2023. "The drivers of farmers' participation in collaborative water management: a french perspective," Post-Print hal-04342311, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Savari, Moslem & Ghezi, Mohammadamin & Molavi, Homa, 2025. "Social capital and behavioral response to water scarcity: Sustainable agriculture policies pathways for adopting dry direct-seeded rice," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    2. Giefer, Madeline M. & An, Li & Chen, Xiaodong, 2021. "Normative, livelihood, and demographic influences on enrollment in a payment for ecosystem services program," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Rustamova, Iroda & Primov, Abdulla & Karimov, Aziz & Khaitov, Botir & Karimov, Akmal, 2023. "Crop Diversification in the Aral Sea Region: Long-Term Situation Analysis," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(13).
    4. Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss & Corbera, Esteve & Lapeyre, Renaud, 2019. "Payments for Environmental Services and Motivation Crowding: Towards a Conceptual Framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 434-443.
    5. Karimov, Akmal Kh. & Šimůnek, Jirka & Hanjra, Munir A. & Avliyakulov, Mirzaolim & Forkutsa, Irina, 2014. "Effects of the shallow water table on water use of winter wheat and ecosystem health: Implications for unlocking the potential of groundwater in the Fergana Valley (Central Asia)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 57-69.
    6. Jessica Müller & Ángel Acevedo-Duque & Sheyla Müller & Prateek Kalia & Khalid Mehmood, 2021. "Predictive Sustainability Model Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior Incorporating Ecological Conscience and Moral Obligation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Michal Krawczyk & Joanna Tyrowicz & Wojciech Hardy, 2020. "Online and physical appropriation: evidence from a vignette experiment on copyright infringement," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 481-496, April.
    8. Tang, Xiaoyu & Huang, Yue & Pan, Xiaohui & Liu, Tie & Ling, Yunan & Peng, Jiabin, 2024. "Managing the water-agriculture-environment-energy nexus: Trade-offs and synergies in an arid area of Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    9. Kaitlyn Height & Sonia Graham, 2026. "Social norms enable rural collective action: an example from weed management in Australia," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 43(1), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Ghanian, Mansour & M. Ghoochani, Omid & Dehghanpour, Mojtaba & Taqipour, Milad & Taheri, Fatemeh & Cotton, Matthew, 2020. "Understanding farmers’ climate adaptation intention in Iran: A protection-motivation extended model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    11. Janis L Dickinson & Poppy McLeod & Robert Bloomfield & Shorna Allred, 2016. "Which Moral Foundations Predict Willingness to Make Lifestyle Changes to Avert Climate Change in the USA?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-11, October.
    12. Morris, Michael W. & Hong, Ying-yi & Chiu, Chi-yue & Liu, Zhi, 2015. "Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1-13.
    13. David Hirschfeld & Marcus Wagner, 2022. "The Interplay of Attitudes, Norms and Control in Sustainable Entrepreneurship: An Experimental Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.
    14. John M. Kerr & Maria K. Lapinski & Rain Wuyu Liu & Jinhua Zhao, 2017. "Long-Term Effects of Payments for Environmental Services: Combining Insights from Communication and Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    15. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    16. Tran Huy Phuong & Thanh Trung Hieu, 2015. "Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Undergraduate Students in Vietnam: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 46-55, August.
    17. Clara Cardone-Riportella & María José Casasola-Martinez & Isabel Feito-Ruiz, 2014. "Do Entrepreneurs Come From Venus Or Mars? Impact Of Postgraduate Studies: Gender And Family Business Background," Working Papers 14.04, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Financial Economics and Accounting (former Department of Business Administration), revised Sep 2014.
    18. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 0. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    19. Ruijie Zhu & Guojing Zhao & Zehai Long & Yangjie Huang & Zhaoxin Huang, 2022. "Entrepreneurship or Employment? A Survey of College Students’ Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    20. Alsalem, Amani & Fry, Marie-Louise & Thaichon, Park, 2020. "To donate or to waste it: Understanding posthumous organ donation attitude," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 87-97.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6991-:d:1715179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.