IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i18p8108-d1479612.html

Enhancing Government Services to Rice Farmers in the Philippines: A Service Quality–Sustainability-Focused Approach for Long-Term Agricultural Resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Jenel Ituriaga

    (School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapua University, Manila 1002, Philippines
    School of Graduate Studies, Mapua University, Manila 1002, Philippines
    Department of Industrial Engineering, Occidental Mindoro State College, Labangan, San Jose 5100, Philippines)

  • Klint Allen Mariñas

    (School of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapua University, Manila 1002, Philippines
    School of Graduate Studies, Mapua University, Manila 1002, Philippines)

  • Charmine Sheena Saflor

    (Department of Industrial Systems Engineering, De La Salle University, Manila 1004, Philippines)

Abstract

In the Philippines, where agriculture plays a vital role in the economy, nearly half of the country’s 30 million hectares of land is used for agricultural purposes. Despite government efforts to support rice farmers, challenges, such as production failures and profit losses, remain prevalent. This study evaluates the quality of government services provided to rice farmers through a service quality-based framework (SERVQUAL), assessing five key dimensions: assurance (AS), empathy (EM), reliability (RL), responsiveness (RS), and tangibility (TA). Structural equation modeling (SEM) is employed to examine the relationships among these service quality dimensions and other latent variables, including service quality (SQ), farmers’ satisfaction (FS), farmers’ trust (FT), perceived security (PS), and perceived effectiveness (PE). Data were gathered from 400 respondents using a 55-item survey. The findings indicate that perceived security (PS) is the most critical factor in enhancing the overall quality of government services. The study emphasizes the importance of adopting a SERVQUAL-based approach, with a focus on reliability and responsiveness to improve farmers’ satisfaction and trust. Additionally, fostering trust between farmers and the government is crucial to increasing the effectiveness of government programs and strengthening farmer–government collaboration. The study further advocates for prioritizing sustainable agricultural practices to ensure long-term productivity and environmental resilience. By improving service quality with a focus on sustainability, the Philippines can work towards achieving broader sustainable development goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenel Ituriaga & Klint Allen Mariñas & Charmine Sheena Saflor, 2024. "Enhancing Government Services to Rice Farmers in the Philippines: A Service Quality–Sustainability-Focused Approach for Long-Term Agricultural Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8108-:d:1479612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/8108/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/18/8108/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prentice, Catherine & Nguyen, Mai, 2020. "Engaging and retaining customers with AI and employee service," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    2. Bashir Ahmad Fida & Umar Ahmed & Yousuf Al-Balushi & Dharmendra Singh, 2020. "Impact of Service Quality on Customer Loyalty and Customer Satisfaction in Islamic Banks in the Sultanate of Oman," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    3. Anderson, Kym, 2009. "Five Decades of Distortions to Agricultural Incentives," Agricultural Distortions Working Paper Series 48742, World Bank.
    4. Yao, Di & Xu, Liqun & Zhang, Chunqin & Li, Jinpei, 2021. "Revisiting the interactions between bus service quality, car ownership and mode use: A case study in Changzhou, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 329-344.
    5. Sanghoon Lee & Eunil Park & Sang Jib Kwon & Angel P. Del Pobil, 2015. "Antecedents of Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Telecommunication Services: Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Technology Acceptance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Kassem, Hazem S. & Alotaibi, Bader Alhafi & Muddassir, Muhammad & Herab, Ahmed, 2021. "Factors influencing farmers’ satisfaction with the quality of agricultural extension services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    7. Yuhan Ge & Qing Yuan & Yaxi Wang & Keunsoo Park, 2021. "The Structural Relationship among Perceived Service Quality, Perceived Value, and Customer Satisfaction-Focused on Starbucks Reserve Coffee Shops in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, August.
    8. van Aalst, M.A. & Koomen, E. & Tran, D.D. & Hoang, H.M. & Nguyen, H.Q. & de Groot, H.L.F., 2023. "The economic sustainability of rice farming and its influence on farmer decision-making in the upper Mekong delta, Vietnam," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    9. Aleksandra Jonkisz & Piotr Karniej & Dorota Krasowska, 2022. "The Servqual Method as an Assessment Tool of the Quality of Medical Services in Selected Asian Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Hanlong Gu & Yiying Liu & Fengkui Qian & Qiubing Wang & Xiuru Dong, 2021. "An Empirical Analysis of the Factors Affecting Farmer Satisfaction Under the China Link Policy," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    11. Zenelabden, Nouran & Dikgang, Johane, 2022. "Satisfaction with water services delivery in South Africa: the effects of social comparison," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    12. Jiali Liu & Hengwei Wang, 2022. "What Is Farmers’ Level of Satisfaction under China’s Policy of Collective-Owned Commercial Construction Land Marketisation?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    13. Kumar, Tanu & Post, Alison E. & Ray, Isha & Otsuka, Megan & Pardo-Bosch, Francesc, 2022. "From public service access to service quality: The distributive politics of piped water in Bangalore," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:5300-5336 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:10:p:4989-5007 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Alessandro Olper & Johan Swinnen, 2013. "Mass Media and Public Policy: Global Evidence from Agricultural Policies," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 27(3), pages 413-436.
