IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6612-d1705517.html

How Does Urban Compactness Affect Green Total Factor Productivity? An Empirical Study of Urban Agglomerations in Southwest China

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Chen

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yike Zhang

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jiahe Wang

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Binbin Wu

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Yaoning Yang

    (School of Architecture and Planning, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China)

Abstract

With the development of urban scale and economic growth, the challenges posed by limited resources and insufficient environmental carrying capacity become increasingly severe, making the sustainable improvement of production efficiency an urgent requirement. Based on panel data for cities in the Dianzhong Urban Agglomeration and the Chengdu–Chongqing Economic Circle in Southwest China (2012–2021), this study elucidates the positive effect of urban compactness on green total factor productivity (GTFP). By constructing a composite index to measure urban compactness and employing an SBM model to quantify GTFP, we find that a 1% increase in urban compactness leads to a 0.65% increase in GTFP. A mediating-effect analysis reveals that green technological innovation serves as a significant mediator, with a mediating effect value of 0.363. Heterogeneity analysis uncovers differing mechanisms of influence: urban compactness exerts a positive effect in regions with higher levels of economic development, while its impact is not significant in regions with lower economic development, indicating that the effect of compactness varies with economic context; the impact of urban compactness on GTFP is statistically insignificant in regions with higher tertiary sector shares ( p > 0.1), whereas it exhibits a highly significant positive effect in regions with lower tertiary sector presence (β = 1.49, p < 0.01). These results collectively demonstrate that the influence of urban compactness on GTFP varies significantly with industrial structure composition. Threshold-effect analysis further shows that there is a threshold in the proportion of industrial output value, beyond which the influence of compactness on GTFP becomes even stronger. Our research quantitatively explores both linear and nonlinear relationships between urban compactness and GTFP, clarifying the linkage between urban spatial dynamics and green production efficiency, and provides empirical evidence and scholarly support for urban planning and economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Chen & Yike Zhang & Jiahe Wang & Binbin Wu & Yaoning Yang, 2025. "How Does Urban Compactness Affect Green Total Factor Productivity? An Empirical Study of Urban Agglomerations in Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-32, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6612-:d:1705517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6612/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6612/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walheer, Barnabé, 2018. "Disaggregation of the cost Malmquist productivity index with joint and output-specific inputs," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Larondelle, Neele & Lauf, Steffen, 2016. "Balancing demand and supply of multiple urban ecosystem services on different spatial scales," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PA), pages 18-31.
    3. Yang Liu & Yanlin Yang & Huihui Li & Kaiyang Zhong, 2022. "Digital Economy Development, Industrial Structure Upgrading and Green Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China’s Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Shengyan Xu & Miao Liu & Ping Hua & Yibo Chen, 2024. "How Has Land Restriction Policy Influenced Green Total Factor Productivity? Evidence from Chinese Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Han, J.Y., 2010. "Total factor carbon emission performance: A Malmquist index analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 194-201, January.
    6. Färe, Rolf & Grosskopf, Shawna & Pasurka, Carl A., 2007. "Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1055-1066.
    7. Wang, Yafei & Bai, Ying & Quan, Tianshu & Ran, Rong & Hua, Lei, 2023. "Influence and effect of industrial agglomeration on urban green total factor productivity—On the regulatory role of innovation agglomeration and institutional distance," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1158-1173.
    8. Zhijun Li & Yuanyuan Shi & Michal Wojewodzki & Yigang Wei & Meiyu Guo, 2024. "The Impact of New-Type Urbanization Policy on Urban Green Total Factor Productivity: New Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Faisal Bin Sulaiman, 2023. "Compact City: What Is the Extent of Our Exploration for Its Meanings? A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sai, Rockson & Yuan, Hongping & Kwabena Takyi, Ebenezer & Abudu, Hermas & Agyeman, Stephen, 2025. "Evaluation of transport carbon efficiency, reduction potential, and influencing factors in Africa," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 65-83.
    2. Zhang, Bin & Lu, Danting & He, Yan & Chiu, Yung-ho, 2018. "The efficiencies of resource-saving and environment: A case study based on Chinese cities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 493-507.
    3. Juan Du & Yongrui Duan & Jinghua Xu, 2019. "The infeasible problem of Malmquist–Luenberger index and its application on China’s environmental total factor productivity," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 278(1), pages 235-253, July.
    4. Chen, Weidong & Geng, Wenxin, 2017. "Fossil energy saving and CO2 emissions reduction performance, and dynamic change in performance considering renewable energy input," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 283-292.
    5. Lin, Boqiang & Sai, Rockson, 2021. "A multi factor Malmquist CO2emission performance indices: Evidence from Sub Saharan African public thermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    6. Guangyao Deng & Jiao Qian, 2025. "How Does the Pilot Information Consumption Policy Affect Urban Carbon Productivity? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from 275 Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-24, May.
    7. Dong-hyun Oh, 2010. "A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 183-197, December.
    8. Long, Xingle & Zhao, Xicang & Cheng, Faxin, 2015. "The comparison analysis of total factor productivity and eco-efficiency in China's cement manufactures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 61-66.
    9. Li, Aijun & Zhang, Aizhen & Huang, Huijie & Yao, Xin, 2018. "Measuring unified efficiency of fossil fuel power plants across provinces in China: An analysis based on non-radial directional distance functions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 549-561.
    10. Riccardi, R. & Oggioni, G. & Toninelli, R., 2012. "Efficiency analysis of world cement industry in presence of undesirable output: Application of data envelopment analysis and directional distance function," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 140-152.
    11. Wang, Qunwei & Su, Bin & Sun, Jiasen & Zhou, Peng & Zhou, Dequn, 2015. "Measurement and decomposition of energy-saving and emissions reduction performance in Chinese cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 85-92.
    12. Chung, Yeimin & Heshmati, Almas, 2013. "Measurement of Environmentally Sensitive Productivity Growth in Korean Industries," IZA Discussion Papers 7235, IZA Network @ LISER.
    13. Xiaohong Liu & Jiasen Sun, 2025. "Analysis of China’s regional energy efficiency based on DEA considering integer constraint," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(12), pages 28495-28512, December.
    14. Zhang, Ning & Choi, Yongrok, 2013. "A comparative study of dynamic changes in CO2 emission performance of fossil fuel power plants in China and Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 324-332.
    15. Lin, Boqiang & Du, Kerui, 2015. "Energy and CO2 emissions performance in China's regional economies: Do market-oriented reforms matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 113-124.
    16. Zhou, P. & Delmas, M.A. & Kohli, A., 2017. "Constructing meaningful environmental indices: A nonparametric frontier approach," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 21-34.
    17. Li, Hongmei & Xu, Ruizhe, 2023. "How does digital finance affect the efficiency of urban green economies? Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PD).
    18. Oh, Dong-hyun & Heshmati, Almas, 2010. "A sequential Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index: Environmentally sensitive productivity growth considering the progressive nature of technology," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1345-1355, November.
    19. Lena, Daniela & Pasurka, Carl A. & Cucculelli, Marco, 2022. "Environmental regulation and green productivity growth: Evidence from Italian manufacturing industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    20. Yang, Zhenbing & Fan, Meiting & Shao, Shuai & Yang, Lili, 2017. "Does carbon intensity constraint policy improve industrial green production performance in China? A quasi-DID analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 271-282.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6612-:d:1705517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.