IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5951-d1689811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managerial Mastery or Mere Misperception? Exploring the Dunning–Kruger Effect in Agricultural Businesses

Author

Listed:
  • Mpumelelo Longweni

    (WorkWell Research Unit, School of Management Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South Africa)

  • Aloe Meintjes

    (WorkWell Research Unit, School of Management Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South Africa)

Abstract

Misplaced confidence disguised as competence can lead to broad business blunders. The Dunning–Kruger effect (DKE) is an infamous illusory superiority cognitive bias in which people who perform poorly in certain skills erroneously perceive their task execution as superior to the performance of others. Although it is a metacognitive phenomenon with implications for various domains, it is yet to be directly investigated with managers. The purpose of this study is to bridge the research gap by qualitatively exploring the DKE’s manifestation among managers through 20 semi-structured interviews in agricultural businesses. We found that the DKE manifests at all levels of management; however, it seems that lower-level managers are more susceptible to this cognitive bias. We also present a conceptual framework that highlights the various antecedents and consequences of the DKE, based on our content analysis. This study presents a novel domain affected by the DKE, which was discovered by an unconventional methodological approach. Through the recommendations made, the study also contributes to the SDGs and sustainable leadership and management in agricultural businesses.

Suggested Citation

  • Mpumelelo Longweni & Aloe Meintjes, 2025. "Managerial Mastery or Mere Misperception? Exploring the Dunning–Kruger Effect in Agricultural Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-35, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5951-:d:1689811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5951/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5951/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krajc, Marian & Ortmann, Andreas, 2008. "Are the unskilled really that unaware? An alternative explanation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 724-738, November.
    2. Shu, Rui & Ren, Shenggang & Zheng, Yi, 2018. "Building networks into discovery: The link between entrepreneur network capability and entrepreneurial opportunity discovery," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 197-208.
    3. Dean Tjosvold, 1998. "Using and Valuing Accounting Information: Joint Decision Making Between Accountants and Retail Managers," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 327-345, July.
    4. Ehrlinger, Joyce & Johnson, Kerri & Banner, Matthew & Dunning, David & Kruger, Justin, 2008. "Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 98-121, January.
    5. Jin-Hee Jin & Jin-Seok Han, 2025. "A Phenomenological Study on the Experience of Searching for Tourism Information Following the Emergence of ChatGPT: Focused on the Uncanny Valley Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Pratt, Stephen & Pan, Bing & Agyeiwaah, Elizabeth & Lei, Soey Sut Ieng & Lugosi, Peter & Kirillova, Ksenia & Piirman, Marit & Lockwood Sutton, Jonathan & Jönsson, H. Cristina & Haselwanter, Stefanie &, 2024. "Tourism myths and the Dunning Kruger effect," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    7. Mahir Pradana & Hanifah Putri Elisa & Dian Gita Utami, 2023. "Mental health and entrepreneurship: A bibliometric study and literature review," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 2224911-222, December.
    8. Jeffery W. Bentley & Diego Naziri & Gordon Prain & Enoch Kikulwe & Sarah Mayanja & André Devaux & Graham Thiele, 2021. "Managing complexity and uncertainty in agricultural innovation through adaptive project design and implementation," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 198-213, February.
    9. Marian Krajc, 2008. "Are the Unskilled Really That Unaware? Understanding Seemingly Biased Self-Assessments," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp373, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    10. Heungsik Park & Brita Bjørkelo & John Blenkinsopp, 2020. "External Whistleblowers’ Experiences of Workplace Bullying by Superiors and Colleagues," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 591-601, January.
    11. Ivan Uher & Ján Pivovarník & Mária Majherová & Erika Chovanová, 2022. "Benefits of Interoceptive Awareness: A Correlational Study of the Distinct Sport Education Program among Slovak University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-12, January.
    12. Gignac, Gilles E. & Zajenkowski, Marcin, 2020. "The Dunning-Kruger effect is (mostly) a statistical artefact: Valid approaches to testing the hypothesis with individual differences data," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dunkel, Curtis S. & Nedelec, Joseph & van der Linden, Dimitri, 2023. "Reevaluating the Dunning-Kruger effect: A response to and replication of Gignac and Zajenkowski (2020)," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    2. Jan R. Magnus & Anatoly A. Peresetsky, 2021. "A statistical explanation of the Dunning-Kruger effect," Working Papers w0286, New Economic School (NES).
    3. Adamecz, Anna & Ilieva, Radina & Shure, Nikki, 2025. "Revisiting the Dunning-Kruger effect: Composite measures and heterogeneity by gender," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    4. Feld, Jan & Sauermann, Jan & de Grip, Andries, 2017. "Estimating the relationship between skill and overconfidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 18-24.
    5. Brookins, Philip & Lucas, Adriana & Ryvkin, Dmitry, 2014. "Reducing within-group overconfidence through group identity and between-group confidence judgments," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-12.
    6. Meeran, Sheik & Goodwin, Paul & Yalabik, Baris, 2016. "A parsimonious explanation of observed biases when forecasting one’s own performance," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 112-120.
    7. Ryvkin, Dmitry & Krajč, Marian & Ortmann, Andreas, 2012. "Are the unskilled doomed to remain unaware?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 1012-1031.
    8. Bhatt, Vipul & Smith, Angela M., 2025. "Overconfidence and performance: Evidence from a simple real-effort task," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    9. Marian Krajc, 2008. "Are the Unskilled Really That Unaware? Understanding Seemingly Biased Self-Assessments," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp373, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    10. Schlösser, Thomas & Dunning, David & Johnson, Kerri L. & Kruger, Justin, 2013. "How unaware are the unskilled? Empirical tests of the “signal extraction” counterexplanation for the Dunning–Kruger effect in self-evaluation of performance," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 85-100.
    11. Gignac, Gilles E. & Zajenkowski, Marcin, 2020. "The Dunning-Kruger effect is (mostly) a statistical artefact: Valid approaches to testing the hypothesis with individual differences data," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    12. Krawczyk, Michał & Wilamowski, Maciej, 2019. "Task difficulty and overconfidence. Evidence from distance running," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 75(PB).
    13. Sawler, James, 2021. "Economics 101-ism and the Dunning-Kruger effect: Reducing overconfidence among introductory macroeconomics students," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    14. Pallavi Kompella & Brant Gracia & Lucy LeBlanc & Shelly Engelman & Chinmayee Kulkarni & Niral Desai & Viviana June & Stephen March & Sarah Pattengale & Gabriel Rodriguez-Rivera & Seung Woo Ryu & Isabe, 2020. "Interactive youth science workshops benefit student participants and graduate student mentors," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-10, March.
    15. Murad, Zahra & Starmer, Chris, 2021. "Confidence snowballing and relative performance feedback," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 550-572.
    16. Feld, Jan & Sauermann, Jan & de Grip, Andries, 2017. "Estimating the relationship between skill and overconfidence," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 18-24.
    17. Gary Kleinman & Dan Palmon, 2000. "A Negotiation-Oriented Model of Auditor-Client Relationships," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 17-45, January.
    18. Asante, Eric Adom & Affum-Osei, Emmanuel, 2019. "Entrepreneurship as a career choice: The impact of locus of control on aspiring entrepreneurs' opportunity recognition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 227-235.
    19. Rohit Aggarwal & David Kryscynski & Harpreet Singh, 2015. "Evaluating Venture Technical Competence in Venture Capitalist Investment Decisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(11), pages 2685-2706, November.
    20. Good, Megan C. & Schwepker, Charles H., 2022. "Business-to-business salespeople and political skill: Relationship building, deviance, and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 32-43.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5951-:d:1689811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.