    4. Tangermann, Stefan, 2011. "Risk Management in Agriculture and the Future of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy," National Policies, Trade and Sustainable Development 320171, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD).
    5. B Kelsey Jack, "undated". "Market Inefficiencies and the Adoption of Agricultural Technologies in Developing Countries," CID Working Papers 50, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    6. Suzan Dağaşaner & Ayşe Gözde Karaatmaca, 2025. "The Role of Online Banking Service Clues in Enhancing Individual and Corporate Customers’ Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Customer Experience as a Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-29, April.
    7. Siti Noor Aishah Mohd Sidik & Hanis Athirah Abd Sukor & Nur Fatwa Atiqah & Aiezwa Zetty Syafina Saedon & Fatin Syafiqah Mohd Apandi & Muhammad Kamal Fudhail Mohd Rahim, 2024. "Customer Satisfaction among J&T Users in Terengganu," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(9), pages 352-362, September.
    8. G. Yoganandan & Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahman & M. Vasan & Abdelrhman Meero, 2022. "Evaluating agripreneurs’ satisfaction: exploring the effect of demographics and emporographics," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Johan Swinnen & Alessandro Olper & Senne Vandevelde, 2021. "From unfair prices to unfair trading practices: Political economy, value chains and 21st century agri‐food policy," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(5), pages 771-788, September.
    10. Hasim Hasim & Muslim Salam & Andi Amran Sulaiman & Muhammad Hatta Jamil & Hari Iswoyo & Pipi Diansari & Ariady Arsal & Andi Nixia Tenriawaru & Akhsan Akhsan & Ahmad Imam Muslim, 2025. "Employing Binary Logistic Regression in Modeling the Effectiveness of Agricultural Extension in Clove Farming: Facts and Findings from Sidrap Regency, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-28, March.
    11. Bhattacharjee, Subhra, 2012. "Comment," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123330, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Anderson, Kym & Valenzuela, Ernesto & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2009. "Welfare and Poverty Effects of Global Agricultural and Trade Policies Using the Linkage Model," Agricultural Distortions Working Paper Series 52785, World Bank.
    13. Kamel Louhichi & Aymeric Ricome & Sergio Gomez y Paloma, 2022. "Impacts of agricultural taxation in Sub‐Saharan Africa: Insights from agricultural produce cess in Tanzania," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(5), pages 671-686, September.
    14. Gao, Junzhe & Opute, Abdullah Promise & Jawad, Caroline & Zhan, Meng, 2025. "The influence of artificial intelligence chatbot problem solving on customers’ continued usage intention in e-commerce platforms: an expectation-confirmation model approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    15. Kym Anderson & Ernesto Valenzuela, 2021. "What impact are subsidies and trade barriers abroad having on Australasian and Brazilian agriculture?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(2), pages 265-290, April.
    16. Hang Thi Thuy Nguyen & Thi Quynh Anh Le & Pham Xuan Hung & Nguyen Thai Phan, 2026. "Non-farm employment and agricultural mechanisation adoption: A reciprocal relationship," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 72(1), pages 37-55.
    17. Mohamed Albaity & Mahfuzur Rahman, 2021. "Customer Loyalty towards Islamic Banks: The Mediating Role of Trust and Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    18. Arpan Kumar Kar & P. S. Varsha & Shivakami Rajan, 2023. "Unravelling the Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) in Industrial Applications: A Review of Scientific and Grey Literature," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(4), pages 659-689, December.
    19. Soderlund, Magnus & Oikarinen, Eeva-Liisa & Tan, Teck Ming, 2021. "The happy virtual agent and its impact on the human customer in the service encounter," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    20. Gunjan Malhotra & Vimi Jham & Nidhi Sehgal, 2022. "Does Psychological Ownership Matter? Investigating Consumer Green Brand Relationships through the Lens of Anthropomorphism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    21. Mengxi Yang & Mengyang Wang, 2025. "How AI service quality influence brand loyalty: moderating effects of innovativeness, brand ethicality, and privacy concern," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 32(4), pages 282-297, July.
    22. repec:osf:socarx:69cdm_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Ali Noudoostbeni & Kiran Kaur & Hashem Salarzadeh Jenatabadi, 2018. "A Comparison of Structural Equation Modeling Approaches with DeLone & McLean’s Model: A Case Study of Radio-Frequency Identification User Satisfaction in Malaysian University Libraries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:18:p:8108-:d:1479612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.